|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Wilm
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 35
351
« on: November 23, 2022, 02:06 »
Congratulations!
I can remember a beautiful day when I sold two photos for $125 each. But I did not have 140 yet.
352
« on: November 22, 2022, 08:35 »
Oops, sorry,
See I could download the old one, where - if you have a tax treaty - line 10 can be left blank
Yes, that's right.
353
« on: November 19, 2022, 04:57 »
still the most boring poster on this forum. no one cares what you have to say mate. give it up,
This statement is wrong for me personally. I am interested in what Pete has to say. Your rude comment, on the other hand, I'm sorry to read. Too bad!
354
« on: November 18, 2022, 15:41 »
Got a 3000$ sale yesterday, feels a bit over the top in terms of high sale, previous record was 600$ a couple of months back.
Any idea what kind of license is that?
editorial clip, not exclusive (the file is still live on site and on other sites as well and I was not asked to take it off).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hammer! Never read about an amount like this before!
355
« on: November 15, 2022, 17:02 »
42,500th... beat that!
Well, I'm sure the ranking refers to the downloads. For contributors of videos, the ranking should have no meaning.
356
« on: November 15, 2022, 16:00 »
September was my WME. The downloads were normal, the RPD was abysmal!
But Last month was even worse. October was normal again in terms of downloads. But the RPD has dropped again. Now October is my WME.
358
« on: November 13, 2022, 04:03 »
I am around 200th for the week with around 1000dls (don't want to be more specific or discuss portfolio size)
1,000 per week is fantastic! Congrats!
359
« on: November 13, 2022, 02:58 »
How do I get to see my weekly ranking? I've changed the stats to weekly and monthly downloads but no ranking appears. Am I missing something?
Go to dashboard - in left top corner you will see Time Frame dropdown menu - change to "This week".
Thanks. I am 1810th this week with 209 downloads which is reasonable for my portfolio size. Clearly there are still many artists making good downloads and money at Adobe.
Good Numbers!
May I ask how big your portfolio is?
5562
These are then very respectable figures in relation to the portfolio size!
360
« on: November 12, 2022, 12:21 »
How do I get to see my weekly ranking? I've changed the stats to weekly and monthly downloads but no ranking appears. Am I missing something?
Go to dashboard - in left top corner you will see Time Frame dropdown menu - change to "This week".
Thanks. I am 1810th this week with 209 downloads which is reasonable for my portfolio size. Clearly there are still many artists making good downloads and money at Adobe.
Good Numbers! May I ask how big your portfolio is?
361
« on: November 12, 2022, 11:58 »
Annie, I echo what Pacesetter said: Nice to hear from you again!
I wish your husband and you all the best and especially a speedy recovery.
Greetings to you down under!
362
« on: November 11, 2022, 17:55 »
At 7 dls for the week today and weekly rank has gone down to 30,600 which makes sense because average #dls/day has gone down.
Must be a wonderful feeling to make 100K downloads - and 1,500 in one day - I'm blown away!
1,500 in one week, not in one day.
I Mistyped : 1500 in a week is amazing! Congrats!
How many images do you have in total?
You asked the wrong person that question. I can only dream of 1,500 downloads a week. And I don't even have the imagination for that! The question should be addressed to HalfFull.
363
« on: November 11, 2022, 13:32 »
Anyone know how long the review turnaround is these days at 123RF? I uploaded over 2 weeks ago and still nothing.
Usually they need months! But in the Last weeks they were very quick. A few days.
364
« on: November 11, 2022, 08:46 »
For the week of Nov 7, I have 6 dls and a weekly rank of 28,200th, which is a higher # (and therefore further down) than @justanotherphotographer who's had 4 sales and is ranked ~20,000th for the week (or did you include your lifetime rank instead?) but ahead of the person with 3 video dls and $68+ earnings, ranked 30,000+ meanwhile I have very low average earnings, only $4.23 for the past three days.
I confirmed these are sales from Monday-Wed, 11/7-11/9.
Will check in at the end of the week.
If there are really 465,000 contributors or even 200,000, this puts me in the top 5 or 10% for # of dls which means the average microstocker must be earning even less than I imagined, since I've always considered myself small fry (729 images, rejoined when Adobe bought Fotolia). I guess most contributors upload a few files and don't do anything else. I think at one time ss said that 80% of contributors never licensed a single image.
Busy with so many other things I haven't grown my portfolio this year, though I did upload some png files and plan to upload more.
The adjustment of the weekly ranking always takes place with a time delay of one day. On Sunday, you see the weekly ranking, which is based on the numbers of the week up to and including Saturday. Since many contributors have no or only a few downloads on a Sunday, the weekly ranking on Sunday is the most realistic.
9 downloads yesterday, my weekly rank didn't change today. I always though it was earnings not downloads. Does anyone know?
Two questions, Diana:
- Have 24 hours passed?
- Do you have a very comparable number of downloads today?
My weekly ranking changes every day.
I am very sure that the ranking refers to downloads and not to revenue. This would also fit with the analysis made by Robert, which is exclusively about downloads.
Moreover, the old Fotolia ranking also referred exclusively to downloads and this was initially continued at AS..
Over 24 hours, what time does the update change? More downloads today, rank is downloads.
I don't know at what time the figures for the weekly ranking are adjusted, Diana. Has your weekly ranking changed now?
365
« on: November 11, 2022, 03:47 »
Lol... yeah a week not a day. 1500 in a day wow... I'd hear champaign corks popping I'm sure  I Bet there are a few that do though!
Yeah! Yuri sold 11,000 images per day. Go figure!!! Incredible!
366
« on: November 11, 2022, 02:18 »
At 7 dls for the week today and weekly rank has gone down to 30,600 which makes sense because average #dls/day has gone down.
Must be a wonderful feeling to make 100K downloads - and 1,500 in one day - I'm blown away!
1,500 in one week, not in one day.
367
« on: November 10, 2022, 16:50 »
In 2019 there were nearly 465.000 AS contributors - based on a research of Robert Kneschke. I could post a link to this research but I don't know if I'm allowed to do so.
I don't know how many contributors there are now. And I don't know how many there are active.
Some rough current data:
Roughly 20,000 contributors have about 10 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 7,000 contributors have about 50 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 5,000 contributors have about 75 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 3,000 contributors have more than 100 downloads per week.
Of course, the numbers fluctuate between better and worse weeks, e.g. because of holidays or after Christmas at the end of the year.
Interesting stats, cheers!
In Robert Kneschke's analysis from 2019, it can be seen that only 261 contributors had reached the sapphire ranking (more than 100,000) at that time.
If the overall ranking is based on the download numbers, you would have had at least the overall ranking of 261 with more than 100,000 downloads at that time. You are now at 564, which would mean that the number of Saphir contributors has more than doubled since 2019.
A few numbers from February 2019:
Total downloads/position in the overall ranking
4.700 / 8.000
8.500 / 5.000
28.000 / 1.400
32.000 / 1.200
67.000 / 450
120.000 / 200
The figures also agree quite well with Robert's analysis.
Early 2019:
Weekly downloads/position in the weekly ranking
10 / 10.000
50 / 3.000
100 / 1.000
250 / 350
350 / 200
400 / 170
500 / 140
Well, the doubling of sapphire contributors wouldn't surprise me, but I'd say its a lot more. This year there's been a big improvement in volume... Those weekly downloads / rank are way off now. The weeks I've hit 1.5k dls in a week my rank was 120. Just wished I was at that volume all the time
For a weekly ranking of 120, about 550 Dls per week was enough in 2019. 1,500 per week is brilliant! And beyond my imagination!
368
« on: November 10, 2022, 16:46 »
In 2019 there were nearly 465.000 AS contributors - based on a research of Robert Kneschke. I could post a link to this research but I don't know if I'm allowed to do so.
I don't know how many contributors there are now. And I don't know how many there are active.
Some rough current data:
Roughly 20,000 contributors have about 10 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 7,000 contributors have about 50 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 5,000 contributors have about 75 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 3,000 contributors have more than 100 downloads per week.
Of course, the numbers fluctuate between better and worse weeks, e.g. because of holidays or after Christmas at the end of the year.
Interesting stats, cheers!
In Robert Kneschke's analysis from 2019, it can be seen that only 261 contributors had reached the sapphire ranking (more than 100,000) at that time.
If the overall ranking is based on the download numbers, you would have had at least the overall ranking of 261 with more than 100,000 downloads at that time. You are now at 564, which would mean that the number of Saphir contributors has more than doubled since 2019.
A few numbers from February 2019:
Total downloads/position in the overall ranking
4.700 / 8.000
8.500 / 5.000
28.000 / 1.400
32.000 / 1.200
67.000 / 450
120.000 / 200
The figures also agree quite well with Robert's analysis.
Early 2019:
Weekly downloads/position in the weekly ranking
10 / 10.000
50 / 3.000
100 / 1.000
250 / 350
350 / 200
400 / 170
500 / 140
Well, the doubling of sapphire contributors wouldn't surprise me, but I'd say its a lot more. This year there's been a big improvement in volume... Those weekly downloads / rank are way off now. The weeks I've hit 1.5k dls in a week my rank was 120. Just wished I was at that volume all the time
Well, at least you know one fact: you know that (only) 563 contributors have sold more images than you. Sapphire is defined as having more than 100,000 downloads. Since I don't know how many downloads you have exactly, I can't judge how many Sapphire contributors there are. I guess around 600 to 800, but you can judge that better than I can. Because I move in the Emerald area.
369
« on: November 10, 2022, 08:40 »
For the week of Nov 7, I have 6 dls and a weekly rank of 28,200th, which is a higher # (and therefore further down) than @justanotherphotographer who's had 4 sales and is ranked ~20,000th for the week (or did you include your lifetime rank instead?) but ahead of the person with 3 video dls and $68+ earnings, ranked 30,000+ meanwhile I have very low average earnings, only $4.23 for the past three days.
I confirmed these are sales from Monday-Wed, 11/7-11/9.
Will check in at the end of the week.
If there are really 465,000 contributors or even 200,000, this puts me in the top 5 or 10% for # of dls which means the average microstocker must be earning even less than I imagined, since I've always considered myself small fry (729 images, rejoined when Adobe bought Fotolia). I guess most contributors upload a few files and don't do anything else. I think at one time ss said that 80% of contributors never licensed a single image.
Busy with so many other things I haven't grown my portfolio this year, though I did upload some png files and plan to upload more.
The adjustment of the weekly ranking always takes place with a time delay of one day. On Sunday, you see the weekly ranking, which is based on the numbers of the week up to and including Saturday. Since many contributors have no or only a few downloads on a Sunday, the weekly ranking on Sunday is the most realistic.
9 downloads yesterday, my weekly rank didn't change today. I always though it was earnings not downloads. Does anyone know?
Two questions, Diana: - Have 24 hours passed? - Do you have a very comparable number of downloads today? My weekly ranking changes every day. I am very sure that the ranking refers to downloads and not to revenue. This would also fit with the analysis made by Robert, which is exclusively about downloads. Moreover, the old Fotolia ranking also referred exclusively to downloads and this was initially continued at AS..
370
« on: November 10, 2022, 06:30 »
In 2019 there were nearly 465.000 AS contributors - based on a research of Robert Kneschke. I could post a link to this research but I don't know if I'm allowed to do so.
I don't know how many contributors there are now. And I don't know how many there are active.
Some rough current data:
Roughly 20,000 contributors have about 10 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 7,000 contributors have about 50 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 5,000 contributors have about 75 or more downloads per week.
Roughly 3,000 contributors have more than 100 downloads per week.
Of course, the numbers fluctuate between better and worse weeks, e.g. because of holidays or after Christmas at the end of the year.
Interesting stats, cheers!
In Robert Kneschke's analysis from 2019, it can be seen that only 261 contributors had reached the sapphire ranking (more than 100,000) at that time. If the overall ranking is based on the download numbers, you would have had at least the overall ranking of 261 with more than 100,000 downloads at that time. You are now at 564, which would mean that the number of Saphir contributors has more than doubled since 2019. A few numbers from February 2019: Total downloads/position in the overall ranking 4.700 / 8.000 8.500 / 5.000 28.000 / 1.400 32.000 / 1.200 67.000 / 450 120.000 / 200 The figures also agree quite well with Robert's analysis. Early 2019: Weekly downloads/position in the weekly ranking 10 / 10.000 50 / 3.000 100 / 1.000 250 / 350 350 / 200 400 / 170 500 / 140
371
« on: November 10, 2022, 05:29 »
For the week of Nov 7, I have 6 dls and a weekly rank of 28,200th, which is a higher # (and therefore further down) than @justanotherphotographer who's had 4 sales and is ranked ~20,000th for the week (or did you include your lifetime rank instead?) but ahead of the person with 3 video dls and $68+ earnings, ranked 30,000+ meanwhile I have very low average earnings, only $4.23 for the past three days.
I confirmed these are sales from Monday-Wed, 11/7-11/9.
Will check in at the end of the week.
If there are really 465,000 contributors or even 200,000, this puts me in the top 5 or 10% for # of dls which means the average microstocker must be earning even less than I imagined, since I've always considered myself small fry (729 images, rejoined when Adobe bought Fotolia). I guess most contributors upload a few files and don't do anything else. I think at one time ss said that 80% of contributors never licensed a single image.
Busy with so many other things I haven't grown my portfolio this year, though I did upload some png files and plan to upload more.
The adjustment of the weekly ranking always takes place with a time delay of one day. On Sunday, you see the weekly ranking, which is based on the numbers of the week up to and including Saturday. Since many contributors have no or only a few downloads on a Sunday, the weekly ranking on Sunday is the most realistic.
372
« on: November 10, 2022, 05:23 »
It worked for me. All my files can now only be downloaded as a premium licence. No more PLUS images.
I also exceeded the 10,000 downloads on 123rf today.
That's modest, but still contributes a percentage to my total sales. And that is more downloads than I have e.g. on dreamstime.
But never before have the revenues been worse than in 2022 on 123rf. It's getting less and less every year because the RPD and the downloads are going down the drain.
373
« on: November 10, 2022, 02:10 »
Whoah.... I mean WHOAH!!!
Congrats on that one! Great!
374
« on: November 09, 2022, 17:19 »
And, to help me understand the statistics, I'm assuming you've reached over 100,000 downloads on Adobe. Is that correct?
375
« on: November 09, 2022, 17:17 »
Would you be so kind as to post your weekly ranking again on Sunday evening when the week is over?
Do we know that the week is the last 7 days or the last calendar week? The graphs look that way, but do we know? Nov. 7th is the week, which is a Monday? 
16,750th and the week hasn't been anything special. If I get some more DLs I'll try to remember to check again.
25,100th lifetime - keep in mind I only rejoined when Adobe bought them, I don't have many images and no video.
I don't pay attention to rank. Personally it means nothing.
I think its a rolling 7 days but not 100% confident on that. Lifetime 564, week - down a bit at 400 but varies between 119 - 800 depending on the time of year.
I find the weekly rank accurately reflects the amount of of dls ect where as the lifetime rank seems to relate / respond to earnings more.
What makes you think that the overall ranking could be based on revenue rather than downloads? I've never asked myself that question, because I've always assumed that the weekly ranking and the overall ranking always refer to downloads. There I am already a little curious. Whereby I must admit that alijaber is of course also right with his contribution to the topic of videos.
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 35
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
