1126
Mostphotos.com / Re: Mostphotos goes Rip-Off
« on: March 15, 2015, 05:55 »
I forgot that they also let you opt out of subs.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1126
Mostphotos.com / Re: Mostphotos goes Rip-Off« on: March 15, 2015, 05:55 »
I forgot that they also let you opt out of subs.
1127
General Stock Discussion / Re: StockUnlimited Brings The Netflix Model To Stock Imagery« on: March 14, 2015, 05:23 »
Am I the only one that has left a comment at the bottom of the page?
http://techcrunch.com/2015/03/12/stockunlimited-brings-the-netflix-model-to-stock-content-starting-with-vector-graphics/ 1128
Dreamstime.com / Re: Owner of Dreamstime is millionaire« on: March 13, 2015, 08:15 »
They should turn fox news in to a full on comedy. So many Brits had a good laugh when they said Birmingham was a no-go area for non-Muslims. The "expert" was unable to say where he had read that and obviously hadn't bothered doing any fact checking or speaking to anyone that had ever been to Birmingham. It should be called Fox (ridiculous made up stuff that nobody with an IQ higher than their shoe size should take seriously) news
1129
General Stock Discussion / Re: StockUnlimited Brings The Netflix Model To Stock Imagery« on: March 13, 2015, 07:51 »
Will this be any better than the free sites that are full of LCV images that the vast majority of designers wont bother with? Maybe this will get some of the people that only use free images but I doubt it will change the miscrostock world much.
1130
Mostphotos.com / Re: Mostphotos goes Rip-Off« on: March 12, 2015, 07:25 »@sharpshot: If I am correct, Axel already has pulled his port from Shutterstock and some other agencies.Might as well forget microstock and just use the higher priced sites then? I just find the op strange because mostphotos has been doing this for such a long time. Anyone that can't accept getting paid that little should of left by now. I'm OK with their average, that's what keeps me there. 1131
Mostphotos.com / Re: Mostphotos goes Rip-Off« on: March 12, 2015, 04:46 »
I sold one for 150 euro in January, get uploading again
![]() 1132
GLStock / Re: GL down?« on: March 11, 2015, 04:11 »
Uploading wasn't a chore, it was 10 seconds work a week. There was no reason to stop uploading until they stopped it.
1133
GLStock / Re: GL down?« on: March 10, 2015, 19:03 »
Google have killed off other sites that have nothing to do with microstock before. Would be good to have an independent non-profit search engine that was used by everyone but I suppose that's never going to happen.
I think GL are still doing relatively well, there's lots of sites that have been around for years selling much less. Just to be 13th in the earnings poll here is quite an achievement when you look at the huge list of sites. 1134
GLStock / Re: GL down?« on: March 10, 2015, 07:37 »
They haven't announced that uploads have started again, so i suspect Beppe Grillo just hasn't uploaded for a while?
I wish they would allow even 10 uploads a week, just to give the buyers something new to look at. They sell something occasionally for me. 1136
General Stock Discussion / Re: Is Alamy now trying to screw contributors?« on: March 05, 2015, 04:21 »
This is from their forum.
"We're preparing a full response to the EPUK letter that will be ready very soon. If the response is not posted to the EPUK website in full, we will post it somewhere where everyone can read it. The response covers all of the concerns raised. Alamy." http://discussion.alamy.com/index.php?/topic/3763-contributor-contracts-changes/?p=63197 1137
Still waiting from early November to get my first batch in. Unsure if they are still stuck in the queue or I should re-upload. I have no access to backend so there is no way for me to check. Is anyone else in this position still?I would wait, they do seem to get around to reviewing eventually. 1138
Envato / Re: Envato want to be a reseller and makes the contributor to the seller!?« on: March 04, 2015, 04:18 »
I fail to see how Envato are simply facilitating transactions between contributors and buyers when they have a payout threshold and will be holding on to some peoples money forever. If they really wanted to not be an agency, they need to have a system where the contributor is paid automatically as soon as a buyer purchases a license.
Now they are going to have a lot of contributors leaving because they don't want to deal with the potential tax problems and they will be keeping their money under the $50 payout threshold, how can a reseller justify keeping that money? 1139
General - Stock Video / Re: Video on istock - question« on: March 03, 2015, 04:49 »
I would be very concerned about the Getty/istock financial problems. How are they going to get the money they need to keep going? Seems likely to me that they will have to cut exclusive commissions, as what other options do they have? So I would be more inclined to go with Pond5 and all the other non-exclusive sites.
1140
Shutterstock.com / Re: fifty million stock images on Shutterstock 50 Million!« on: March 02, 2015, 11:31 »
How long will alamy be able to claim they are the worlds largest stock photo collection?
1141
Off Topic / Re: Blue and black or gold and white?« on: March 01, 2015, 13:29 »
Hobostocker doesn't seem to of noticed that lots of people see the different colours on the same screen, so it doesn't have anything to do with modern TFT displays.
1142
Envato / Re: Envato want to be a reseller and makes the contributor to the seller!?« on: March 01, 2015, 10:29 »Why are you leaving so fast? The way I see it it's legally impossible for them to claim that the contributors are the sellers. So things will probably change?Fast? This should of been sorted out 2 months ago. It's an obvious problem for contributors that we don't need and none of the other sites I use has done this. I don't want to continue with a low earning site that doesn't see that this is a big problem or, more likely, doesn't care. 1143
Envato / Re: Envato want to be a reseller and makes the contributor to the seller!?« on: February 28, 2015, 10:09 »
My portfolio has gone. Annoying that another small bit of income has gone but I couldn't see any other option.
1144
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty profits decline on poor istock performance« on: February 28, 2015, 04:42 »
Will the fact that it looks like they could go bankrupt at some point make buyers look elsewhere now? Will they feel comfortable paying subscription fees upfront or will they go back to paying for individual images?
Are the Carlyle Group just going to write off Getty? Looks like some of their previous acquisitions have ended up filing for bankruptcy, is Getty too big to fail or just a small part of their portfolio that can be written off? I'm guessing the latter. This one is interesting, Oriental Trading Company was owned by the Carlyle Group and filed for bankruptcy and was then purchased by Berkshire Hathaway. Time for some wild speculation, would be interesting if Warren Buffett got Getty, he is friends with Bill Gates who owns Corbis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriental_Trading_Company 1145
Off Topic / Re: Blue and black or gold and white?« on: February 28, 2015, 04:13 »....and where the black is coming from ?? with PS they're all shades of Gold/Brown, check by yourself...The original question was what colour is the dress, so while I see some gold/brown colours in the black, that looks like a reflection from the shiny surface. So the actual material looks black. Maybe that is part of the problem, some people are looking at the colour of the light refelecting from the surface, rather than guessing what colour the dress is? I don't see any white, the blue colour is quite strong. 1146
Off Topic / Re: NO ONE is making money from YouTube, even Google report« on: February 27, 2015, 18:55 »
Do any of these big businesses make a taxable profit
![]() 1147
Off Topic / Re: Blue and black or gold and white?« on: February 27, 2015, 18:54 »
The blue is so strong to me, there's no way I can see that as white. They mentioned on the TV that it might be down to the difference in peoples light sensitive cells in the back of the eye.
1148
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty profits decline on poor istock performance« on: February 27, 2015, 13:30 »Does istock still exist? It seems completely absorbed by Getty to me, I don't think they could spin it off and who would they sell it to? Selling to one of their rivals wouldn't be a good business move. 1149
Off Topic / Blue and black or gold and white?« on: February 27, 2015, 10:27 »
I see blue and black
http://mashable.com/2015/02/26/what-color-dress-blue-black-white-gold/ 1150
General Stock Discussion / Re: If you think we're having it bad look at musicians ...« on: February 27, 2015, 09:28 »
Just shows how out of touch with modern music you are if you haven't heard of Calvin Harris. And it isn't always conventional groups that make music, nothing new there, remember Frank Farian? He was behind Boney M and Milli Vanilli.
|
|