MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => Off Topic => Topic started by: Whiz on March 02, 2009, 18:54

Title: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: Whiz on March 02, 2009, 18:54
I finished my website redesign the other day, and I just thought I would ask you opinions about it. Word of warning: IE6 and under web browsers will not display the site correctly. This is due to me creating the site mostly in CSS. Thanks for your thoughts.

http://jrtmedia.com/ (http://jrtmedia.com/)
Title: Re: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: snaprender on March 02, 2009, 20:40
I like the site, especially the warm colors you used.  Looks very inviting!
Title: Re: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: fljac on March 03, 2009, 05:34
WoW!
It works very very well..  The pages are well composed and the level of detals / text is fine - not too little, not too much..  Nice experience to visit the page...

Having said that, I would like to suggest that you make it a little more eyecatching by choosing another mixture of colors.  But that's just a minor detail and i'm sure that there are a lot of different opinnions about that.

 8)

Best regards
Flemming
Title: Re: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: Whiz on April 02, 2009, 13:56
I was unsatisfied with the home page, so I updated that again. I think I'm done now.

http://jrtmedia.com/ (http://jrtmedia.com/)
Title: Re: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: rimglow on April 02, 2009, 14:29
Congrats on not using Flash!  Loads fast, and very user friendly.
Title: Re: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: madelaide on April 02, 2009, 16:29
Whiz,

Since you are using FP to show your portfolio, and since they give us a high commission, don't you think you should give them more relevance?  You show IS in the first page and you don't say it's FP in the portfolio page (although it's listed together with the other sites).

Regards,
Adelaide
Title: Re: Thoughts on My Website Redesign?
Post by: Whiz on April 02, 2009, 18:31
Whiz,

Since you are using FP to show your portfolio, and since they give us a high commission, don't you think you should give them more relevance?  You show IS in the first page and you don't say it's FP in the portfolio page (although it's listed together with the other sites).

Regards,
Adelaide


The thing is, I've only had three sales with Featurepics in my year or two that I've been with them (480 or so files). I think that most people prefer to buy their images on the more common sites, so Featurepics is only useful for displaying them in my opinion. Then, after looking at the images, the buyers might click on one of my gallery links to purchase some of my images. That's my guess anyway.