|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Microstockphoto
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 ... 49
1026
« on: November 13, 2015, 07:07 »
Yes my second comment
1027
« on: November 13, 2015, 05:12 »
The keyword klansman is in there which is obviously the KKK
1028
« on: November 13, 2015, 05:11 »
Thats probably their unambigues keywording system, the 'controlled vocabulaire', having an epic brainfart
1029
« on: November 12, 2015, 10:52 »
Most agencies offer a comp image. Its very low quality. Don't worry about it
1030
« on: November 11, 2015, 16:17 »
Another one bites the dust
1031
« on: November 11, 2015, 12:47 »
Dumc, i dont recall saying anything about rejecting best sellers
1032
« on: November 11, 2015, 10:53 »
I am all in for less competition
1033
« on: November 11, 2015, 10:27 »
Images for Prime are being reviewed
1034
« on: November 11, 2015, 09:38 »
It is a very manual process, upload watermarked preview, upload unwatermarked full res, submit full res (about 4-10 clicks), no batch submission possible
1035
« on: November 11, 2015, 03:20 »
jodijacobson, that sounds like they are desperate to keep exclusives on board and they used their oldest trick sticks and carrots, history teaches us lessons, learn from them
1036
« on: November 11, 2015, 03:17 »
Why the hostility towards a company offering truly high royalties and not even a micro stock agency, they make me more in one sale than some smaller micros in a year
1037
« on: November 10, 2015, 18:55 »
Haha
1038
« on: November 10, 2015, 16:09 »
...
1039
« on: November 10, 2015, 14:55 »
Getty probably has 200,000,000 photos so they really dont need more photographers or happy photographers, its the least of their concerns, they need sales, theyre losing ground
1040
« on: November 08, 2015, 17:54 »
Rinderart its 2015
1041
« on: November 06, 2015, 18:08 »
Why do you think this is a troll? Im a beginner and have no intention to fool anyone, just trying to improve.
I think that you're trolling here, because I can't imagine that a reasonable man, who have no understanding about photography at all, don't understand what a rubbish he is showing. So You upload here absolutely trash, ask for a opinion, read comments and laughing at people who waste their time and are trying to help you.
If you really need an opinion, then you got it: your snapshots are absolutely trash. There is nothing to discuss about. You need elementary knowledge.
So don't waste others time and do some homework himself. Browse forums, read books and magazines, check 10 agencies best sellers, check 100 best photographers portfolios, practice with your camera- do 10000 shots and examine them. Then after two months of hard work come here and show your photos. Such is my advice.
No offense.
Ive never quoted anyone here but this has me wondering, very rude, but you want to the agencies to treat you with respect. is it not reap what you sow? we complain the agencies treat us like garbage but I would expect us to be better than that, yet we paint our own with the same brush
1042
« on: November 06, 2015, 15:13 »
That message just means they were testing lower royalties and it hit the live site by accident. my guess is we can expect lower royalties soon. 30 cents instead of 38 then. I mean, a bug, really.
1043
« on: November 06, 2015, 04:25 »
the conclusion is diluted earnings, yes more paid per download on avarage, but spread over more images and contributors thus less earnings per individual
if it wasnt for the big sales my earnings would be dire
1044
« on: November 05, 2015, 09:58 »
cutting our earnings have worked then, although they paid us more per download
1045
« on: November 04, 2015, 06:07 »
Depends how you count, if you count images accepted against unique images submitted, not how many times an image has been submitted
if you submit 1 image and it gets rejected twice and accepted once, you have 1 image online, 100%
there are many ways to calculate and everyone has their own system plus ss doesnt give you an acceptance rate, so i just guessed
1046
« on: November 04, 2015, 05:24 »
Submitting 3 times to get the photos accepted gives you a high acceptance rate but also indicates a problem with the review process
1047
« on: November 03, 2015, 11:25 »
Not denying any of that
1048
« on: November 03, 2015, 10:48 »
you got the point, right?
1050
« on: November 03, 2015, 08:18 »
'Try to start with shooting everything when the sun is setting'
Because?
i dont see a valid reason to exclude normal daylight images when done right
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 ... 49
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
