Nothing this month, even views,nothing...

I have 130 images there, isn't too many but...

Question: Am I happy that I opted out of this rubbish from day one?

Answer: You bet! 

First one from photos.com. A nasty subscription . Where's my 50$

What size was it sold for Vonkara? Anything over 3300 longest side should be PPD and not subscription.

QuoteJust to reiterate, on Photos.com, only "Super", "Ultra", and EPS sized files are sold as PPDs and ELs. An image is categorized as "Super" if its longest side has a length between 3300 and 4824 pixels. An image is categorized as "Ultra" if its longest side is longer than 4824 pixels.

I am still waiting for my sizes to be fixed. Any update Steve-Oh?

It was Large size. Do not qualify It should, because it's quite easy to take a L and make it XL. And to take a L and print it everywhere you want under 24x36 inches prints.

Do you really think that JI agenda is the success of microstocks and contributors...
They just buy ms to rescue their business.

bit off topic, but I didn't see any recent threads on this........ but....

I haven't uploaded to StockXpert in some time.... just did so and saw approval within a couple hours!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the immortal words of Darth Vadar, 'Most Impressive"    KUDOS TO StockXpert!!!!!!!!!!!   =tom

Nice to see they haven't loosened their standards with all that pressure to supply free content to JI and P.C....   3 rejections for property releases... 

The concern with subs and Photos.com is no EUL right? 30 cents is it, and this is not fair considering the EULA on SS and other micro agencies, that's the gist of it, am I correct? Out of curiosity, is there a concern of a contributor's subs on SX cannibalizing his pay-per-downloads on the same agency, on SX? In other words, do buyers who have subscriptions buy an image as a pay per download if the image isn't available as a subscription?