MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - wordplanet
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 46
151
« on: February 22, 2022, 22:37 »
I just did a three-word search (Pi Day STEM) and ticked Illustrations and they all showed up. So I guess they are accepted. They've been sitting around on my hard drive for a few years and I kept forgetting to upload them in time. Probably a little late this year but I figured I didn't want to wait until 2023.
152
« on: February 22, 2022, 22:32 »
Hmmmm...I uploaded 11 illustrations today that were immediately accepted. Guess I'll have to go back later and see if they move to a different pile. Haven't uploaded to DT in ages and ages, so I was impressed by the fast acceptance. Will report back if things change.
153
« on: February 22, 2022, 22:12 »
I think DT has always done better in Europe, so maybe that is Yuri's thinking? You have to have so many baskets for your eggs these days as earnings wax and wane ... look at how far ss has fallen while Adobe has taken over the top spot. I'm surprised he's not with Adobe, especially since they have their higher end collections. But I assume those require real exclusivity.
I haven't uploaded to dreamstime in ages, but uploaded 11 files today and the first 7 were accepted while I was finishing checking the keywords on the last 3, which they also took - really fast. And no "similars" issues despite all being the same theme.
Dreamstime is weird for me, I once made $325 on a $750 one-year EL of an image that is one of the highest amounts I've earned on a single license, but usually with my small portfolio of 365 images, I'm lucky to get one payout a year. It's generally my lowest earner. But I don't shoot the same content as Yuri. I'd guess he knows what he's doing.
154
« on: February 22, 2022, 21:23 »
I was going to say Dreamstime too. I believe Adobe also does - they did when they were Fotolia.
155
« on: February 16, 2022, 17:34 »
It always has been feast or famine at Alamy. In January 2021, I had three licenses for $169 each. By comparison, my best license so far this year is $3.90 for an RM image licensed for perpetual use. Views and zooms are climbing but so many of my sales for the past few months have been single-digit. Yet in 2021 sales rebounded earning me nearly as much as back in 2015-2017, my strongest years there. I really don't know what to expect. I've been with Alamy since 2008 so I'm not pulling my portfolio but I'm not uploading anything new at this point.
It's so frustrating. I have a handful of images from 500px on Getty and get pennies whenever they are licensed.
Sad that the more traditional agencies have become microstock.
While writing this, an email popped up from Fine Art America that I sold a puzzle that was discounted 50% due to their Google Ad campaign. With the discount I earned $4.48, a trifle, but better than my most recent full size RM license on Alamy. Earnings on FAA last year blew away all my stock earnings by a mile, as they have for the past few years, even though most print sales were smaller sizes than my average pre-Covid. Why can the average person from places like Tennessee afford to pay more than large corporations for our work? Because places like shutterstock and Getty have given the big guys a tremendous break, at the expense of individual artists. And now Alamy is following suit.
156
« on: February 16, 2022, 16:49 »
I feel a bit of a luddite asking this, but I've been very comfortable using Photoshop CC2015 for so many years, I wonder if I need to update. Can I leave the CC 2015 on my desktop and try the cloud version of Photoshop at the same time? Thanks
I have been able to get through to Adobe when I've had issues, so I'd try to reach them by phone and ask. It's definitely worth upgrading IMHO. FWIW, from my experience, when you update I think it will removes earlier versions unless you tell it not to but it's tricky - so back it up beforehand if you are uncertain. In had PSv6 but in looking at my Applications folder, it isn't there anymore and I'm not sure if that is by choice or not but I have folders labeled Photoshop 2019, 2020, the only things in them are presets, however, in addition to LR CC & LR Classic CC, I still have LR v5, so if you do it correctly you shouldn't lose the older version of PS & LR - I also think when you go to your Adobe Account, you can see the older versions that you bought there BUT I don't think they are supported anymore, so you might lose the updates if you rely on that. Best to backup and/or call Adobe Support for help. In terms of whether it's worth upgrading: Honestly, I'd happily pay for CC if I didn't get it for free the past few years, even the earlier versions are so much better than PS6/LR5 - you can do things in LR Classic with adjustment brushes that you couldn't even do in PS RAW before - I only go into PS when I need more complicated cloning and other things that require layers. It makes your workflow much faster. And the sky replacement and neural filters and better masking etc. in the newer PS versions are really excellent. It's all pretty intuitive if you've been a longtime PS/LR user and Adobe has a ton of tutorials on their site. Lots of creative options - the style neural filters are fun - though I'm mostly using them for fine art - but LR Classic speeds up all kinds of processing from stock to fine art. Good luck!
157
« on: February 16, 2022, 16:28 »
FYI for anyone redeeming a code who has some time left on their existing plan. It does end up tacking 12 months on to the existing expiration date, but for a few nerve-wracking screens it looks as if it didn't work.
I checked my current expiration date (in May 2022) and then went to redeem my code for another 12 months. The redemption was successful but said my service would end on February 2, 2023. I opened up a new tab and went to my Adobe account page and it still showed May 2022. I only have one Adobe account, so there's no possibility to mistakenly redeem in the wrong account.
A few refreshes later (about 2-3 minutes I think) and the Adobe account page updated to show May 2023 as expected.
After all the warnings about making sure you do it correctly because you can't change anything, it would be great if the confirmation page when you redeem could show you - even if it asks you to wait while it updates your account - that you've completed the task as expected.
I had the same experience when I redeemed mine and was relieved when it refreshed since mine was due to end in April.
158
« on: January 31, 2022, 19:49 »
Similar experience. Stopped uploading years ago.
I remember some years ago a gallery I was showing at asked for my 500px account link - so much for the next big thing back then - disappointing. So much unrealized potential.
159
« on: January 31, 2022, 17:37 »
I know I read this a few months late -but thanks so much for sharing the tips re:Arcangel
I've been concentrating much more on fine art this past year with growing sales and I realize that some of my moodier concept art might be right for Arcangel. I've considered applying before but fear of rejection kept me from doing so. Your post has me thinking it should be on my resolutions for 2022 and since it's still January it's a timely goal to add to my list.
Thanks as always for your in-depth report.
160
« on: January 24, 2022, 16:02 »
Rather than start a new thread...
I used the link above to try to opt in for 2021 and it keeps saying there is no Vendor for my SSN & Account # - they are definitely correct. Any thoughts? Just wait for it in the mail? Seems like others had this problem last year too. Any fixes expected?
My Adobe Account # is 9-digits. Copied and pasted from my Contributor ID on my Contributor Tab. Not sure if when I initially signed up with Fotolia I had a shorter/different account # - could that be the issue? I assume the current Contributor ID is the correct one to use.
161
« on: January 24, 2022, 15:34 »
My custom licenses for January range from $0.36 to $2.08 so far. Busiest month on Adobe Stock for me in a while, which is unusual since January has traditionally been very slow, and better earnings than the past few months, with a week still to go. So far, the new custom licenses don't seem to be hurting. Will need more data to be sure. Adobe grew a lot for me in the past year (up 65% from 2020), despite not having added many new images. I only put 3 images into the free collection, so that did not skew my earnings.
Thanks, Mat for your presence here - nice to feel like Adobe has our back. Hope you had a wonderful holiday season with the family. For us, it was so great to be able to travel and see our daughter and grandson after a quiet Christmas in 2020. Though I have to say I was pretty freaked out by the number of maskless folks as we drove cross-country. Fortunately, we all remain Covid-free.
162
« on: January 20, 2022, 18:04 »
Have had a handful of sales with Stockimo, mostly artsy but some editorial too. Most recently, two licenses in 2021, with 138 images, net ranges from $2.64-$25. One image has sold twice (artsy). Fun app. But easier to make $ on Alamy.
Pete, I find it tricky to find my pix on Alamy sometimes too, even when I search using the dropdown "mobile" - I usually have to try different keyword combos. Not sure why.
Not getting any penny sales, so don't know how the shutterstock thing works. You can't opt out from distribution on Stockimo as far as I know, but who would want to opt out from US distributors, which is what you'd have to do?
Thank you, I did do some more searching and using specific title words, I did find my images on Alamy. I wasn't sure if Stockimo had it's own site, and it doesn't. That's what I wondered, they are there on Alamy and I suppose available for image packs and subscriptions?
Just funny that I think the image designation kind of says what I think it looks like? Image ID: S1H1T5 and finding others, Image ID: S3JAGJ and Image ID: S384DW are also mine and it appears that the S is for Stockimo.
Personal use $ 19.99 Presentation or newsletters $ 19.99 Website $ 49.99 Magazines and books $ 69.99 (there are more)
Still I wonder where the cheap sales are coming from. Some examples of the pack pricing.
Presentation or newsletters 5 pack $16.80 per download $83.99
10 pack $14.90 per download $148.99 25 pack $13.96 per download $348.99
Website 5 pack $42.40 per download $211.99 10 pack $37.40 per download $373.99 25 pack $34.96 per download $873.99
Alamy prices for their big clients are sometimes lower than the calculator, they have bulk deals. When Stockimo started they were all $50, and Alamy contributors got 50%. Now most are lower - especially to newspapers. One of my Stockimo images appeared in about 10-15 newspapers around the country and online circa. 2020 - I netted $7.50 as if it was one license, since it went to a large group that owns local papers around the country. But I enjoy playing with my phone pix and it's a fun creative outlet.
163
« on: January 18, 2022, 17:48 »
Really disappointing results - pennies. I don't even bother looking anymore.
164
« on: January 18, 2022, 17:45 »
Have had a handful of sales with Stockimo, mostly artsy but some editorial too. Most recently, two licenses in 2021, with 138 images, net ranges from $2.64-$25. One image has sold twice (artsy). Fun app. But easier to make $ on Alamy.
Pete, I find it tricky to find my pix on Alamy sometimes too, even when I search using the dropdown "mobile" - I usually have to try different keyword combos. Not sure why.
Not getting any penny sales, so don't know how the shutterstock thing works. You can't opt out from distribution on Stockimo as far as I know, but who would want to opt out from US distributors, which is what you'd have to do?
165
« on: January 18, 2022, 16:39 »
I only added 51 new images in 2021, since my efforts were on ventures other than stock photography, but my earnings went up 61%, and I earned the free Adobe software again.
Adobe has shown a commitment to contributors unmatched by any of the other stock sites.
Mat, thanks for all you do - Happy New Year and all the best to you and the rest of the team at Adobe.
166
« on: July 02, 2021, 12:54 »
I only nominated 23 of 85 possibilities, they chose 2 so far, but many of the nominees were older autumn and Christmas-themed images that haven't sold in a while. Hoping more will be chosen by September. I didn't expect a big cash infusion since I chose so few. In retrospect, it would've made sense to choose a lot more if I wanted any kind of meaningful cash infusion.
I've seen a nice uptick in sales on Adobe the past couple of months, including more single sales in the $3-20 range rather than the more common 99 cents per download, so I was reluctant to settle for $5 for images I felt had potential. Only time will tell if I made the right choice but without nominating a large selection, the earnings are really nominal, so I'm thinking maybe I should have taken a chance with more of them.
167
« on: June 19, 2021, 14:10 »
I took a quick look and it appears that photographs downloaded between 1 and 3 times are eligible - is that correct? (I have one that was downloaded 4x but has the nominate button too - guess it may've been downloaded recently).
How does nominating our images for this collection effect the required 150 downloads needed for the year to qualify for the free Adobe CC subscription?
I've had quite a few $3-4 downloads lately and one for $23 last month, so I'm on the fence, but it's nice that you've opened this up as it's an interesting option. May was a really good month for me Adobe, my best ever in fact, despite having not uploaded in months due to an unfortunate reaction to the Covid vaccine which has left me with terrible vertigo. Hoping with PT it will go away but it will probably take several months. So this is a more attractive offer than it would normally be.
Images may be eligible if they have had 4 or less downloads in the past 12 months. Your post is an emotional rollercoaster. Very pleased to see you had such a great May at Adobe Stock and I'm sorry to hear about your adverse reaction.
I hope you recover quickly!
Mat Hayward
Thanks Mat. Been missing the discussion on Discord. It was heartening to have a good May at Adobe when I spent most of it in bed. Be well.
168
« on: June 07, 2021, 15:07 »
I took a quick look and it appears that photographs downloaded between 1 and 3 times are eligible - is that correct? (I have one that was downloaded 4x but has the nominate button too - guess it may've been downloaded recently).
... I have seen files in my port with 20 downloads that are eligible. My guess is it is probably a "download rate" thing. You asked several great questions btw!
Thanks. I saw one with 14 when I looked again ... and another with 77 ... ...so thanks for the explanation Mat.
169
« on: June 07, 2021, 14:26 »
I took a quick look and it appears that photographs downloaded between 1 and 3 times are eligible - is that correct? (I have one that was downloaded 4x but has the nominate button too - guess it may've been downloaded recently).
How does nominating our images for this collection effect the required 150 downloads needed for the year to qualify for the free Adobe CC subscription?
I've had quite a few $3-4 downloads lately and one for $23 last month, so I'm on the fence, but it's nice that you've opened this up as it's an interesting option. May was a really good month for me Adobe, my best ever in fact, despite having not uploaded in months due to an unfortunate reaction to the Covid vaccine which has left me with terrible vertigo. Hoping with PT it will go away but it will probably take several months. So this is a more attractive offer than it would normally be.
170
« on: June 07, 2021, 10:56 »
Thanks for sharing. Inspiring.
171
« on: June 06, 2021, 16:43 »
Nice nature videos - did they sell in May or are they simply new images you shot? Gave you a thumbs up on YouTube.
172
« on: June 06, 2021, 16:36 »
The past two years I've made more on FAA than on any one stock agency. For $30 I find it's more than worth it. Some of what sells is similar to stock - travel tends to do well as framed prints. Illustrations work for products such as masks, pillows, etc. but also sell as prints fairly well. I also sell a lot of images that I would not upload as stock. And, as you can set your own prices, you can feel good about being paid fairly for your work. Although I sell my images directly to local clients, depending on what someone is looking for and where they live, I sometimes send them there instead, since Fine Art America does a good job with printing, framing, etc. I've been with them since 2010, so have had a chance to order various prints and products to check the quality and have used them at times for gallery printing since I am pleased with the quality, as all my clients have been. I suggested aluminum prints to a friend from Georgia recently. She ordered two and liked them so much, she ordered another the following month. In fact, right now, I have a large aluminum panoramic print I ordered from them in a gallery show here in NY. I sent my daughter a puzzle, their latest product, for Christmas and she said the pieces were very nice. I also find the masks easier to breath through and more comfortable on my small face than cloth ones I've ordered from various other vendors this past year. Their greeting cards are good for marketing, nicely printed and they give the title of the image and your name on the back. Most sales I've had are to strangers all over the US and less frequently, Europe. Most sales are framed prints or on aluminum. Most repeat sellers are prints, though I had one illustration that was a repeat seller on masks. I sell a few cards and pillows, occasionally other items, though I find I make more product sales via redbubble where I have a much smaller portfolio. With 784 images, I've been averaging a few sales a month despite these uncertain times, usually netting between $50-250 per print this past year. I found that in 2020 my number of sales increased over 2019, but prints tended to be smaller than before, reflecting the state of the economy I assume. 2021 has been pretty good so far. In all, I've had about 120 sales, very few my first couple of years, but they became more regular once I had about 400-500 images. Early on I found sales dropped when I dropped my prices, the opposite of stock. Here's a link to my images sold collection: https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/marianne-campolongo?tab=artworkgalleries&artworkgalleryid=495197 It gives you a sense of the wide variety of what sells. I have only included images sold to others on the site, and not those I've sold in galleries, etc. Most sales are from people who find the work online via the site. I don't send out a newsletter, but for some years I posted regularly on twitter, facebook, pinterest, (and G+ when it existed), though I'm not sure what effect it had; occasionally I'd find a link between a sale and my efforts. I came to instagram late and without being able to post a working link am not convinced of its efficacy. Compared to stock I think a couple thousand USD a year for less than 800 images is pretty good and sales have been increasing. I've also been approached by outside clients who found my work there, so even as a place to host your work, $30 is a bargain. I pay many times that for my Photoshelter website, which of course allows for many more options. Anyway, that's my two cents. Hope it's helpful.
173
« on: February 01, 2021, 15:11 »
It's a nice perk. That and the webinars, Discord channel camaraderie and challenges were especially appreciated during the past bleak year. Thanks.
Any idea what we'll need to do in 2021 Mat?
I think my free sub expires this month so good to know we'll be getting the new links soon.
174
« on: December 03, 2020, 19:40 »
I'd look forward to anyone here who has found success selling on FAA and Pixels and what kind of things are most likely to create some return? I don't ask for best sellers or specifics, just concepts and what the market actually is?
I've had 30 sales this year, 10 this month, mostly framed prints, welcome but unexpected given the Covid slump. Here's a recent one: https://fineartamerica.com/saleannouncement.html?id=21d6c7bca338cbdda426e3cacb5cd9e3Landscapes (color and black and white) tend to sell pretty well. I also sold a greeting card: https://fineartamerica.com/saleannouncement.html?id=f68dc2022274614cbb857498c6c974a6a couple of masks including this which sold for the third time this year: https://fineartamerica.com/saleannouncement.html?id=77ea5a01b0e7e999cf52405a549b845aAnd a bunch of other nautical and landscape prints. So even in my portfolio there's a wide variety of what sells, but items like the top image sell most often. Fortunately most of my sales are prints which net me anywhere from about $40 for a very small print to a few hundred for larger ones. I uploaded some card and mask-friendly designs since I figure cards and stocking stuffers are a safe bet this time of year, but I only make a buck or two on them, so it is not really worth the trouble, unless someone buys a box of cards. I think even small sales move you up in searches though, so maybe it's worth it. I've been on Fine Art America since 2010 and have seen significant sales growth in recent years, with net income more than doubling each year starting in 2018, while my stock photography income took a big hit in that same time period. I spent time starting in 2017 sharing my work on twitter, pinterest, and G+ when it was around, but many of my recent sales were images that were uploaded fairly recently and which I had not shared on social media. I think it's worthwhile. The next two weeks (along with November) are peak selling times, but you can get sales year-round.
175
« on: December 03, 2020, 19:01 »
I'm primarily a travel and editorial photographer but I shoot a fair amount of nature, both landscapes/seascapes, some weather related images, and detail images of plants and insects. I agree that good shots with precise and accurate captions and keywords sell across various sites.
More than half of my images licensed by Alamy this year were landscape or seascape shots; some of them were licensed for personal use for one-off prints. About one-third of the images that sold on Adobe Stock this year were nature images, including landscapes and flowers. At dreamstime, different images sold, but again nature accounted for about 1/3rd. (When I was with shutterstock, they also sold there).
Nature sells best for me on Fine Art America, a print on demand site that sells photo prints. All types of nature sold there - landscapes, seascapes, flowers/plants, animals, and seashells. 16 out of 30 sales there so far this year were nature, so just over half.
It is essential to caption and keyword accurately and to include the scientific (Latin) name for the trees, flowers, or other plants that are significant in the image, and to include the location if it is relevant. This is the only way your images show up in searches. "Pretty flower" won't cut it, but I'm assuming you know this.
While nature images are not a huge stock sellers, they are evergreen, that is, unlike lifestyle shots, they will keep selling for many years. If your nature images are well composed and interesting, not simply pretty snapshots, and if they are also keyworded well, they should sell.
Good luck!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 46
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|