MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gcrook

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13]
301
New Sites - General / Re: Is this legit?
« on: November 23, 2014, 23:29 »
Doesn't make any sense whatsoever.



302
This year in $ for me is
1 Shutterstock
2 Dissolve
3 Pond5

The other agencies combined is less than half of P5 sales.

Dissolve ranking between ss and p5 is interesting.Have been considering them,but skipped last step of signing to their terms untl they make a contributor page,and the pricing was also an issue.
For me it's p5 2X-5X the amount of sales ss makes.
Would it be possible to post a link to your port here or via pm?

303
I checked my paypal balance again and found something rather interesting that i had overlooked.
Next to my payment from ME there is an ISSUE REFUND button,something i have never seen in any payment i have received from anywhere,let alone from stock.
That practically makes me the seller,and paypal fees are charged upon me.
That's not paypal's fault,it seems that it's propably the dealing ME did with paypal,somehow declaring me as the seller and them the buyer.

I have never sold through paypal so it would be nice if someone with seller experience can clarify if my hypothesis is correct.
And if that's true are there any legal implications?
No curation and me being the seller could for example mean that ME doesnt take blame if i accidentally sell editorial as commercial and someone decides to sue?

Expect official confirmation on this.


304
Confirm there was also a 1.75usd paypal fee for the one and only clip i sold at ME after 3 months with full port (+-300 clips) and relative high prices set (SS level prices more or less).
Of course low to non-existent sales is propably to be expected,and i wouldn't bother at all to upload if ME were to have fixed prices and low commissions,so i will just  leave my port there for the time being.
Lots of views btw but it doesnt seem to mean much.

I am bringing up this thread to address some issues i find rather disturbing.
First of all there seems to be no kind of curation at all,and if there is any, there is no way to know if content was curated and if changes were made,although i don't think this is the case.
Second of all categorization is just absurd,but i don't know if that indexing has any meaning to search results so i just mention it as an aesthetic issue to me.

What i really dont like is that there is a character cap in the description.Some files just need more words to be described,and some words get cut.
Again no indication,you submit and then check your clip's name to see how many characters above limit you are.

And the latest thing where when you set your price the "free" box gets automatically ticked and you need to untick it (if you notice it before clicking the publish button) is just plain sleazy.

305
Quote

That is not the point. The point is that e.g. SS may be forced to adjust their prices/royalties in order to stay competitive and then you'll lose big time. Don't do anything to undercut the market leaders, because when they'll 'undercut' you it will be game over.

I'll repeat, if the garbage sites went out of business or were forced to raise their prices/royalties, video producers would gain the most. If you don't help the garbage sites grow their collections, they would have to do something positive for the contributors. That is elementary.

Pardon me, but this kind of logic that says "hey lets play nice with the big guys" ,i never understood.
And its s bit contradictive as well.So you are saying that big companies tend to be more "ethical" towards their contributors when there is little to no competition,and harsh cruel and unfair when there is more competiton?

Anyway i dont want to get too political about it,but after SS (which mostly sucks for me for various reasons- but makes sales at least- ) and p5 (which happens to be stellar) i find myself uploading to ME (waiting to see how it goes,i have mixed feelings about this one and wouldn't bother if it wasn't for the setting your own price rule and 50% cut) and i am also uploading to clipcanvas.

I will propably check revostock and maybe depositphotos next year and upload a very small and 'safe" portion of my collection there to test the waters.

306
123RF / Re: is 123rf a worthy-to-upload stock agence?
« on: October 10, 2014, 20:09 »
How about video footage?What are the royalties for hd and 4k does anyone have personal experience with sales and commission at 123rf?
I have subscribed but i've been postponing to upload there.

the few i have gotten have been in the $20 range.....low $20's.

That doesn't seem so bad.These are SS level commissions.May i ask mantis how do sales there fare to other agencies? (dont know if you upload to p5 or ss or any others)

307
123RF / Re: is 123rf a worthy-to-upload stock agence?
« on: October 10, 2014, 18:17 »
How about video footage?What are the royalties for hd and 4k does anyone have personal experience with sales and commission at 123rf?
I have subscribed but i've been postponing to upload there.

308
New Sites - General / Re: new site stocktal
« on: September 22, 2014, 11:55 »
I browsed the site a coupe of weeks ago and there were a few videos there,some of which had sales!...?
No videos now.Anyone has any idea what is going on there?I looks promising for videos,at least to test the waters,but they seem to have eliminated that option.

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors