MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - SuperPhoto
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 47
301
« on: May 31, 2024, 12:50 »
While I don't know the specific circumstances surrounding this - people 'should' be building their own websites/customer lists/etc to prevent that kind of thing from happening...
302
« on: May 31, 2024, 10:24 »
Just wondering whether anyone else had this happen, and/or just curious what the significance is?
Periodically (not often, just 'every now and then') - I'll notice my 'illustrations' or 'photo' count seems to go down... are images/assets being removed? Or... what is happening with that? Thanks!
303
« on: May 30, 2024, 08:36 »
The first of all, everyone who use Midjourney, could get images with THE SAME QUALITY. WHY I produce 100k simlilar files? I produce 4 images in one prompt. I dont use any repeated prompts unless the images are really good at selling.
When you have more than 100000 or 200000 or more ai images, WHAT TO CREATE is meaningless. I CREATE EVERY THING.
Well, yes, not only you but everyone can create anything, this is no more a breaking news, it's more than one year that Midjourney is on its way. And in one year we saw boith traditional photography and AI images that sells well. So I'm not agree with you, what you're talking aboout is quite overtaked... There are actually billions of AI images in Adobestock and, you guess, traditional photography is still selling. Sorry but I'm not agree with you, you seems to be a little outdated. Actually the best sellers are quality images not quantity, as quantity is something that anyone can have access to. My opinion, of course
One BIG thing is... people should be focusing on getting midjourney to pay authors RETROACTIVELY for the STOLEN works they made their tool based on, as well as set up a system for RECURRING PERPETUAL works going forward. discuss that. that is effective.
I agree with you but unfortunately this will never happen.
regarding AI content,quantity is certainly the winning strategy.
better to generate many more than you need and then carefully select the best ones,rather than waste too much time in postproduction.
I have recently developed a new system in postproduction,which allows me to speed up my work considerably,whilst maintaining an excellent standard of quality.
It took me several tries and several steps before I achieved this strategy,but it works,my approval rate is very high,and the content is of excellent quality,but above all I can go much faster now. 
Why do you believe that, and believe you could speak on behalf of an entire industry? It would only 'never happen' if no one did anything and just whined and complained. Of course it can happen and it will happen, providing people first become aware of it as a possibility (in process), and then people taking coordinated action. Then it will happen. And authors will be compensated retroactively for their stolen works, as well as receive perpetual revenue in the future should they choose to license those works going forward.
304
« on: May 29, 2024, 11:05 »
The first of all, everyone who use Midjourney, could get images with THE SAME QUALITY. WHY I produce 100k simlilar files? I produce 4 images in one prompt. I dont use any repeated prompts unless the images are really good at selling.
When you have more than 100000 or 200000 or more ai images, WHAT TO CREATE is meaningless. I CREATE EVERY THING.
Well, yes, not only you but everyone can create anything, this is no more a breaking news, it's more than one year that Midjourney is on its way. And in one year we saw boith traditional photography and AI images that sells well. So I'm not agree with you, what you're talking aboout is quite overtaked... There are actually billions of AI images in Adobestock and, you guess, traditional photography is still selling. Sorry but I'm not agree with you, you seems to be a little outdated. Actually the best sellers are quality images not quantity, as quantity is something that anyone can have access to. My opinion, of course
One BIG thing is... people should be focusing on getting midjourney to pay authors RETROACTIVELY for the STOLEN works they made their tool based on, as well as set up a system for RECURRING PERPETUAL works going forward. discuss that. that is effective.
305
« on: May 29, 2024, 07:35 »
My educated guess would be probably he 'made' between $10-$15k usd with that strategy (over 1-1.5 years, or since whenever he started doing the AI stuff)... Now, whether that is 'worth' it, I dunno... There's people with 1/20th the size in portfolio (or even smaller) who do exactly the same revenue, or better.
It depends on: a) Is it in demand/useful content? b) Does it get discovered (i.e., 'unique', good promotion/etc) c) Then some images just tend to get really lucky and go on wild selling streaks, doesn't seem to be any reason why, it just happens (i.e., say 1k+ sales for a single image)...
So if he is just spamming the crap out of the images, hoping something sticks - while that is certainly 'one' strategy... not sure if it is the most effective strategy... Now of course, if he has really top notch images, that is a different thing... but not sure whether that is the case from the sounds of it...
306
« on: May 26, 2024, 08:56 »
Vegan Wars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGsW0yLYao0
Deepfakes, or the technological art of confusing minds willing to let themselves be manipulated, have never made me smile or laugh.
Distorting reality is only funny when the maneuver is visible and understandable to everyone. Perverting or polluting it will perhaps dissuade some people from being informed and educated by screens. The worst is that we will call into question the visual testimony of truth, of reality, of the historical past or of distant events.
Last 3-4 years was quite an eye-awaking experience, including the fact that that particular type of manipulation is nothing new... and it's been used by the mass media for quite some time (50+ years)... this is just a new "tool" in their arsenal... I suspect part of the reason the "general" populace now has access to it is because the consoritorium of oligarchs are REALLY trying hard to push the "digitalID" for your "safety & security", which has absolutely nothing to do with safety, nor security - but rather control (and trying to prevent other people from acquiring wealth and power)... as was pointed out by someone to me recently - the same people (head's of certain companies) pushing for "ai regulation" are the same people that are profiting massively from it...
307
« on: May 26, 2024, 08:49 »
... don't get hung up on these details "skip the photoshoot".
it's just a promotional slogan,it's not intended to offend or undermine photographers,it's simply what it is,with Firefly you can skip the photoshoot,it's simply reality!
I agree with you. It's making a big issue out of really nothing, some people looking to be offended and feel self righteous about. Also though - generally speaking it is a 'business tactic' some heads of certain corporations use to attack other corporations - and there is one specific culture that uses it as an actual TACTIC (attempting to discredit competitors to affect stock prices/shares/etc while simultaneously pretending to be a 'victim') - and lol - some people get SUPER "offended" about it if you say what their background is because they've been PROGRAMMED to act that way through schooling (look @ the ppl running midjourney/chatgpt/bloomberg/etc - what do they all have in common?). It's SUPER ODD "nobody" is saying anything about Midjourney (which is based on theft), ChatGPT (which is based on theft)... but "nobody" in the media is complaining about actual theft (hint: the "media" companies owned by the same people running/promoting the chatgpt/midjourney)... but instead whining about "being offended" by a ridiculous thing they shouldn't be "offended" by...
308
« on: May 25, 2024, 19:08 »
Sounds like 6 or 7 year old female child wrote it.
Ugh. Why on earth did you feel the need to write female there?
"ugh." why on earth you did you feel the need to feel offended because that was written there?
(a) because it actually was written by a female. read the signature. (b) because it sounds like it was written by a female. if it sounded like it was written by a male, I would have said that instead.
the significance of that statement is the age. the letter sounds like it was written by an impetuous female child throwing a temper tantrum, not written by a mature woman with a well thought out letter, detailing specifically exactly how a particular ad campaign actually effects other photographers, and a specific resolution of what she would request by done on behalf of the members to having a more amicable business relationship going forward.
the is very immature letter and sounds like it is written by a female child throwing a temper tantrum because her feelings were hurt, and she wants to take her ball and go home.

haha  Vegan Wars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGsW0yLYao0
309
« on: May 25, 2024, 08:12 »
Sounds like 6 or 7 year old female child wrote it.
Ugh. Why on earth did you feel the need to write female there?
"ugh." why on earth you did you feel the need to feel offended because that was written there? (a) because it actually was written by a female. read the signature. (b) because it sounds like it was written by a female. if it sounded like it was written by a male, I would have said that instead. the significance of that statement is the age. the letter sounds like it was written by an impetuous female child throwing a temper tantrum, not written by a mature woman with a well thought out letter, detailing specifically exactly how a particular ad campaign actually effects other photographers, and a specific resolution of what she would request by done on behalf of the members to having a more amicable business relationship going forward. the is very immature letter and sounds like it is written by a female child throwing a temper tantrum because her feelings were hurt, and she wants to take her ball and go home.
310
« on: May 25, 2024, 06:53 »
why, Adobe, would you dismiss and discount all that your most fervent and loyal customers aspire to?
There is a simple answer to that: Because they aim at replacing us with new customers. The customers who don't need any real skills and talent and just click a few buttons to have Adobe produce some AI "photo" for them. Everyone can do that, so a much bigger potential customer base to make money from.
More specifically - it's probably the blackrock/vanguard conglomerate with some moles working at adobe, trying to hurt their public image. (Sometimes the people being used know what they are doing, sometimes they don't know they are being used). Blackrock/vanguard are funding (directly/indirectly) competing services like midjourney/chatGPT/etc - and you don't see them getting the same kind of flack. Partially because blackrock/vanguard (more specifically, many of the people running those corporations which engage in major theft and deception, also in a big part responsible for the nonsensical marching orders to corporations for the evil diapers on people's faces), because if I recall correctly - larry fink (ceo) had sent out a letter to most of the fortunte 500 companies with a veiled threat of 'do this, or else' (which also includes the insanely stupid, but very targeted 'attacks against caucasians' campaign) - they also run the newspapers that promote midjourney/chatGPT and are trying to discredit adobe. If anyone should be being 'attacked', it should be services like midjourney. Or chatGPT. Services based pretty much ENTIRELY upon theft. But you don't see that, do you? Also - look at who runs midjourney/blackrock/bloomberg/etc - specifically the 'religion' or 'culture' background (whatever you want to call it). Very significant - because that is one of the modus operandi of that culture. Discredit those they don't like in order to attack them, while simulanteously playing the part of a victim. It appears to be a corporate attack.
311
« on: May 25, 2024, 06:49 »
That particular letter is poorly written and very ineffective. It doesn't really serve any purpose at all. Sounds like 6 or 7 year old female child wrote it.
It is a waste of time, essentially a pouty letter, saying "hmm! we are mad. Bleah! So THERE!".
Also - if the author, acting on behalf of that organization is "mad" at adobe - because they 'perceive' it to be an 'attack' - how about the ACTUAL corporations like midjourney which are OPENLY STEALING and attacking photographers? Midjourney's "business model" is based pretty much ENTIRELY OFF OF THEFT. That is how the images are "created" - STOLEN images. Other google funded services (i.e., some of the vidgen stuff) is also 100% based off of THEFT... Go after THOSE companies. The ones ACTUALLY STEALING AND "attacking" photographers and videographers.
312
« on: May 24, 2024, 10:01 »
I have a portfolio I think of a few thousand assets there (both video & pictures), and strangely enough don't really see any sales there (haven't the last couple years). Not sure what is going on there end, not sure if anyone is earning anything significantly there, but seems to be a bit of a waste of time...
313
« on: May 22, 2024, 08:59 »
Yes, it's very slow + sometimes doesn't load at all.
I suspect someone is probably hammering the site (dos attacks/etc).
314
« on: May 20, 2024, 11:12 »
We should all boycott agencies like iStock that don't respect us and our work. Both for videos and images. I mean, 15% commission?!? Who are we, their slaves?
Slaves are not paid anything.
hehe. actually most people are slaves, and don't realize it. Just because you don't have the "ball/chain" as portrayed in the movies, doesn't mean you arne't a slave... what do you call people who work in an office, 'voluntarily' give 50% of their income to some unnamed agency/person to do with as they please, use the remaining 50% to pay for their own lodging, own food, and if they are lucky, get two weeks off for good behaviour? lol... what do you think the "masks" were all about the last 3-4 years? they were for the slaves, and most obediently put it on (stupid as it was) for 'fear of being punished'... I never wore one, it was stupid, as well as being very wrong. shoving a stick up the nose also had nothing to do about 'health' - it was 'breaking in the slaves'/trying to break their willpower... (like seriously - if there was a 'dangerous virus' - why could you 'cough' and a speckle of it could 'infect' someone - yet you had to shove a stick so far up your head to touch your brain to see if you had anything? certainly wasn't about "health"...)... "slaves" in some respects as potrayed in the movies had it a little better, at least their accomodations + food were paid for...
315
« on: May 19, 2024, 19:37 »
Sunday at 5 pm I checked my weekly position and it was blank - previous week is closed and I didnt sell anything for the next week yet. Curious thats the first time that I saw my position as blank.
Must mean you are invisible! OH NOES! Lol. In seriousness, no - it seems there are 1-2 hrs on a sunday from when it closes out the week and makes a new ranking. If you don't sell anything in that 1-2 hrs, then its 'blank'.
316
« on: May 17, 2024, 22:09 »
Good week so far after a bad week.
Impressive ! And your graph is so steady! (Mine is totally up and down) With those downloads, its not a surprise that you are in 1000 weekly. Congratulations!
Thank you!! My production of AI images have slowed down for the last 2 months. So, I got stuck at the same level. I got to diversify my AI portfolio to go above 1,000th. That's my goal this year.
How do you come up with saleable concepts?
317
« on: May 16, 2024, 08:09 »
I just checked and Motion Array did take down the portfolio but Videohive did not... they just changed the name of the portfolio
What is the new name on envato?
318
« on: May 16, 2024, 08:08 »
Yep, I had the same happen. I had removed the meta data from my images (I just don't like having all the flash settings/camera type/etc stored in it), and they were not accepted... Very odd.
319
« on: May 14, 2024, 20:17 »
My point would be, not denying what you have observed, honest or not, or however you want to label your comments about the truth and reality of things.
You can attack a subject, or an activity, and point out something is wrong, without calling out an entire group of people, for what some individuals do.
I am not politically correct or woke, but I do stand up when it comes to generalizations about entire cultures, races, regions or religions, based on a smaller number of that population who are anti-social, criminal or only see the world, from a self-serving perspective.
I did articulate that it did not apply to 'everyone'. However, the statements are based off of actual data, correlation between specific types of people who do that, personal experience in working with/dealing a number of different races & cultures, as well as open discussions with a number of people who openly admit that's precisely the kind of thing they do - and it for the most part actually does apply to the majority. 'Stereotypes' are stereotypes for a reason, because they do tend to be accurate, or wouldn't have become a stereotype. Glad to hear you aren't "woke" though lol. (I admit - 4 years ago when the media started publishing being "awake" and "woke" I thought they were the same thing - thinking someone 'woke up' and was now 'awake', not realizing of course they are in many ways polar opposites). But then I suppose that is why some (of course, not all - because some microstockers are very intelligent) - but referrering specifically to some microstockers are on here whining & complaining like children, because they are not international businessmen, but rather hoping they can stick their head in the sand and if they throw a big enough tantrum, someone might do something. But I'll agree with that one!  [/quote] Sounds good!
320
« on: May 13, 2024, 20:46 »
Thanks for noticing. I was wondering how many East Indians are Jews? Oh I see, it's those two groups and probably more.
My view is, it's unnecessary to blame and label people for origins or their ethnicity or religion as the cause of problems in the stock industry or our business.
Could we stick to business and AI an skip the personal attacks?
Lol, hey pete. Not sure if you are trolling, just bored - or genuinely curious to the answer to your question. That question I don't know - I 'spose you could take a poll? If someone gets upset at stating the obvious - it's like saying "hey, that car is GREEN!". And then someone replying "OMFG! yOU ARE an ANTI-GREEN CAR person! OMFG! ANTI-GREEN! ANTI GREEN! ANTI-GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" (Which lol - in itself makes no sense - because you simply stated a car was green. One could argue that you are actually PRO green because you made people aware of the lovely greenness of the car). It is significant understanding how different sets of people conduct business. Like, using a different example - if you went to China to do a business deal, and the first thing you did was to start discussing business, you'd have a very short trip. It's not how Chinese businessmen conduct business. It's relevant to understand what types of individuals/groups/background are responsible for certain things in order to deal with it effectively. Otherwise - ignoring how a different culture/person/etc conducts business because you'd don't want to be "perceived" as some label (which - actually IS a "business tactic" employed by some groups - making ppl 'fearful' to be 'labelled' a certain way state the obvious) is actually rather foolish. But then I suppose that is why some (of course, not all - because some microstockers are very intelligent) - but referrering specifically to some microstockers are on here whining & complaining like children, because they are not international businessmen, but rather hoping they can stick their head in the sand and if they throw a big enough tantrum, someone might do something. Thing is - if one wants to stick their head in the sand and figuratively go 'la la la la la can't hear you la la la la!' - while that is their prerogative - one should be aware that the different people/groups/etc find that incredibly funny and certainly would take advantage of a person who conducts business "that" way...
321
« on: May 13, 2024, 09:46 »
probably because shutterstock doesn't care, has done a lot of unethical things in the past, continues to do so now.
322
« on: May 13, 2024, 09:45 »
yes, definitely a visually disgusting ad. btw, it's funny - after they got rid of steve jobs - the "innovation" (at least for consumer products for iPhones/iPads) has been next to nil. who cares about 1mm 'thinner', etc?
323
« on: May 12, 2024, 22:48 »
i managed to get a whole 1 asset into the drive they did back in june, just wondering what the usual cadence is for this offering.
I think they do it 1x/year, since if I recall correctly it is a 1 year 'free' license they offer.
324
« on: May 12, 2024, 14:04 »
A few other things:
a) Remove 'watermarks' (periodically midjourney puts those in). Watermarks = copyright protection measures = meaning content was created based off of stolen content. b) Look for artifacts, edit/crop/etc those (time consuming, i.e., 7 fingers, three legs, etc) c) "profit" - depends what you classify as "profit". It seems to be hit/miss - "sometimes" people do get "lucky" and have their portfolio take off - but from what I've seen - in general it seems they need 5,000+ assets ("ai images") to get "1000" downloads, and since a download can be as low as (I think it is $0.25), that means basically you'd "profit" with $250 for 5,000 assets. And - it can take 3-4 months before you get that "1000" download mark (aka $0.05/image), meaning - you are basically getting $50-$60/month for however long it takes you to create, keyword/describe, touchup/correct, upload, categorize, etc 5,000 images... assuming you did 100 images/hour (50 hours), $250/50 hours = means you basically make $5/hr... which - is probably why the majority of new "content creators" are coming from countries like east india, where "$5 USD" could/would be considered "good" money... if you processed LESS than 100 images/hr (more likely the case because of the worked involved) - it's more like $2-$3/hr...
So... Is $2-$3/hr a good rate for you?
325
« on: May 11, 2024, 23:52 »
.. b) If you somehow eliminated that situation (simple solution, don't approve east indian accounts, and disable existing ones post jan 2023 when the media made a co-rodinated annoucement to 'officially' bring public awareness to theft-based ai, even though it's already existed for years, side topic - most high level "media" (i.e., t.v. "news") is XXXX run, and most big "ai" companies (i.e., midjourney, chatGPT, etc) are XXX run -......
your anti-semitic libels are uncalled for (marked in red above), as are your continued slams against all 1+ billion East Indians
Lol - the comments aren't "anti-semetic" - (and you should actually look up the definition of what a "semite" is). The ownership is in factJewish, and it is a well known fact withinJewish circles - that that is one of the things you do for "business". Please don't be manipulated. Look @ the ownership of the companies, follow the money. It's also sad but simultaneously funny that you have become so "triggered" that uttering the word "jewish" makes you feel compelled to write red "xxxx"'s (understandable though as schooling is designed to program that response in people). As an aside, other "words" are designed to make people "triggered". I'm assuming you probably get triggered with hearing the word "covid" actually 'believing' it was real because of all the tell-a-vision programming you received the last 4 years? That was also a scam/con designed to simultaneously inject ppl w/poison while stealing their money via things like inflation (money printing), because they had been conned into believing they were sick while suffocating themselves and breathing in poisons from the masks? (Spoiler alert: the "sickness" was from poisons on the masks/tests/etc, as well as the co-ordinated pyschological operations on the general populace, i.e., things like isolation tactics, etc) - also designed to get people to 'believe' in it like a religion. Different topic though. With respect to east indians "in general" - it's also a fact - it isn't a "slam". Simply look @ the accounts that do fraud, and the names/locations of the account holders. Or join a few facebook groups/watch a few east indian videos on youtube where they promote the "latest business model" of simply "downloading complete portfolios and re-uploading them to make $$$". And if you read what I wrote - instead of having a knee-jerk programmed response - you would see I say its not "all" east indians - BUT - the majority of the "fake" accounts, whack-a-mole accounts, etc are indeed, created by east indians in east india. And again - not the "only" country - but one of the dominant ones. It would be quite simple really to "stop theft" in general (i.e., downloading complete portfolios from unlimited download sites then re-uploading) - just don't approve those accounts. It's also quite simple to do a couple programmatic checks to verify that isn't the case - but the blackrock/vanguard consoritorium of companies (also, incidentally jewish run, look up the ownership) - want to encourage that kind of behaviour to manipulate people into 'demanding' to be 'saved', via their 'solution', aka things like a 'digital id'/'id2020.org' (which is actually very very bad, and has a lot of nefarious purposes). Also a completely different topic, but accurate as well. As an aside - assuming you don't actually speak any other languages other than English, is that correct? Most other cultures have no issues calling a spade a spade, it's primarily western countries via the education system that have been "trained" through schooling to be "afraid" of stating the obvious, lest they be 'perceived' in a less than "authority approved" favourable light.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 47
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|