MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - melastmohican
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 67
1301
« on: October 08, 2008, 13:18 »
No uploads for 2 weeks causes big drop in sales but it seems to be even more devastating on 123RF and StockXpert where my sales when 10x lower than on SS.
1302
« on: October 06, 2008, 16:49 »
I actually got couple sales there before I sent them a DVD. Now I have over 1700 pictures there and one sale so I think they do not have enough traffic to generate sales. I think they still got better chance to survive than YAY and other newcomers because of huge financial support from Corbis. Soon all smaller sites should fold down due to economic crisis and these guys still should live on their parent money.
1303
« on: October 06, 2008, 14:17 »
It's kind hard to expect any sales if most of then pictures got less than 10 views :-)
1304
« on: October 06, 2008, 14:14 »
I did not login to my account for a while and it was surprise to me today. No files. I hope they do backup.
1305
« on: October 06, 2008, 14:09 »
It has been second weekend and I did not upload a single picture in October. Sales are slow on SS, 123RF and StockXpert which are usually my top 3.
1306
« on: October 03, 2008, 17:55 »
I got more than 1500 images online there and first sale of $10 priced image. Not much traffic, best photo got only 30 views.
1307
« on: October 03, 2008, 14:20 »
I am so small on IS but you can count me in melastmohican
1308
« on: October 02, 2008, 16:46 »
I usually do not keyword for any specific agency so I prefer specific keywords over generic ones. I would rather keep only "pumpkin" and get rid of generic ones. More over some of this generic ones like "horizontal" can be auto generated (width > height). Soon every site might have face recognition software which may tell if there are people present :-)
1309
« on: October 02, 2008, 15:26 »
I wish that Lightroom contains all my photo post processing stuff and I would leave PS to designers :-)
1310
« on: October 02, 2008, 15:01 »
Come on, you can get not-so-latest version of PhotoShop Elements for couple dollars and it's still better than Gimp. Unless you are designer you should live ok with it. Gimp is not ready for main stream consumers. Authors think that most important is to be different than PS, de facto industry standard.
1311
« on: October 02, 2008, 14:44 »
It added word "image" to results. It can apply to almost anything and how it would help a search engine to find relevant file?
Can you tell how many results would this set of keywords generate: "Image, Horizontal, Color Image, Nobody, Summer, Outdoors, Landscape, Non-Urban Scene"? Adding them will make no difference I think.
1312
« on: October 02, 2008, 13:04 »
Some sites impose upload limits so I would rather send them DVD and let them deal with my whole portfolio at once than waiting for years to upload it.
1313
« on: October 02, 2008, 12:58 »
Mostly useless for my type of photos (nature, landscape) . A lot of very technical categories (composition, type of focus, light type) which can be used almost for any type of photo so it's just spamming. Probably useful for illustrators and designers who create sets of objects with different layout or colors. Yuri Arcurs got much better stuff here: http://arcurs.com/keywording/
1315
« on: October 01, 2008, 18:07 »
I did. It never helped me in any way.
1316
« on: October 01, 2008, 18:06 »
I was always puzzled about these calculations.
1. Monthly income / total no. of images - does not make any sense cause it will keep going down when you add more photos 2. Total income / total no. of images - makes more sense cause you can see whole pictures but you might no see monthly results 3. Monthly income / no. of images upload a month - it's kind of unclear cause different images might be downloaded and uploaded 4. Monthly income / no. of downloads - this would indicate structure of downloads (sub to credit ratio)
1317
« on: October 01, 2008, 16:16 »
I know Snapvillage does. Who else?
1318
« on: October 01, 2008, 12:35 »
SS 61.49% 123RF 13.67% (BME) StockXpert 10.48% DT 8.51% (BME) IS 2.51% (BME) BS 1.89% FT 1.44% SV 0.57%
Overall 18% less than in August due to poor SS performance. Finally reached payout at StockXpert and 123RF. 123RF and DT performed quite well in comparison to previous months so maybe it would start a trend.
1319
« on: September 30, 2008, 14:00 »
At first I made mistake when exporting from LR2 (it put watermark in files by default). I had to re-send pictures but now I got 1/3 third reviewed after 1 week. Surprisingly they are quite efficient so it going to be much less problems than trying to upload. I do not know how long it would take to index cause I got very few views on pictures which are published.
1320
« on: September 30, 2008, 13:55 »
I got plenty of them but I sent out DVDs with 3000 pictures so I will have goods stats showing what kind of photos they are interested in when they finish processing.
1321
« on: September 25, 2008, 16:58 »
Discussion about quality is like discussion about size. In theory for most buyers minimum acceptable size should be enough so why bother uploading more. Same with quality if it passes site verification it means it's good enough. According to Peter 2x better quality give you 10x better sales :-)
1322
« on: September 25, 2008, 15:02 »
Yes I observed the same thing this month, I cannot beat my BME back in June 
For me it was going up every month till August then stopped at the beginning of September.
1323
« on: September 25, 2008, 15:00 »
I am not sure what's more important quality (if it passes quality control from SS it must be good enough) or originality (I saw sometimes that pictures even worse but sell better if they are unique).
1324
« on: September 25, 2008, 14:24 »
I guess I got 10 days on average. My question is if my queue is also blocked for 10 days cause it seems like I cannot add anything if my slots are not available. This way 15 per week is not possible.
1325
« on: September 25, 2008, 14:18 »
It seems that September might be much slower than previous months despite that I actually uploaded more pictures than in August. So what is more important size or frequency of uploads?
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 67
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|