|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - borg
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 68
276
« on: November 29, 2012, 12:51 »
Finally something good!
Who knows maybe one day I will start to promote more my Fotolia portfolio if FT becomes place with better deal for us!
277
« on: November 28, 2012, 14:01 »
I'm going to miss, but who cares if it will be one percent more or less...
278
« on: November 24, 2012, 11:15 »
Just another apocalyptic topic...  Will marketing die? I don't think so...
279
« on: November 21, 2012, 14:46 »
Our cut is -16,66%!
280
« on: November 20, 2012, 15:31 »
50:50 is still good deal, but definitely is not move in the right way...
281
« on: November 20, 2012, 07:18 »
Agencies are in war for existing customers with our money...
Probably they are struggling for new buyers, but there is no new market field for that, photo stock is an old business...
Also, they can not bring new customers for us without our loss on other agencies...
So, this will be profitable only for marketing companies...
282
« on: November 20, 2012, 06:51 »
Alamy! Big Welcome on the Dark side! 
283
« on: November 15, 2012, 04:27 »
Old sayings: "Don't put all eggs in just one bakset!"
284
« on: November 08, 2012, 16:45 »
Max 169 dls!
285
« on: November 07, 2012, 07:17 »
I don't think that Jon have to put our cash into his bag and ride his bicycle over Manhattan to the Paypal HQ...
Will be as usual!
LOL, HQ is in San Jose, will take him a while then
I think that Carrie (Sex and City) has illegal "Paypal office" in her flat! ;-)
286
« on: November 06, 2012, 17:10 »
I don't think that Jon have to put our cash into his bag and ride his bicycle over Manhattan to the Paypal HQ...
Will be as usual!
287
« on: November 05, 2012, 16:45 »
I can't find stock chart od SS...
Does anyone have a link?
288
« on: November 03, 2012, 04:20 »
Also, what is with red and green arrows in Poll Results?
289
« on: November 03, 2012, 04:15 »
If I understand correctly the formula the OP wants us to use is RPI=(total $ made so far this year/images online)/month of the year
Someone with 2000 images online, making 1000 dollar per month has an RPI of 50 cent. Someone with 3000 images online making 3000 dollar per month has an RPI of 1 dollar. So if you have 7000 images online making 3500 a month its still only an RPI of 50 cent. I guess the dollar is not too low.
Then I must have miscalculated. I calculate RPI by dividing the monthly income at a site, by how many images I have on that site during that month. The way the OP suggest doesn't make sense to me.
I'm always amazed how most people have a "superficial" knowledge of elementary mathematics... Or that often might be characteristic of "artistic soul"... ! 
Lisa, leave it them in their "condition"... That was job of their teachers in elementary school... They were payed for that!
I think that is reason why World is in crisis, nobody knows anything, but they think they deserve excellent standard! And probably they are local patriots!
All I did was explain what the OP posted. No need to come here and be a pr*ck just because I am clarifying something. Cheers.
In fact, my post was not directed toward you, rather than general (for this kind of debate) ...As Lisa said "it doesn't make sense", I am sorry...
Well its quite confusing to speak in general but quote my calculations and make denigrating comments. So I took it you were talking about me, since you quoted me.
Yes it' looks like, but my quote was on Lisa's post ( and yours were in it)... Lisa has patience to explain everything, but sometimes it seems that some of us only want to provoke good informations, without asking, especially newbies... So, apologize again...
290
« on: November 02, 2012, 17:01 »
If I understand correctly the formula the OP wants us to use is RPI=(total $ made so far this year/images online)/month of the year
Someone with 2000 images online, making 1000 dollar per month has an RPI of 50 cent. Someone with 3000 images online making 3000 dollar per month has an RPI of 1 dollar. So if you have 7000 images online making 3500 a month its still only an RPI of 50 cent. I guess the dollar is not too low.
Then I must have miscalculated. I calculate RPI by dividing the monthly income at a site, by how many images I have on that site during that month. The way the OP suggest doesn't make sense to me.
I'm always amazed how most people have a "superficial" knowledge of elementary mathematics... Or that often might be characteristic of "artistic soul"... !
Lisa, leave it them in their "condition"... That was job of their teachers in elementary school... They were payed for that!
I think that is reason why World is in crisis, nobody knows anything, but they think they deserve excellent standard! And probably they are local patriots!
All I did was explain what the OP posted. No need to come here and be a pr*ck just because I am clarifying something. Cheers.
In fact, my post was not directed toward you, rather than general (for this kind of debate) ...As Lisa said "it doesn't make sense", I am sorry...
291
« on: November 02, 2012, 06:52 »
If I understand correctly the formula the OP wants us to use is RPI=(total $ made so far this year/images online)/month of the year
Someone with 2000 images online, making 1000 dollar per month has an RPI of 50 cent. Someone with 3000 images online making 3000 dollar per month has an RPI of 1 dollar. So if you have 7000 images online making 3500 a month its still only an RPI of 50 cent. I guess the dollar is not too low.
Then I must have miscalculated. I calculate RPI by dividing the monthly income at a site, by how many images I have on that site during that month. The way the OP suggest doesn't make sense to me.
I'm always amazed how most people have a "superficial" knowledge of elementary mathematics... Or that often might be characteristic of "artistic soul"... ! Lisa, leave it them in their "condition"... That was job of their teachers in elementary school... They were payed for that! I think that is reason why World is in crisis, nobody knows anything, but they think they deserve excellent standard! And probably they are local patriots!
292
« on: November 01, 2012, 03:58 »
Usual the best month, but this year 10% worse than September...
293
« on: October 30, 2012, 15:54 »
+1
294
« on: October 22, 2012, 06:24 »
Likely next weekend!
295
« on: October 18, 2012, 07:41 »
My sales on DT are catastrophic... 
296
« on: October 18, 2012, 03:39 »
I am doing on FT quite fine!
Last several days have been very good on Depositphoto...
But, DT is tanking for me, every day more and more!
This was the way earlier in the year for me also (relatively speaking of course) but FT have died back a lot and DT has come back to the sort of levels I'd expect and a clear #2 after SS.
Maybe they are all connected!
297
« on: October 16, 2012, 16:22 »
I am doing on FT quite fine!
Last several days have been very good on Depositphoto...
But, DT is tanking for me, every day more and more!
298
« on: October 10, 2012, 02:54 »
Maybe referrals ?
299
« on: October 06, 2012, 06:40 »
Who cares for RCs...!?
16%-17% or 18%...
It does not matter...
300
« on: October 05, 2012, 07:13 »
What we only need to know are average RPI-s of RM and RF portfolios...
Only difference between those two measures might worth something...
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 68
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
