Author Topic: start again? (Read 26764 times)

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #50 on:** February 27, 2012, 01:35 »

Old - VERY VERY OLD - thread alert

BaldricksTrousers · « **Reply #51 on:** February 27, 2012, 01:55 »

OOOOOppppS!!!

lagereek · « **Reply #52 on:** February 27, 2012, 02:14 »

Same here! and same as Lisa, I also had a 90% acceptance rate with a port of some 2000 images, I stopped uploading 5 months back, no point. Also I agree, who you are is far more important then quality, if youre an exclusive you can upload almost any old rubbish and its accepted. Take 5 minutes and look at whats coming through as new images, just generics and tons of irrelevant material.
The quality will be held by Getty, the dustbin material by IS/TS.

qwerty · « **Reply #53 on:** February 27, 2012, 04:29 »

is that a record 3 years old ?

RacePhoto · « **Reply #54 on:** February 28, 2012, 13:22 »

Quote from: qwerty on February 27, 2012, 04:29

is that a record 3 years old ?

Not that I can see. Someone brought back one from four years ago recently, if they had only waited a week it would have been a full four years.

Best was it was started by someone who hasn't been here for at least two years. Here's the number for TWIST = Last Active: February 06, 2011, 10:32 (fair enough over a year)

Should that be the Easter Egg Hunt? Find the oldest moldy thread that was brought back to life in 2011? LOL