|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - hatman12
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51
1151
« on: March 30, 2007, 03:17 »
Yep, they are fussy, perfectionists and efficient Tom; but my God they can sell photos........
The reason why? The designers trust them......
1152
« on: March 26, 2007, 18:49 »
Probably important to jump on board Corbis as soon as they launch.
Will be interesting to see what pricing model they use - will they try to attract millions of images by higher pricing and commissions like DT, or will they go lower with exclusive bonuses like IS.
1153
« on: March 25, 2007, 21:14 »
Yes, the eye is drawn straight to the reflection in the background.
1154
« on: March 23, 2007, 16:56 »
100 would be okay.......
1155
« on: March 21, 2007, 14:07 »
Nelson, I agree with berryspun; nowadays I find myself using a tripod for almost every photo, even on a sunny day at the beach. Results are always just that little bit sharper, even at 1:250th F11 on a sunny beach.
Your D70s is a noisy camera, and even noisier if you shoot RAW. Don't even bother. Turn down all the camera processing algorithms to 'zero', ie sharpening, saturation etc and go out and shoot a few jpegs and RAWs and compare the results.
With my D200 I shoot only jpegs. I've been through the RAW stage. So long as I can get exposure spot on, my jpeg results are as good if not better than RAW. I never use noise reduction, ever.
Also, watch out for that zoom lens. Try using a standard 50mm and compare it with that zoom. I use a 60mm micro for 70% of my shots, whether macro, medium or even portraits. My next lens will be the 35mm F2 or even one of the old 35mm F1.4 if I can find a good one.
If you keep everything simple the results improve. Good lens, tripod, zero settings, correct exposure.
1156
« on: March 21, 2007, 03:14 »
Now 40,000 images in the waiting list at DT. Looks like they are being swamped. Presumably its the higher prices and higher commissions per sale.
1157
« on: March 20, 2007, 06:42 »
Nice portfolio sharply. Something makes me think you might live near an airport....
1158
« on: March 20, 2007, 06:41 »
Well at long last the duck has started quacking again.....
1159
« on: March 20, 2007, 06:39 »
Freezing, you should never divulge an interesting business idea unless you have confidence that the other parties will not take that idea for themselves. On the other hand it is sometimes difficult making business decisions without the advice of others. It all comes down to whom you trust, or not.
There might be one or two people on this forum whom you trust enough to share that idea.
Leaf might be a good start.
1160
« on: March 19, 2007, 03:53 »
SLOWER than DT? It must be a dead duck then......
1161
« on: March 19, 2007, 03:04 »
Well done BTW.
1162
« on: March 19, 2007, 03:03 »
Couple of batches of ten to start, then perhaps a batch of seven or eight every coupla days.
1163
« on: March 18, 2007, 23:16 »
Currently I only upload to IS, SS and DT.
I hate the fact that FT misleads by publishing that 2.5 mill headline figure (lying *insult removed*), but looking through their top sales list, it does seem that they are making sales.
Anyone here noticed any trends at FT recently (increased or decreased sales)?
1164
« on: March 18, 2007, 20:08 »
Waiting for approval list is still up at 35,000. My own uploads have continued as before, but the waiting time for approval seems to have lengthened considerably. I've got 28 in the list, the largest number ever, even though I am uploading at the same rate.
It's all very well attracting such huge numbers of images. But can they get the customers?
A quick look at the 'most popular' list shows downloads of the biggest sellers at very small levels.
1165
« on: March 18, 2007, 13:49 »
I have only been there a week, but of my initial 84 approved images, 58 have been downloaded. That's 69%.
1166
« on: March 18, 2007, 13:41 »
That sounds like the right approach to me Tom. I am not convinced that uploading to munerous agencies is efficient use of time and energy; oarticularly the small ones who make only occasional sales. Better to invest that time in creating images.
I have always believed that IS would produce the goods over and above all the others, and my initial experience is that those thoughts were correct. It is slow and tedious (and frustrating) getting established there, but it is the only agency where I have had designers write to me about my images. Istock seems to have a massive customer base, and that is what is needed to produce sales.
I started with DT and IS at the same time (first week of February). Although I have many more images up at DT, IS has produced double the income and is already producing downloads at an average of 2.2 per day (which I am pleased with after only six weeks).
My third agency is SS following your recommendation. 156 downloads in my first eight days. But I suspect that this will tail off as per everyone else's experience on this board, unless I can upload like a furious maniac (but I do not have the library to be able to do that).
1167
« on: March 16, 2007, 21:01 »
OMG. A download at DT. Wonders never cease....
1168
« on: March 16, 2007, 21:00 »
Very impressive. Many congrats.
1169
« on: March 16, 2007, 21:00 »
Yes Tom - I took your advice re SS. Many thanks.
1170
« on: March 16, 2007, 17:20 »
Well for me it's died. Dead. No views, no sales. Nuffink.
1171
« on: March 16, 2007, 16:01 »
Your experience seems to be the same as everyone else on this board Penny.
I suppose SS have a bunch of clients who want to download everything, so once uploads stop so do the downloads.
Only answer to that is to upload furiously on a constant basis I suppose. But I think that might take some of the pleasure out of what we do.
1172
« on: March 16, 2007, 14:59 »
Glad its improving for you Lee. I've had a quick look at my keywords etc and everything seems fine. I have been uploading three or four images every day as usual but DT has comnpletely died for me. Was making what I thought was good progress until about a week ago.
Perhaps its just a phase.
1173
« on: March 16, 2007, 03:52 »
Congrats to you FreezingP.
No doubt the shadows are deliberate. Symmetrical.
1174
« on: March 16, 2007, 03:51 »
I know I have only been uploading to SS for a week or so. But so far the speed of the thing is surprising me. I heard so many stories about huge rejection rates etc etc. Yet they are accepting almost all of my images and approving within hours. This surprises me - its not what I expected. Huge numbers of downloads too. How can they accept so many images so quickly?
It took me six weeks to get 60 images up at IS. At SS I've got 80 in six or seven days.
Does SS publish a waiting list etc like some of the other agencies do?
1175
« on: March 16, 2007, 02:36 »
Well DT is still dead (for me). Saw their statistics page; a whopping 37,000 images waiting to be approved. No wonder things are taking so long. And no wonder they've reduced the number of images people can submit. Have the price increases caused this rush?
At the same time, the waiting list at IS has declined from 30,000 to 20,000 and I am finding my images being accepted more quickly than ever before.
Interesting. Coincidence?
At SS my images are being accepted so quickly it's frightening - acceptance usually within hours. And almost every image is being accepted; out of 80 submissions I have had only 2 declines. That doesn't tie in with all the stories of difficulty, noise, high rejections etc.
So something is going on. Or perhaps I am just suspicious in my old age.....
I expect to see price and commission increases at SS and eventually at IS. Competition seems rife....
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
