MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => iStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: chellyar on May 02, 2010, 15:10

Title: Disambiguating old images?
Post by: chellyar on May 02, 2010, 15:10

Hurro,

Is it worth the effort?

I've (finally) got with the reset of the world and started using deepmeta, and I noticed that it's a lot quicker to DA old images using it than the web site (no surprise really)

So, my question for the day, is it worth going through and DA'ing older images?

Cheers, Chris H.

Title: Re: Disambiguating old images?
Post by: ShadySue on May 02, 2010, 16:56

Quote from: chellyar on May 02, 2010, 15:10

Hurro,

Is it worth the effort?

I've (finally) got with the reset of the world and started using deepmeta, and I noticed that it's a lot quicker to DA old images using it than the web site (no surprise really)

So, my question for the day, is it worth going through and DA'ing older images?

Cheers, Chris H.

Yes, of course. Why would you want to p*ss off buyers?

Title: Re: Disambiguating old images?
Post by: Phil on May 02, 2010, 17:35

I would think it would be good, but I wouldnt hit the 'optimise' button :)

Title: Re: Disambiguating old images?
Post by: chellyar on May 03, 2010, 05:51

Quote from: ShadySue on May 02, 2010, 16:56

Quote from: chellyar on May 02, 2010, 15:10

Is it worth the effort?

Yes, of course. Why would you want to p*ss off buyers?

I suppose the real question is whether or not it does annoy the buyers?  Or does having the auto disambiguation of an image push it to the bottom of the heap in the best match process?

Anyway, two votes yes, no votes no...  Looks like my auto-DA'd images have been voted off the island.