401
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Rejections increasing?
« on: December 16, 2008, 15:09 »
I've seen fewer rejections the last few weeks. Figured it was just a phase or maybe they like what I'm uploading a little more than usual.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 401
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Rejections increasing?« on: December 16, 2008, 15:09 »
I've seen fewer rejections the last few weeks. Figured it was just a phase or maybe they like what I'm uploading a little more than usual.
402
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Best Match 2.0« on: December 16, 2008, 14:41 »
Hey! I just looked at my portfolio using best match and my best seller which was sitting in the dead last position for weeks has now moved up 17 slots. Woo hoo!
![]() One day later and the bestseller image has moved up 62 slots from the last position. Definitely a shift going on. Yay! 403
StockXpert.com / Re: Opting in at Stockxpert?« on: December 15, 2008, 16:37 »
I'm getting a good mixture of Jupiter, Photos.com and StockXpert subscription and regular sales.
404
Dreamstime.com / Re: Advise on DT Please beefore I upload to them.« on: December 15, 2008, 13:56 »
They will sometimes take flowers and landscapes but they must be of exceptional quality or unusual subject matter.
405
Off Topic / Re: becareful wink is a trademark now ;-)« on: December 15, 2008, 07:58 »
Not the sharpest pin in the cushion, is he?
![]() 406
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia sales? how have yours been lately?« on: December 12, 2008, 06:30 »
My views and sales were also way down starting in the middle of last month. This month FT is dead last of my 7 microstock agencies. Not sure what they changed and hope things improve.
407
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Can't Log on to Istock« on: December 10, 2008, 10:22 »
I was not able to log in from my iPhone (internet down at work) but have the login info saved at home on Safari, so OK there.
408
StockXpert.com / Re: Comment & View the Image Above Yours! [Helps Search Rank]« on: December 09, 2008, 07:32 »409
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Cautious Optimism« on: December 08, 2008, 19:33 »
Yes! I am cautiously optimistic. Already close to passing November's total sales. I noticed the increase starting Dec. 1. Did have a slow few days over the last weekend and now it has picked up again. My old best sellers are still buried but there seems to be a "2nd tier" of new best sellers emerging from some of my older files (less than a year old). Also, more views on newly uploaded files. I never stopped uploading during the slowdown and continue to fulfill my weekly allotment.
410
123RF / Re: Do you make $100/month at 123RF?« on: December 08, 2008, 18:51 »
Already have a BME this month on 123RF (which is not sayin' much) but doing good compared to StockXpert and FT which are dead in the water. They all seem to take turns doing well one month and bad the next (for me) and it would be wonderful if they were all consistent and did well every month
![]() 411
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock's Holiday Schedule and New Payout Policy« on: December 04, 2008, 10:48 »Quote another awesome point is that uploads no longer read iptc data for me at least Same here. Seems to be an intermittent problem. 412
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock sales (+) (-) (=) -Poll-« on: December 01, 2008, 15:12 »
I never had much of chance to do well at IS (only a few good months) and I'm sure there are many other new contributors, independent and exclusive, who feel as disappointed as me about what has happened with the best match changes. Devastating
![]() 413
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock sales (+) (-) (=) -Poll-« on: November 29, 2008, 17:34 »Quote Yep, we are done here folks. Clearly there are differing opinions on what Exclusivity/Non-exclusivity means to a contributor bottom line. For all the perks we provide our Exclusives we appreciate that some would feel we are trying to push out non-exclusives. The reality is we are trying to provide more incentive to the people on the fence. How does decimating a person's search position and sales help one decide to go exclusive if you are on the fence? ![]() Maybe if IS was the only site you were uploading to, you would go exclusive out of sheer desperation but if you upload to other sites and can compare your progress, you can clearly see the mind games going on there. Personally, I am extremely disappointed in the tactics being used by IS. Waaaaay to extreme to the point where I don't trust them anymore. 414
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia sales? how have yours been lately?« on: November 26, 2008, 07:00 »
Sales have been inconsistent throughout the month with 3 ELs at the first part of the month and a slowdown at the end of the month but still will end up with BME. Very low acceptance rate and less than 200 photos there. Overall, sales have been improving almost every month.
415
StockXpert.com / Re: Overall, is it worth it on Photos.com?« on: November 23, 2008, 14:05 »
Things are really starting to kick in for me. With the addition of the Jupiter and Photos.com sales along with regular StockXpert sales, my income has tripled this month on StockXpert with a BME by far. Very pleased with this progress
![]() 416
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Five days without a sale« on: November 22, 2008, 05:54 »
This devastating drop in sales gives me a sick feeling in my stomach.
![]() 417
iStockPhoto.com / Re: How's Your Month Shaping Up?« on: November 20, 2008, 17:25 »
Here's my analogy for IS. It's like i meet this wonderful guy who heaps lots of love and attention on me and then just when I'm starting to fall hard for him and ready to make a commitment, I find out he is already married to someone else.
![]() 418
General Stock Discussion / Re: who bought your images? can you find out?« on: November 19, 2008, 13:36 »
I think there are unwritten aesthetic rules that run throughout the collective unconscious of international clients who buy our photos. There are certain images that do well on every site and I think it is because they fill a need for a lot of people or they are very eye catching and well done and people are compelled to buy them. So it really isn't the same person buying your photos, it is many different people buying your work because it is just what they are looking for.
![]() 419
StockXpert.com / Re: Categories when uploading to StockXpert« on: November 15, 2008, 16:18 »i have never added catagories to any of my images!? ... maybe i should have.... You still can ![]() 420
StockXpert.com / Re: Categories when uploading to StockXpert« on: November 15, 2008, 14:59 »
Been with StockXpert for about 6 months now. I always add 1 or 2 categories to every photo and this is the 1st month where I'm getting sales almost every day. Is there really any way to know if choosing categories helps or not?
421
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Isolated objects on IS, with shadow or without it?« on: November 15, 2008, 07:14 »
When you click on the clipping path and make it a selection in Photoshop, you get a very clean copy to paste into other applications with no stray pixels to worry about. Also, a clipping path allows you to place a jpeg into a page layout program such as InDesign with a transparent background. Similar to a .psd or .png file. I don't know much about how the clipping paths work with Windows applications, if at all.
I have sometimes gone 3 or 4 rounds resubmitting objects with clipping paths that had been rejected by IS because they usually don't tell me what is specifically wrong with the path and I just have to guess. All of the other agencies take the clipping path objects (no shadow) without question. If you are using isolated objects and your background is white in your document, natural shadows are the best way to go. 422
Alamy.com / Re: Two Essential Links to Read from Alamy« on: November 15, 2008, 06:35 »
Thanks so much guys for taking the time to explain all this
![]() I'll be going over every photo this weekend to adjust the keywords. Photoshop CS3 transfers over all keywords just fine by the way. 423
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Isolated objects on IS, with shadow or without it?« on: November 14, 2008, 16:56 »
I work as a designer and prefer objects with no shadows because most of the time I have to remove them to put them on a colored background. For IS I upload two types of isolations - objects isolated on white with a natural shadow and objects isolated on white with no shadow and a clipping path. The ones with clipping paths sell very well for the most part.
424
Adobe Stock / Re: FT rank« on: November 13, 2008, 13:40 »Joined 03-16-2008 Overall rank 5642 7 days rank 1829 425
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia became our n.1 today!« on: November 12, 2008, 14:08 »
Very nice work!!
![]() I currently have a BME (by far) at FT only 12 days in with 3 ELs. |
|