pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - melastmohican

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 67
1301
Shutterstock.com / Re: How much this beast need to be fed?
« on: October 08, 2008, 13:18 »
No uploads for 2 weeks causes big drop in sales but it seems to be even more devastating on 123RF and StockXpert where my sales when 10x lower than on SS.

1302
SnapVillage.com / Re: How many customers does this site have?
« on: October 06, 2008, 16:49 »
I actually got couple sales there before I sent them a DVD. Now I have over 1700 pictures there and one sale so I think they do not have enough traffic to generate sales. I think they still got better chance to survive than YAY and other newcomers because of huge financial support from Corbis. Soon all smaller sites should fold down due to economic crisis and these guys still should live on their parent money.

1303
SnapVillage.com / How many customers does this site have?
« on: October 06, 2008, 14:17 »
It's kind hard to expect any sales if most of then pictures got less than 10 views :-)

1304
Cutcaster / All files disapeared
« on: October 06, 2008, 14:14 »
I did not login to my account for a while and it was surprise to me today. No files. I hope they do backup.

1305
General Stock Discussion / Cable guy knocked out my internet
« on: October 06, 2008, 14:09 »
It has been second weekend and I did not upload a single picture in October. Sales are slow on SS, 123RF and StockXpert which are usually my top 3.

1306
SnapVillage.com / Re: Unbelievable - first sale on SV
« on: October 03, 2008, 17:55 »
I got more than 1500 images online there and first sale of $10 priced image. Not much traffic, best photo got only 30 views.

1307
iStockPhoto.com / Re: MSG Compare
« on: October 03, 2008, 14:20 »
I am so small on IS but you can count me in melastmohican

1308
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Keyword wizzard
« on: October 02, 2008, 16:46 »
I usually do not keyword for any specific agency so I prefer specific keywords over generic ones. I would rather keep only "pumpkin" and get rid of generic ones. More over some of this generic ones like "horizontal" can be auto generated (width > height). Soon every site might have face recognition software which may tell if there are people present :-)

1309
Video Equipment / Sofware / Technique / Re: GIMP New Version 2.6
« on: October 02, 2008, 15:26 »
I wish that Lightroom contains all my photo post processing stuff and I would leave PS to designers :-)

1310
Video Equipment / Sofware / Technique / Re: GIMP New Version 2.6
« on: October 02, 2008, 15:01 »
Come on, you can get not-so-latest version of PhotoShop Elements for couple dollars and it's still better than Gimp. Unless you are designer you should live ok with it.  Gimp is not ready for main stream consumers. Authors think that most important is to be different than PS, de facto industry standard.

1311
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Keyword wizzard
« on: October 02, 2008, 14:44 »
It added word "image" to results. It can apply to almost anything and how it would help a search engine to find relevant file?

Can you tell how many results would this set of keywords generate: "Image, Horizontal, Color Image, Nobody, Summer, Outdoors, Landscape, Non-Urban Scene"? Adding them will make no difference I think.

1312
Some sites impose upload limits so I would rather send them DVD and let them deal with my whole portfolio at once than waiting for years to upload it.

1313
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Keyword wizzard
« on: October 02, 2008, 12:58 »
Mostly useless for my type of photos (nature, landscape) . A lot of very technical categories (composition, type of focus, light type) which can be used almost for any type of photo so it's just spamming. Probably useful for illustrators and designers who create sets of objects with different layout or colors.

Yuri Arcurs got much better stuff here: http://arcurs.com/keywording/

1314
Photo Critique / Re: Are these good stock photo's?
« on: October 01, 2008, 18:14 »
I guess nobody knows for sure. Try to check what agencies want and what sells there. Here is a blog entry which tries to summarize this:
http://www.microstockdiaries.com/what-not-to-submit.html

1315
123RF / Re: Do you donate your photos?
« on: October 01, 2008, 18:07 »
I did. It never helped me in any way.

1316
General Stock Discussion / Re: RPI calulation
« on: October 01, 2008, 18:06 »
I was always puzzled about these calculations.

1. Monthly income  / total no. of images - does not make any sense cause it will keep going down when you add more photos
2. Total income / total no. of images  - makes more sense cause you can see whole pictures but you might no see monthly results
3. Monthly income / no. of images upload a month - it's kind of unclear cause different images might be downloaded and uploaded
4. Monthly income / no. of downloads - this would indicate structure of downloads (sub to credit ratio)

1317
I know Snapvillage does. Who else?

1318
SS   61.49%
123RF   13.67%    (BME)
StockXpert   10.48%
DT   8.51%   (BME)
IS   2.51%   (BME)
BS   1.89%
FT   1.44%
SV   0.57%

Overall 18% less than in August due to poor SS performance. Finally reached payout at StockXpert and 123RF. 123RF and DT performed quite well in comparison to previous months so maybe it would start a trend.

1319
SnapVillage.com / Re: Sending DVD
« on: September 30, 2008, 14:00 »
At first I made mistake when exporting from LR2 (it put watermark in files by default). I had to re-send pictures but now I got 1/3 third reviewed after 1 week. Surprisingly they are quite efficient so it going to be much less problems than trying to upload. I do not know how long it would take to index cause I got very few views on pictures which are published.

1320
SnapVillage.com / Re: Rejection at SnapVillage
« on: September 30, 2008, 13:55 »
I got plenty of them but I sent out DVDs with 3000 pictures so I will have goods stats showing what kind of photos they are interested in when they finish processing.

1321
Shutterstock.com / Re: How much this beast need to be fed?
« on: September 25, 2008, 16:58 »
Discussion about quality is like discussion about size. In theory for most buyers minimum acceptable size should be enough so why bother uploading more. Same with quality if it passes site verification it means it's good enough. According to Peter 2x better quality give you 10x better sales :-)

1322
Shutterstock.com / Re: How much this beast need to be fed?
« on: September 25, 2008, 15:02 »
Yes I observed the same thing this month, I cannot beat my BME back in June :(

For me it was going up every month till August then stopped at the beginning  of September.

1323
Shutterstock.com / Re: How much this beast need to be fed?
« on: September 25, 2008, 15:00 »
I am not sure what's more important quality (if it passes quality control from SS it must be good enough) or originality (I saw sometimes that pictures even worse but sell better if they are unique).

1324
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Anyone else with 11 days pending images?
« on: September 25, 2008, 14:24 »
I guess I got 10 days on average.  My question is if my queue is also blocked for 10 days cause it seems like I cannot add anything if my slots are not available. This way 15 per week is not possible.

1325
Shutterstock.com / How much this beast need to be fed?
« on: September 25, 2008, 14:18 »
It seems that September might be much slower than previous months despite that I actually uploaded more pictures than in August. So what is more important size or frequency of uploads?

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 67

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors