MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dirkr

Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56
1352
General Stock Discussion / Re: The Next Step
« on: November 06, 2008, 07:58 »

Actually I said XL which would pay out 2.50 at Dreamstime or max 4.20 at istock. But I see what you mean, not much difference really.

right, you said that. My files (Canon 30d, 8,2 MP) do not qualify for XL at Istock, so for me that is (currently) not relevant - should have mentioned that.
But otherwise those files qualify for XL on StockXpert, where the XL is 10 credits and my share 50 %... (so a buyer is paying the same for an L at Istock or an XL at StockXpert, but my share at StockXpert is about double that at Istock).

So right now (at least for me personally) I don't see a big loss in buyers moving between those sites. SS (subscriptions in general) are a different topic, but I would assume that does not really apply since somebody who has a subscription plan at any of these sites will anyway first look to use that one up before looking to buy as PPD on any other site.

1353
General Stock Discussion / Re: The Next Step
« on: November 06, 2008, 03:22 »
If you have the same image at six sites that cost less than istock, what do you think the chances are of selling that image for a higher price point/higher profit? I am an istock exclusive contributor, but I also am a customer that purchases several hundred images a year. If I need to purchase an image I will do my initial search at istock, but if I find that the image I want is by a non-exclusive, I will do a quick google search to see where else they have accounts, and if I find the same image somewhere else for cheaper, I will download there. Several of you have lost out on sales of XL files at istock because I found your same images somewhere else and could purchase them for a fraction of the cost.

That's Istock's loss, not mine.
If I get 20% of an "L" on Istock or 50% of an "L" on DT does not make much of a difference...
Therefore higher price point does not automatically mean higher profit.
Now if Istock would start paying higher percentages....

1354
similar messages from the German FT team on the German board.
I'm still waiting for some explanations, but at least FT responded.

1355
I opened a similar thread on the German FT forum, let's see how long that lives.
About two weaks ago I sent a message to FT support asking about pixmac. They closed the ticket with one sentence saying "we will answer soon".
It is just like Fotolia has always been, not responsive at all.

1356
Shutterstock.com / Re: I'm in !!!
« on: October 30, 2008, 10:18 »
Thanks again. Maybe I will give it a try for some of my rejects, when I can correct what they saw.

1357
Shutterstock.com / Re: I'm in !!!
« on: October 30, 2008, 08:36 »
Thanks, sounds reasonable.
It is just a bit tempting to upload bigger amounts to see fast returns, but I'm holding myself back for the time.
Rejections until now have been ok, 46 approved, 18 rejected.
Does it make sense to re-submit rejected pictures (e.g. downsize to remove noise/focus problems)?

1358
Shutterstock.com / Re: I'm in !!!
« on: October 30, 2008, 08:26 »
Congrats!
Sales are good for me from the beginning as well.
I'm just not quite sure about the best strategy to upload. As everyone says you need to continually feed this beast, I started with small batches (five to ten) about every other day. That will allow me to have new stuff to upload for a long time (got several hundred waiting on my hard-drive), but it will of course take a longer time to build a big portfolio. Just wondering, would it be better to upload a bigger pile in the beginning to have a reasonably sized portfolio to start with or rather keep on going in small steps?
Any opinions / experiences on this?

1359
strange, why should they ask you to keyword in German? Didn't happen to me, I submit my English versions (though I have German versions as well...).

1360
Adobe Stock / Re: GOLD member
« on: October 28, 2008, 14:39 »
Assuming that you are still "white" at FT (less than 100 sales) then, yes, that is what you'll get.
At that status your commission is 33% and the maximum price allowed for ELs is 20 credits.
When your status moves up you will be allowed to set higher prices, with the next step to bronze (after 100 sales) you can set prices up to 50 credits and your commission rises to 35%.

But why are you surprised? Did the site state something else when you entered into the contract with them to license your material?

1361
StockXpert.com / Re: Can Anyone Login to StockXpert Yet?
« on: October 28, 2008, 04:15 »
Login works for me, upload via FTP worked yesterday, all files approved today...

1362
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac reaches 1,000,000 images?!
« on: October 23, 2008, 09:19 »
technically they don't buy and re-sell (as in buy once, re-sell often). My assumption how it works: It is more like a white-labelling solution. They show pictures from FT on their website (with no direct hint that this is FT) and when someone buys, they will forward that requrest to FT, where the sale is recorded as a sale from Pixmac. Their profit is the difference of their sale price and the price they pay at FT (if any) plus they will probably get those sales booked as referred sales from FT.

But I agree, it is somehow scary and I do not understand all the details yet...

1363
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac reaches 1,000,000 images?!
« on: October 23, 2008, 07:28 »
At least those guys are responsive and fast with updating their website.
If I click on one of my pictures the author info at the left now shows my FT acronym plus "@ftl" and if I click on "all pictures by this author" it really lists my pictures... At least these problems are getting sorted out.

1364
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac reaches 1,000,000 images?!
« on: October 23, 2008, 07:08 »
Very simple. Because Fotolia is - as experienced in the past - not consistent in their business practice and their information about that.
If you look at the API section of the Fotolia website, you will find the mention of a Reseller-API, with a nice little picture as example how that works. And that picture shows the words "sell Royalty Free Images without any mention of Fotolia" - I quoted that above in this thread. That indicates, that Fotolia indeed wants to allow exactly the usage Pixmac is now doing. Strange thing now is, if you read the ToS for the API on the Fotolia website, this Reseller-API is not mentioned in there. And all other types of API do require the mentioning of Fotolia and the re-direction on the Fotolia webpage for sale of images - as you pointed out.
Conclusion? I am sure Fotolia has an agreement in place with Pixmac. And Fotolia obviously does not want to discuss this topic. And they don't want to publicly disclose their list of partners. For whatever reason...

One more thing: I read through the contract I have to accept when uploading an image. I am not a legal expert, but it looks as though this usage (Fotolia is giving a sub-license to Pixmac and allows them to sub-license the image in turn to end-users) is not covered by that contract.

What to make out of that? I don't know. First I'll wait for FT's response to my support ticket, though I do not expect that to clarify much...

1365
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac reaches 1,000,000 images?!
« on: October 22, 2008, 10:03 »
I got basically the same answer and replied back with the questions mentioned here (pirctures shown as anonymous, no credit given to the photographer).
Also I believe this is in violation of the ToS of the Fotolia API, as these do explicitely state that, if using the API, you must make it clear that you are doing so and must mention Fotolia.

Quote from these ToS:
"3.3 Additional License Terms for Partner API.

All users of the Partner API also agree as follows:

(a) You shall not sell Works or allow Works to be downloaded from Your Fotolia API Client. You shall solely use the Partner API to redirect End Users to the Fotolia Website for such End User to purchase or download Works. You shall not use the Partner API to illustrate or provide content to Your Fotolia API Client.

(b) You shall only derive revenue from Your use of the Partner API through Your participation in the Fotolia Affiliation Program. You shall not use the Partner API for any other commercial purpose and no fee shall be charged to End Users that use Your Fotolia API Client.

(c) You shall only derive revenue from the Affiliation Program in accordance with its terms and conditions. You shall only receive payments under the Affiliation Program if the link redirecting the End User to the Fotolia Website contains Your Affiliate ID in the manner described in the Fotolia API Specifications.

(d) You shall display on Your Fotolia API Client at all times a link to the homepage of the Fotolia Website.

(e) Your Fotolia API Client shall be publicly available and not require any login or other type of restricted access credentials. "

End Quote

...what as such is already a bit contradictory to Fotolia's own website, where they also talk about a "reseller API" (see here:
http://us.fotolia.com/Services/API/Introduction) which allows to "sell Royalty Free Images without any mention of Fotolia" - but there is nothing in the API ToS for such Reseller API....

strange as always with Fotolia. Let's wait what the response from FT will be. I proposed to them that they should make a list of partners using the API available on their website, but I doubt they will do...

1366
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac reaches 1,000,000 images?!
« on: October 22, 2008, 04:53 »
I asked them for explanation using their contact form.
And I sent a ticket to FT support.
Let's wait for the answers...

1367
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac reaches 1,000,000 images?!
« on: October 22, 2008, 03:32 »
Same for me, I don't have an account at FP and only started very recently on StockXpert, so it must be Fotolia.

1368
Adobe Stock / Re: Subs. Oh really, not happening to me!
« on: October 19, 2008, 13:23 »
You can opt out only for your exclusive pictures. Everything non-exclusive is available via subs, no choice.

1369
Shutterstock.com / Re: I'm in !!!
« on: October 19, 2008, 13:17 »
thanks for the warm welcome, Peter  :P

1370
Shutterstock.com / Re: I'm in !!!
« on: October 19, 2008, 11:47 »
Thanks for the response.
I've got several hundred files on my harddrive waiting to be uploaded. That's going to keep me busy for some time....

1371
Shutterstock.com / I'm in !!!
« on: October 19, 2008, 11:10 »
Made it. On my first try, 8 of 10 accepted  ;D

Now how long does it take until the files can be found on the site? Doesn't seem to be instantaneous?

1372
you can set your own price for exklusive pictures from bronze on. Every new level gives you one more credit to begin with, so with gold status you can start at 4 credits.

1373
I guess the problem with the automatic translation comes from missing disambiguation  ;D
"Stock"-photographie is originally an English term, but - as many English words - is used in German as well. But "Stock" in German also translates to floor (like the second floor in a building - in German "zweiter Stock").

And I wouldn't interpret that as "Future is negative", but more as "relatively speaking, sales of video and audio will grow a lot stronger than sales of photos".

1374
Correct translation would be (roughly):

"The future lies - beside photos - in stock video and stock audio, and the importance of stock photos will continually decline"

1375
iStockPhoto.com / Re: It's nice to know I'm not alone...........
« on: September 28, 2008, 15:26 »
I contacted support, let's wait what they say...

Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors