pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tickstock

Pages: 1 ... 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 ... 151
3527
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 13, 2013, 06:30 »
Not sure how we all got confused.. check out the link that Luis posted.
Shutterstock's net income is not in the billions.  It is in the millions.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1549346/000104746912005905/a2209364zs-1.htm

The full amounts without any abbreviation are...

2009: $18,842,000         
2010: $18,938,000
2011: $21,864,000

Perhaps it's also confusing that some countries use commas, where others use a decimal.

Not confused, just giving Luis a bit of a hard time.  He took the numbers from the Shutterstock report where it said (in thousands) and changed it to ($ M).  I guess he also changed the meaning of the comma from the report he cited, maybe?

3528
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 12, 2013, 20:43 »
Depends where you live.
In some countries, a Billion is a thousand million and in others it is a billion billion.
The UK and US are on either side of that divide, IIRC
Apparently it could mean a million million or a thousand million.  Either way if Shutterstock is making $47,500 million, $47.5 thousand million or $47,500,000,000 they are better off than I knew.

3529
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 12, 2013, 20:38 »
SS (net income) ($ M)

- 2009 (18,842)
- 2010 (18,938)
- 2011 (21,864)
- 2012 (47,500)

(http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1549346/000104746912005905/a2209364zs-1.htm)
(http://finance.yahoo.com/news/shutterstock-reports-fourth-quarter-full-210500878.html)

Man I didn't realize Shutterstock's net income was 47 BILLLION dollars last year.  High fives all around!


those are commas my friend

($ M) means millions right?


not BI

Yeah 47,500 million.  Like you wrote.  That's the same as 47.5 BILLION. 

3530
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 12, 2013, 20:35 »
SS (net income) ($ M)

- 2009 (18,842)
- 2010 (18,938)
- 2011 (21,864)
- 2012 (47,500)

(http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1549346/000104746912005905/a2209364zs-1.htm)
(http://finance.yahoo.com/news/shutterstock-reports-fourth-quarter-full-210500878.html)

Man I didn't realize Shutterstock's net income was 47 BILLLION dollars last year.  High fives all around!


those are commas my friend

($ M) means millions right? 

3531
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 12, 2013, 20:31 »
SS (net income) ($ M)

- 2009 (18,842)
- 2010 (18,938)
- 2011 (21,864)
- 2012 (47,500)

(http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1549346/000104746912005905/a2209364zs-1.htm)
(http://finance.yahoo.com/news/shutterstock-reports-fourth-quarter-full-210500878.html)

Man I didn't realize Shutterstock's net income was 47 BILLLION dollars last year.  High fives all around!

3532
iStockPhoto.com / Re: No downloads in two working days!!!
« on: March 12, 2013, 20:27 »
.

3533
General Stock Discussion / Re: Arcurs Keywording
« on: March 12, 2013, 17:22 »
.

3534
iStockPhoto.com / Re: No downloads in two working days!!!
« on: March 12, 2013, 14:05 »
.

3535
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 12, 2013, 14:03 »
Then there's Stocksy. Previously Sean might have only have had a luke-warm and slightly sceptical interest in it, especially with the restrictions imposed by his exclusive status. Now Getty have freed him from such constraints he will be able to give Stocksy his 100% effort. Getty will find out that they were far better having Sean as their friend (and a handy revenue and ideas generator) than their competitor or as their competitors' asset.
I doubt Sean will have very many images at Stocksy unless they make an exception for him, they seem to be looking for artistic images not traditional stock images which Sean does so well.  Maybe he'll change it up a little now but my guess is he will continue to put most of efforts into creating the type of work that has made him so successful already.

3536
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 12, 2013, 11:42 »
Good luck Cobalt!
We have 3 more weeks to go.
Very excited as well!

You too? Could have sworn you were always telling us how fantastic exclusivity with Istock was.

Looks to me that the predicted mass-exodus from exclusivity is now well underway. I wonder if Istock will try and sweeten the terms or take any other action in an attempt to stem the flow?

The magic word here is "was".
I was exclusive as long as it made financial sense and always thought it's a good idea choosing to be exclusive or not based on numbers and not emotions.  The people running IS don't have much common sense IMO so numbers are going down.
I still think that for people that are making over 35% of their income from IS, exclusivity makes sense.
I personally think (or hope) I can make more as an indy.  Time will tell.

I can also tell you that I met with one of the big 4 agencies and they claimed that in recent weeks they have been contacted with dozens of exclusives looking to become indy.
Will you be posting your results?

3537
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Banned from Istock club
« on: March 11, 2013, 21:17 »
.

3538
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Banned from Istock club
« on: March 11, 2013, 19:33 »
.

3539
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Banned from Istock club
« on: March 11, 2013, 19:01 »
.

3540
.

3541
Newbie Discussion / Re: Exclusive Differences ?
« on: March 11, 2013, 17:45 »
.

3542
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 11, 2013, 14:41 »
@ticketstock

the other sites are not cozying up to Google and handing over files for 12 dollars to 425 million people.

The Getty/Google deal changed things quite dramatically and not just for me. I know the other stock agencies are no angels, but here in Germany Fotolia is the biggest and best known site by far and I know a lot of people who sell really well there. Since I live here, can shoot local content and Fotolia allows me to keyword in german, i hope to take advantage of that.

And all the other agencies are TALKING to me. I have now been trying for over a month to communicate directly with gettyimages about my house contract and I simply cannot get a reply even to easy questions. And what Getty does, soon will be done on istock. They have already killed the telephone support and many contributors report being stuck in an endless loop between forums and the ticket system. Again, I know this can happen on other sites as well, but if you are exclusive,  communication problems are just beyond frustrating.

I had no intention of going independent when the year started, I could have easily been happy between video independence and photo exclusivity.

But with all that happened...I might as well be independent and have more control over my work. All the drama on istock is so distracting, I really want to focus on production.

@Sue just a silly marketing thing about how the bad best match match was like a bad experience with an online dating site and then they sent out a bonus code...forget it, it was silly. But we have seen things like these several times.

Anyway, thanks for the kind wishes, also on my website. It will be a long journey, but so many people are going independent, I wont be climbing up that mountain alone.
As long as you are going into it with eyes open then you're probably making the right decision.  From what I hear Fotolia is pretty good for German contributors, as long as you have local content.  Dreamstime and Fotolia should also be good about keeping all the distractions to a minimum since nothing negative can be posted on their forums.  Again good luck, I'll be following how it's going for you.

3545
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 11, 2013, 14:03 »
The usual - Shutterstock, Fotolia, dreamstime, pond5 and maybe later some of the smaller ones. I am also on clipdealer and clipcanvas with my videos, so Ill probably upload photos there as well (if they take photos).

I am not in a hurry. I know it will take two years to recover my income and my main focus for the year will be video, the way I planned it at the beginning of the year.

I would also like to try selling from my own site, but that is probably a project for 2014.

You can follow my journey to independence on my facebook page, if you are interested: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cobaltstockcom/169793413171571
You see those companies as "genuinely trying to build a longterm business."?  I wouldn't categorize Fotolia that way at all or Dreamstime, they both have done similar things to what Istock has done.  Dreamstime with their levels and lowering royalty rates and Fotolia changing the goal posts and some people here claim they punish higher royalty earners in the search.  I'd like to see Pond5 do well but without rejecting anything or fixing their terrible keyword spam problem I don't have much confidence in them in the long term.

3546
iStockPhoto.com / Re: sjlocke was just booted from iStock
« on: March 11, 2013, 13:52 »
So glad I can move on and work with companies that are maybe a lot smaller but genuinely trying to build a longterm business. It will be more work but I already feel safer knowing I will never again be dependent on one companies managers (that I have no influence in choosing).
Good luck, which companies are you going to contribute to?

3547
Newbie Discussion / Re: Rejected Application to Istock Help!
« on: March 11, 2013, 13:35 »
.

3548
Newbie Discussion / Re: Rejected Application to Istock Help!
« on: March 11, 2013, 13:08 »
.

3549
Newbie Discussion / Re: Rejected Application to Istock Help!
« on: March 11, 2013, 12:59 »
.

3550
Newbie Discussion / Re: Rejected Application to Istock Help!
« on: March 11, 2013, 12:54 »
.

Pages: 1 ... 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 ... 151

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors