0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nice portfolio. You know where to get your inspiration from.
I'm a bit confused... Am I in a court?
Quote from: Air0ne on January 24, 2011, 12:06I'm a bit confused... Am I in a court?You probably should be. Or detained in a home for the criminally unoriginal.
I will be curious to see with what kind of pictures you all started... I'm just a bit disappointed to see how it works here
Quote from: Air0ne on January 24, 2011, 12:06I'm a bit confused... Am I in a court?sorry, but you invited a microscope and your work is strikingly identical to another prolific contributor's images. there's a line between inspiration and copying. sure, we all want to make money and there is a finite number of salable concepts....but you've basically just ripped off a best selling artist's work. you're not going to get much sympathy or help in a forum populated by microstock peers. maybe post your images in a traditional stock forum..they'd be happy to see a microstock contributor being cannibalized.
Luis, with all due respect, if you have to ask....that's a problem. you know if you do it, and others know if you do it. in this example it's blatant IMO.
The legality might be questionable (or unenforceable) but the ethics are not. It's bad enough to be so blatant ... but then to also request 'congratulations' is simply breathtaking.If I ran an agency and someone did what the OP has done, if the original artist brought it to my attention, then I would simply close the account of the copier. I believe the agencies do have a responsibility to protect their original artists. I think Ioannis should be informed.
Quote from: SNP on January 24, 2011, 12:54Luis, with all due respect, if you have to ask....that's a problem. you know if you do it, and others know if you do it. in this example it's blatant IMO. that´s the exact answer I would want to hear, finally!I agree 100%.. why agencies keep approving?
Quote from: luissantos84 on January 24, 2011, 13:00Quote from: SNP on January 24, 2011, 12:54Luis, with all due respect, if you have to ask....that's a problem. you know if you do it, and others know if you do it. in this example it's blatant IMO. that´s the exact answer I would want to hear, finally!I agree 100%.. why agencies keep approving?they keep approving A: because inspectors can't be expected to know every image in the databases....B: because even if the images are copied and do squeak through, the agency makes money anyways because it'll sell if it's good enough. C: there are always going to be unscrupulous people who want to fastest route to making money
why don´t a reviewer know this kind of work? they are SO FAMOUS!