276
General Stock Discussion / Re: Working with models - please help
« on: January 13, 2014, 07:58 »
Use yourself and family members it's free!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 276
General Stock Discussion / Re: Working with models - please help« on: January 13, 2014, 07:58 »
Use yourself and family members it's free!
277
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock - New presentation of the Portfolio page« on: January 12, 2014, 18:30 »
Discussed in November of last year.
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=132940&highlight=thumbnails 278
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock - New presentation of the Portfolio« on: January 12, 2014, 12:53 »
Top right near the corner is a way to select from three sizes.
279
Off Topic / Re: NFL Playoffs Fantasy Football - Now Playing...« on: January 12, 2014, 12:50 »
And as I said someone took off!
danno1265's picks 280
Off Topic / Re: NFL Playoffs Fantasy Football - Now Playing...« on: January 12, 2014, 10:14 »
No San Fran quarterback has ever won two playoff games on the road.
281
Off Topic / Re: Major Meteor Shows 2014« on: January 11, 2014, 11:14 »
I might just catch one if those this year?
282
Off Topic / Re: NFL Playoffs Fantasy Football - Now Playing...« on: January 11, 2014, 10:02 »
Nah after today someone will take off big time.
Last I looked, at least five people had Charles. I wasn't one of them. Give it a week to settle in, it's going to be close because of the short playoff season. 283
Shutterstock.com / Re: S J Locke Uploading to Shutterstock« on: January 10, 2014, 18:29 »
No Mechanics do not wear coveralls of any type and haven't since back in the 70's!
Trust me on this I am an Auto Tech and have been for more then 30 years and I myself never wore coveralls but the Man who taught me did and he was what we could call an old timer. In today's world Mechanics dress in nice uniforms with nothing on them to scratch the cars paint when leaning over them and they must wear safety shoes of some type. They have also been getting relaxed in lots of shops and are allowing techs to wear T-shirts and shorts! So forget the coveralls that is a thing of the past and can actually be very dangerous because you have more clothing on for moving parts to grab onto and pull you into harms way!!!! Good luck Sean, I'm sure you will be pleasantly surprised at your returns on SS with the rep you have and your port. I'm only a small fish but compared to what IS does and is doing, real professionalism is plain to see. Enjoy your success. SS is really not a bad company.7 year old images also show 7 year old clothing, hairstyles and interiors. Lifestyle is the toughest category, and Seans 7 year old images will be competing against new fresh up to date content, and millions of it. Its not going to be an easy ride, but I am sure with more and new content he will make a decent return. 284
Off Topic / Re: NFL Playoffs Fantasy Football« on: January 10, 2014, 12:14 »
Yeah and I had Charles!
If he hadn't been taken out guess where I would be? But hey this week is a new one again and I had some moved down but I have found out how to easily score big time now will I do that or do it my way? ![]() Hey who's in last. (not including the girl that joined late, and the "bad cat" with zero's) Why it's some guy Hodag named Pete! 286
Shutterstock.com / Re: S J Locke Uploading to Shutterstock« on: January 09, 2014, 16:17 »What image doesn't have a release?My bad I see they do have releases. 287
Shutterstock.com / Re: S J Locke Uploading to Shutterstock« on: January 09, 2014, 16:05 »
Captcha is nothing
How did he get images of a clearly visible GM SUV accepted as non editorial? ![]() And how did he get people accepted with no model release? ![]() 288
Off Topic / Re: Icy Cold in Chicago« on: January 09, 2014, 09:56 »
Yesterday morning and the morning before were way colder then anything today!
Your a day late and a dollar short. 289
Shutterstock.com / Re: Whole batch random rejection, twice.« on: January 09, 2014, 09:46 »
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=134469
Now if you do as stated in the above link you will get the answers you need. Post here and follow the posting instructions. http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=4 290
General Stock Discussion / Re: Arcurs article about photographing with phones« on: January 06, 2014, 12:36 »
Images taken with the Iphone and Galaxy phones are about the best out there and are and have been being accepted at SS and elsewhere and that new Nokia phone isn't too bad either.
291
Shutterstock.com / Re: Success at last« on: January 04, 2014, 00:10 »
Say What?
![]() Shadows will pass at SS as will shallow DOF images. Just has to be done properly. 292
Shutterstock.com / Re: Questions Questions Questions - What % of your IMAGES are US Source in 2013?« on: January 02, 2014, 21:21 »
Look it works!
![]() Uh they send the kids to school and then the cafeteria with knives and forks and yes let us not forget the pens and pencils! I get on all of my daughters school teachers about that and explain that there are so many weapons they allow in school and or already have in school but yet a plastic army man with a gun is considered carrying a weapon on school property and punishable!? Go figure! STUPIDITY! I carry a Swiss Army Knife, have since about the time of your experience. Some of the security regulations are stupid and accomplish nothing, but to aggravate people. At the courthouse they were taking away nail clippers with files on them. Federal courthouse building, you can't have a pen knife. (trip back to the car to leave my knife, should I forget, at all of these places) 293
General Stock Discussion / Re: A nice adventure« on: December 24, 2013, 11:59 »
Simple dont submit to FT.
295
Shutterstock.com / Re: 500 error again?« on: December 20, 2013, 16:29 »
phpBB : Critical Error
Could not connect to the database 296
Shutterstock.com / Re: Now accepting: "illustrative" editorial images« on: December 20, 2013, 13:29 »
Just submitted a first illustrative editorial to see how it goes along with the following note to reviewer.
This is a new illustrative editorial as announced today by Scott please see below. Quote from: scottbraut Hello, EDITORIAL UPDATE 12/20/13 http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=133925 http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/announcing-shutterstocks-new-editorial-guidelines 297
Shutterstock.com / Re: Now accepting: "illustrative" editorial images« on: December 20, 2013, 12:09 »
But you cant have hundreds of isolated images of the same object if the people dont have the discontinued product unless they were to go out and buy something that used to cost $2 but now because it is discontinued people are selling what they have for well over $50.
298
Shutterstock.com / Re: Now accepting: "illustrative" editorial images« on: December 20, 2013, 11:45 »
Kids are OK from what I have heard from SS.
299
Shutterstock.com / Re: Now accepting: "illustrative" editorial images« on: December 20, 2013, 11:33 »
Question?
What about Isolated illustrative editorials? Such as a product no longer available on the market that can be used to illustrate discontinued products due to environmental hazards or from discontinued production to introduce a new line to be produced? And will this also apply to video? Many questions can possibly come up. Happy Holidays back atcha. 300
General Stock Discussion / Re: Most Photographed Places« on: December 15, 2013, 21:48 »
I am in an area that is not very photographed but is world rank: 2119 and another that is world rank: 2820 and world rank: 2926 and as well as world rank: 25.
|
|