|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - tickstock
Pages: 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 ... 151
2351
« on: October 03, 2013, 19:14 »
.
2352
« on: October 03, 2013, 19:12 »
.
2353
« on: October 03, 2013, 18:29 »
.
2354
« on: October 03, 2013, 18:18 »
.
2355
« on: October 03, 2013, 18:08 »
.
2356
« on: October 03, 2013, 18:05 »
.
2357
« on: October 03, 2013, 18:00 »
.
2358
« on: October 03, 2013, 17:57 »
.
2359
« on: October 03, 2013, 17:52 »
.
2360
« on: October 03, 2013, 17:49 »
.
2361
« on: October 03, 2013, 17:05 »
.
2362
« on: October 03, 2013, 15:59 »
.
2363
« on: October 03, 2013, 15:38 »
.
2364
« on: October 03, 2013, 15:22 »
.
2365
« on: October 03, 2013, 13:22 »
.
2366
« on: October 03, 2013, 12:59 »
.
2367
« on: October 03, 2013, 12:55 »
.
2368
« on: October 03, 2013, 12:42 »
.
2369
« on: October 03, 2013, 12:31 »
.
2370
« on: October 03, 2013, 12:15 »
.
2371
« on: October 03, 2013, 10:12 »
Id say a thread about royalty rates across the agencies could be an interesting one. Fotolia pays up to 60% for exclusive content and many artists make a full time living supplying only them with RF content. And new files get views and sales. So there are a lot of options.
But I hope this thread gets back to the TOS, on that we agree.
Speaking of the TOS and royalty rates at Shutterstock, you're not allowed. If you want to talk about those things you're going to need an iStock exclusive to do it for you. 
2372
« on: October 03, 2013, 10:02 »
Your files are exclusive to istock, arent they? So getting a higher royalty should be expected. But why dont you demand a royalty of say - 50% - for your exclusive content? The same rate stocksy is now paying out.
SS is paying a decent rate for non exclusive content.
Anyway this thread was about the TOS changes on SS that dont affect you as an istock exclusive. For a debate on royalties, why not open a new thread?
I didn't take this thread off topic, you can see Luis brought up royalty rates for iStock, someone else brought up the Google deal, etc.. I'd rather talk about the TOS in this thread, it seems that might not be possible though. If you want to discuss other issues in appropriate threads I'd be happy to.
2373
« on: October 03, 2013, 09:42 »
actually tickstock I believe you should clean your mouth before talking about SS and the fact that we need to get together and fight for changes when you are represented by the shameless iStock made by Getty that pay the lowest royalties of the all industry and pulls shady deals for contributors one after another, you should think twice before saying where we should or shouldn't contribute to, truly pathetic in fact what you said here
I didn't say you should do anything. Also my royalty rate is much higher than what Shutterstock is paying.
2374
« on: October 03, 2013, 09:34 »
So you don't care if Shutterstock is giving away your images for free?
Just like iStock has given themselves the right to do with promotional files.
Pssst. TS, Google deal????Heard of that?
Those weren't free either.
6 dollars for 400 million users is free imo... and my 1.3 million downloads on the microsoft deal were never paid for. not even 6 dollars.
I agree 'paying' for promotional use doesn't mean much when it's a deal like the Google one, but the images for the Google deal were paid.
2375
« on: October 03, 2013, 09:29 »
glad I own a couch and a few chairs 
I wouldn't expect anything more from you Luis.
Pages: 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 ... 151
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
