pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - imageegami

Pages: 1 2 [3]
51
The whole purpose of the RC system is to ensure that most people don`t make it (Bell Curve distribution). It`s like going to Vegas to beat the house, it ain`t gonna happen for most.

52
iStock is not an independent company with any kind of authority to make any real decisions, therefore a CEO is not required. It`s an empty shell of its former self with no soul that has been taken over and gutted, they just didn`t remove the iStock banner because it used to have value. In the good old days it was a fair place and it used to be fun to hang around in their forums. Fast forward to today, its turned into a place that charges onerous commissions to their own demise and the forum is a place you go to to get censorship, insults and verbal abuse.

53
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStockphoto working perfectly!
« on: November 29, 2011, 13:15 »
I don`t think that I have ever seen a site with more bugs... Not an isolated event either, constant issues... day after day, week after week, year after year, endless stream of fups.

54
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Time for action!
« on: November 15, 2011, 15:37 »
I find it amusing that they have the hubris to raise already inflated prices during a recession.

55
iStockPhoto.com / Re: October 2011 Sales
« on: November 07, 2011, 07:48 »
No one knows but that metric isn`t measuring visits, its measuring unique visits. The people who visit forums are mostly contributors and they visit to check earnings, upload, keyword etc. so they don`t really affect the stats. In other words whether or not they visit the forums, they still only count for 1 visit so if they suddenly would all stop visiting forum, the stats would remain unaffected.

56
iStockPhoto.com / Re: October 2011 Sales
« on: November 05, 2011, 15:21 »
The problem iStock is having is similar to the problem governments have when they want to increase their revenue. The simple answer is raise taxes. The unfortunate result is that people find ways to avoid paying more taxes by moving away or not starting businesses etc. And in end the laws of diminishing returns take hold. In other words, the more a government raises taxes, the less revenue they get. iStock IMO is faced with a similar problem now. Short sighted profitability objectives resulted in higher commissions (To the point of ridiculousness) and contributors started migrating elsewhere. Customers followed (Some contributors are also customers, so double whammy in certain cases). These trends are not easily reversed. iStock has enjoyed a market leadership position and instead of nurturing it, it has abused it and the inevitable downward trend has now been placed into motion. It will take a huge effort on their part to reverse this but I don`t get the sense that anyone there has smelled the coffee yet.

57
iStockPhoto.com / Re: October 2011 Sales
« on: November 05, 2011, 14:47 »
Although theoretically possible, I think you would be hard pressed to find someone at iStock to stand up and say that this is a good trend and that it was planned (although they have said stranger things in the past).
IMO the trend during a recession would be for customers on average to trend away from more costly imagerie such as Vetta and Agency and look for suitable alternatives at better prices. At the end of the day when traffic to the site is down by 2/3, and most contributors are complaining about plummeting sales (especially large portfolio contributors which are more statistically significant) its generally not a good performance indicator.

58
iStockPhoto.com / October 2011 Sales
« on: November 05, 2011, 11:11 »
Since free speech is not something that is encouraged on the iStock forum, I thought it might be a good idea to have a parallel monthly sales thread here.

There seems to be a particularly high level of contributors with falling sales.

I am reposting here what was removed on iStock forum:

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/istockphoto.com/   (Re-posted Noodles`s link - picture is worth a thousand words)

The first step to fixing a problem is admittting that you have one (see above link). iStock needs to acknowledge that they have made mistakes when they screwed everyone over with commission cuts, then make things right by keeping their original promise of grandfathering canister level commissions and not reducing commissions on V/A. Although untold damage has already been inflicted, I don`t think that its too late yet to turn the boat around. The effects of their short sighted policies are just now becoming self evident.

59
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Simplified ingestion/inspection process
« on: October 01, 2011, 12:33 »
Never met the man (JJRD) so I have no opinion of him but based on his istock forum communications I`m not terribly impressed. Everything is always a huge success on one hand but not sustainable on the other. Huge bag of double speak. In the long term this tends to erode his credibility. So happy not to be exclusive there anymore. Don`t care for Lobo`s watch what you say or I`ll lock this thread bully tactics either.

60
I will be staying.  I am not at all happy about the heavy-handedness of this new ASA, but I have been expecting something like this for months.  Can't afford to give up more than 1/3 of my income.

I hear you. Ironically, if all independents decided to cancel their portfolio on iStock on the same day, iStock would sink in an instant and everyone would benefit by getting getting charged less commissions elsewhere. In todays connected world, stranger things have happened, you never know.  (Not holding my breath though).

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors