|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - trabuco
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17
351
« on: April 13, 2019, 07:46 »
No categories to me either.
Easier to upload.
352
« on: April 13, 2019, 04:22 »
Hola, es una duda que yo tambin tengo.
Supongo que depender del algoritmo de bsqueda de cada agencia. Por ejemplo Dreamstime no da la opcin de poner palabras complejas y en Istock cuando pones palabras complejas generalmente aparecen resaltadas en rojo sin poder ofrecerte otra opcin similar.
Poco ms puedo aportar y espero que alguien pueda indicarnos con ms precisin. Saludos
Curioseando en imgenes de otros portafolios he visto que la gente las usa para hacer algo parecido al spam, por ejemplo en fotos de la Torre Eiffel he visto meter todas las expresiones imaginables con "torre", pero no s si eso vale de algo, no lo creo.
353
« on: April 13, 2019, 01:59 »
Hola:
Os voy a preguntar algo en Espaol porque en ingls me va a ser complicado hacerme entender.
Mi pregunta es si creis que es prctico usar palabras clave complejas en lugar de una sola palabra, es decir "Eiffel Tower" en lugar de "eiffel,tower"
o "Santiago de Compostela" en lugar de "santiago,compostela".
Lo pregunto porque empec metiendo palabras individuales pero cada vez uso ms las palabras complejas y tengo la sensacin de que acabo haciendo una especie de autospam. Adems supongo que cuantas ms metes menos relevantes son, as que no s si es realmente prctico. Es decir, si haces esto con varias de las palabras y usas 50 al final te salen muchas ms y las importantes pierden relevancia, entiendo.
Otra pregunta: duplicis las palabras en otros idiomas? Por ejemplo "tour" y "torre" o "place" y "square"?
Nunca s cmo etiquetar bien en esos casos. No veo diferencias de ventas entre unas imgenes y otras adems usando una forma u otra.
Yo me inclino por usar 50 palabras individuales, sin complicarlas ni multiplicarlas, pero no s si esto es un error. Me resulta mucho ms cmodo y voy mucho ms al grano, a las relevantes.
Gracias por vuestras opiniones.
354
« on: April 04, 2019, 10:12 »
De momento como hobby. Pero cada vez le estoy echando ms horas.
355
« on: April 04, 2019, 03:38 »
Es cierto, pero es una manera de acostumbrarnos a usar el ingles los que no lo utilizamos mucho. Yo solo lo uso para el microstock o cuando voy a UK 
356
« on: April 03, 2019, 15:49 »
Esto estuvo siempre aqu? Acabo de verlo   En fin, los hispanohablantes somos los mejores. Un saludo.
357
« on: April 03, 2019, 15:47 »
The only one that works properly for me is SS. Slowly, but soon yet.
Not a good future for this business.
358
« on: April 03, 2019, 14:32 »
Thanks for the answers.
I understood this for the titles and objects logos, but the confussion was for AS. Anyway the better option is not to include these keywords.
When I shot my guitars I use to focus cutting the part with logos and using my hands to cover them if are on pickguard f.i.
All of these pictures are accepted as creative, except on BS, where all of them are rejected and submitted as editorial.
359
« on: April 03, 2019, 06:52 »
"PRS"?
Well, I've read on SS that I can't use them. No matches found searching by "Gibson Les Paul".
In AS searched by "Gibson Les Paul" and there are pictures.
So... I think I'm not going to include them, gonna use "mahogany" o thinks like that instead the brand.
Would be better the same criteria.
360
« on: April 03, 2019, 04:12 »
Hi:
Do you know if brands can be used as keywords in creative content? f.i. "les paul" and "gibson" in a les paul type guitar without logos?
Thank you.
361
« on: March 24, 2019, 11:18 »
I deleted my port and quit with my first sale, 0.05 USD. My pictures are not master pieces, but are not for free.
I was thinking about coming back and how to do it (small port, similar pictures with same keywording...) but I think Getty is not for me.
362
« on: March 24, 2019, 07:02 »
If they have cash enough.
363
« on: March 22, 2019, 04:52 »
The key is whether the revisors like the picture or not, I think. I have submitted pictures with people and OK to them while in the rest of agencies submitted them as editorial.
364
« on: March 21, 2019, 16:19 »
Re-submit it.
365
« on: March 19, 2019, 11:00 »
This is bizarre: One major reason for the decline is that before selling it to Carlyle four years later, the buyer saddled it with additional debt, some of which was used to finance dividends.
366
« on: March 19, 2019, 05:57 »
Well I don't think the company is going to disappear. In case of crash another one would buy it and keep it working. Anyway, for the content of the article, this year we are going to know it.
368
« on: March 14, 2019, 08:35 »
It's not a problem with my system. It's the web.
369
« on: March 14, 2019, 07:44 »
I use to paste words from a text file after deleting and deactivating automatic generated keywords.
I'm using Linux (Ubuntu) and LibreOffice Writer, an .odt text file.
Chrome Browser.
Everything uses to work fine.
Well, gonna return to my private party.
370
« on: March 14, 2019, 07:28 »
As far as I can see:
a) ALL the multiple batches are wrong.
b) Most of single batches are ok. Some of them, very few I think, are wrong.
The mistakes are BIG, most of them wrong countries, wrong places and wrong buildings (church instead of a lighthouse or "factory" and "chimney" in Trafalgar Square for the Nelson's Column).
A great help the automatic generated words.
371
« on: March 14, 2019, 07:21 »
Well, I have this problem with some pictures sent one by one too.
I can't undertand what happened. Looks like a joke from the revision.
So, have to revise all my pictures on Adobe one by one. When they are changed, the number of keywords is much lower than I setted. So I click and check the number.
The support told me that sometimes there's a problem with the software to label (that I don't use) or a problem with their automatic keywords. So, doesn't know.
Looks like a problem with the automatic keywords, an stupid tool anyway.
372
« on: March 14, 2019, 02:54 »
Thanks.
I think I'm going to send them one by one in the future. I use to send 10 pictures batches.
373
« on: March 14, 2019, 02:04 »
I use to copy and paste text. It's some kind of bug with the multiple sendings. Going to revise this files now.
The single file sendings are ok.
374
« on: March 13, 2019, 09:33 »
Hi.
I have a problem with my uploads on Adobe. Some of the keywords disappear and are replaced by other words than have no relation with the picture.
Like "castle" "England" or "stockholm" for a view of Notre Dame and the Seine river. The last time it happened in a two pictures batch labeled and sent together. They got different keywords that I dindn't set, I mean, setted the same keywords fot the two pictures, but now they are different and have these words with no relation with mine.
Anyone has this problem too?
The order is different too, doesn't match with mine.
I can't reupload every single picture one by one when accepted so... I'm thinking to stop uploading or maybe quit and delete my 700 portfolio.
--> The problem happens when I set several pictures with the same title and keywords, churchs of Paris labeled as "Italy" or "tuscany" and things like that.
Well, dozens of pictures are wrong labeled. All the times that I have sent more than one single picture.
375
« on: March 11, 2019, 07:45 »
Ftp works fine to me.
What settings are you using? I use Filezilla withall the recommended settings from Bigstock and it never worked.
Default settings. I think I didn't change anything.
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
