351
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 351
Dreamstime.com / Re: Anyone else get dense responses from support?« on: October 09, 2016, 11:44 »352
Dreamstime.com / Re: Anyone else get dense responses from support?« on: October 09, 2016, 11:42 »Seems clear enough to me with their current sales records they ought to change it....... Yeah, at this rate, I'll have to wait at least another six months before I get paid. 353
Dreamstime.com / Anyone else get dense responses from support?« on: October 05, 2016, 18:22 »
I sent a message to Dreamstime support:
"From discussion in the forums, I understand that it is possible to change the minimum payout to something as low as $40. I would like to change my minimum payout (it is currently at $100, and I can't wait that long between payments) but can not figure out how to do that." I did get a prompt response, which is better than most sites. However, it was this: "There must be at least $100 USD in the earnings for the payment system to accept a payment request through your account" *sigh* I knew that. I said I knew that. I want to CHANGE that. Does anyone here know how to do that? 354
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime Revealing Contributors' Real Names and Location on the Website« on: September 23, 2016, 08:47 »
I would like to have my business contact information widely available. It's my business, after all.
355
PhotoDune / Re: Photodune Stats?« on: September 02, 2016, 10:37 »
I found uploading to Envato to be so difficult, and poorly explained, that it bordered on traumatic.
356
Envato / Re: Envato in top 4... worth the hassle yet?« on: August 31, 2016, 17:22 »
You're probably right. I gave Alamy another chance when they moved up the chart, but have not sold anything there.
Y'know what really hurt my feelings? Envato's rejection letter came with a link to "helpful articles". These articles were all "how to draw" tutorials. I've got a fuggin degree in drawing. I know how to do THAT. It's the guessing what Envato wants I'm having trouble with. I'm going to give up on Envato then. It's so frustrating to think there could be sales over there, if only I could figure out how to get to them. But, like you say, it's probably just a dirty trick. 357
Envato / Envato in top 4... worth the hassle yet?« on: August 31, 2016, 16:58 »
I have been struggling through the maze of Envato's sites, trying to figure out how to upload and submit something. I finally got a vector submitted to Graphic River (I think) and it was rejected for "quality" with no clue as to whether they meant quality of the image, or quality of the file. And, of course, I can't figure out how to ask for clarification.
Can anyone tell me WHAT is selling there that is making such a good earnings rating? Is it worth the struggle to navigate their site*, and make all the little jpgs, to submit to Graphic River? Or are the earnings coming from templates, or videos, or audio, or something else I don't have to submit? Envato is making me cry, literally. *I gave up hope of finding my way back to a particular page, and just started bookmarking important pages as I found them. Envato has its own folder in my bookmark folder. 358
Shutterstock.com / Re: Map is broken?« on: August 25, 2016, 09:16 »
I don't understand why everyone is upset about that map.
It's fun, but not really useful. I would be fine with the map vanishing altogether, if everything else was fixed. Heck, just fix half of everything else. 359
Newbie Discussion / Re: new here ~ just trying to figure out microstock« on: August 20, 2016, 08:00 »Hi guys! I'm a newbie. Seems like I registered to a good forum. Looking forward to learning new things here. Run away! Save yourself! It's too late for the rest of us, but YOU may be able to save your sanity. 360
Off Topic / Re: Collecting Rainwater Now Illegal in Many States as Big Government Claims Ownersh« on: August 20, 2016, 07:57 »
Well, there is that. Chemtrails and all...
361
Off Topic / Re: Collecting Rainwater Now Illegal in Many States as Big Government Claims Ownersh« on: August 19, 2016, 19:03 »
Here in the desert, it IS a big deal. If someone puts dams on their property to stop rainwater, it can seriously affect farms downstream.
Sure, nobody is going to complain about a couple of rain barrels, but this guy was putting up ten foot dams. He wasn't just catching the rain on his property, he was catching the rain running down from uphill areas. When the annual rainfall is about 14 inches that can make the difference between life and death. Especially since the rain comes in chunks. If you don't get the water you expected from the big rainstorm in July, you may not get more until October. That water flowing down from higher up is very important. 362
Shutterstock.com / Re: SSTK stock hits new high« on: August 16, 2016, 09:31 »
i'm thrilled.
![]() They've fartled around and made the stock jump. whoopee. Typical corporate mistaking image for substance. A stock jump won't last unless the company actually does something for it. If Shutterstock doesn't get their machine working properly, the stock will go back down. Sure, it can be fluffed up again by more finagling, but only for so long. It's not a perpetual motion machine. If you keep jiggling it to get better figures, it will eventually break. 363
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Well, I'm out.« on: August 04, 2016, 08:40 »
Well, I don't think I'll wait for the amount they owe me to get higher... but still not get paid. After all, if I'll give a panhandler a few dollars, I suppose I can let CanStock have a few. I wouldn't want the owner to freeze to death over the winter.
364
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Well, I'm out.« on: August 03, 2016, 19:14 »
Response from CanStock:
Quote Thank you for contacting us. It's only $9, and they're being shirty about it? Things must really be bad. 365
CanStockPhoto.com / Well, I'm out.« on: August 03, 2016, 10:30 »
I will generally stick with a site through periods of low or even no sales, because it's not really any effort to wait. Eventually, most sites will get their act together, and sales will pick up again.
So, I have been uploading new work to CanStock along with my other sites. Suddenly, I'm getting rejections for inappropriate keywords, and no satisfactory response from support about why. I am not going expend energy on a dying site to get things accepted without the keywords they need to sell. If I can't label an image about "bad attitude" with "bad attitude", what's the point? That moves the possibility of sale from "unlikely" to "impossible". It's sad, I have always liked CanStock for some reason. 366
Shutterstock.com / Re: Someone at Shutterstock thinks dinosaurs are real.« on: July 12, 2016, 10:04 »
That time machine was a great investment toward my stock career.
367
Shutterstock.com / Someone at Shutterstock thinks dinosaurs are real.« on: July 11, 2016, 22:33 »![]() ![]() No property release, not editorial, just up there like wildlife photos. ha ha hahahahahahahahaha Meanwhile, this door was rejected for intellectual property. ![]() 368
Shutterstock.com / Re: YARPT (Yet Another Review Problem Thread)« on: June 17, 2016, 17:42 »
Approved. I thought so.
369
Image Sleuth / Re: The worst site I've seen in a long time« on: June 17, 2016, 14:33 »
Heck, for all we know, it's money laundering.
370
Shutterstock.com / Re: YARPT (Yet Another Review Problem Thread)« on: June 17, 2016, 14:07 »
I think what bugs me most about the request for reference images is that we're artists.
It's easy to create a "reference image" from the vector illustration itself. What does it accomplish? If something seems to be traced from a photo, sure, ask for the photo for reference. But this? From a photo? ![]() (This one has been accepted on Shutterstock) 371
Shutterstock.com / YARPT (Yet Another Review Problem Thread)« on: June 17, 2016, 14:02 »
Aargh! I've been uploading a new set of vectors all week, all accepted...
today, all rejected Edges--Paths are sloppy and/or poorly constructed. Reference Image -- A reference image is required for this image. All of them. I'm uploading hundreds of vectors. Shutterstock ain't getting a reference image with each and every one. I get so frustrated with them sometimes, I think of dropping them even if they ARE my best seller. *grump* I'm going to resubmit them without changes. 372
Shutterstock.com / Re: Am i going good?« on: March 27, 2016, 09:08 »
I think you need to start your own thread, and include some samples of your work.
373
Shutterstock.com / Re: Alamy #2??« on: March 13, 2016, 13:13 »
I gave up on Alamy, because they never sold anything, wouldn't defend my copyright, and couldn't get my stuff listed correctly (they kept offering it as RM instead of RF)
If this continues, I may have to go back to them. Maybe they had a coup. 374
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock expands headquarters while contracting our earnings« on: February 24, 2016, 12:55 »They may be greedy grasping etc but I really don't think Shutterstock is clueless.....I think what tends to be overlooked is the marketing element you can have the best content in the world but if no one knows you've got it its worthless and I suspect if customers of SS start telling them they haven't got the right content they would act Only if it would make the stock jump. 375
Shutterstock.com / Re: Upgrades to Shutterstock email notice« on: February 22, 2016, 18:15 »
This should be interesting...
|
|