pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - SuperPhoto

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 47
51
Look this youtuber, influencer talking about make snapshots with smartphones in order to sell photos in Shutterstock, she is very funny, " it is too easy and make a lot of money!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxpGzdMzjFk
 :)

Mm funny. Seems there is much more money in TELLING people "how to make billions of dollars from fotos!" than actually doing it :P

52
Quick question:
Can I use motion graphics from Envato or MotionArray (with their commercial license) in my stock footage and upload it to agencies like Pond5 or Shutterstock?

Not sure if resale as part of footage is allowed.

Lol, hard no. If you want to get your account banned, sure. Otherwise, definitely a hard no. The commercial license does not permit resale of the assets of your own, and even if it did - the licenses for the various agencies don't permit it unless you created it yourself. Are you east indian? That's an odd question to ask - but then just realized you have a brand new account.

Thanks for the reply, but I think there was a misunderstanding.

Im not asking about re-uploading Envato or MotionArray templates by themselves. Im asking if I can use motion graphics from Envato/MotionArray (with a commercial license) as part of my own original stock footagefor example, to add animated text or design elements to videos Ive shot myself and then upload that final composition to stock platforms like Pond5 or Shutterstock.

To be clear, Im talking about using those assets in a transformative, incorporated way where the motion graphics are just one element supporting the final productnot the main focus or resold as-is. Think of how some contributors add text animations, UI elements, or HUD overlays on top of their own clips. Thats what Im referring to. Similar to what you see contributors doing in this video: https://youtu.be/kfkPfSFCBLw?si=fhW0c4r8AZ6Vg1Lr

Also, just to clarify this isnt a brand new account because Im a newbie. I deleted my old account because I was using my real name, and people could easily find my stock portfolios. Since I shoot high-quality visuals that sell well, I prefer to keep my portfolios privateespecially in the age of AI, where copying style and ideas is easier than ever.

So my original question was, is this allowed, or not?

I alway read the the license agreements for agencies, and while off the top of my head I don't recall which agencies specifically said what - I do recall that most of them explicitly (for contributor agreements) ALSO say a hard no. You are NOT permitted to "re-incorporate" other elements into your final works. (aka "derivative works").

One big obvious reason is - if you were - at what point would it become a "truly original" work as opposed to simply reselling someone's asset? I.e., if you used 9 seconds of footage and only had 1 second of your own original footage, would "that" be an original work? Or 8 seconds + 2? Or 7+3? etc, etc.

So again - answer is a hard no. Unless, of course you want to get your account deactivated really really fast, well then... Otherwise - no.

53
Quick question:
Can I use motion graphics from Envato or MotionArray (with their commercial license) in my stock footage and upload it to agencies like Pond5 or Shutterstock?

Not sure if resale as part of footage is allowed.

Lol, hard no. If you want to get your account banned, sure. Otherwise, definitely a hard no. The commercial license does not permit resale of the assets of your own, and even if it did - the licenses for the various agencies don't permit it unless you created it yourself. Are you east indian? That's an odd question to ask - but then just realized you have a brand new account.

54
thank-you for putting that together!

55
Quote
a) I think their looks have a lot to do with what they're trying to portray. They want to come across as just "average" young women to appeal to a broad audience. Even the name Jade (doubt it's her real name) and Charlotte are quite average names. Candid camera angles with natural lighting, also little use of make up.

b) Def

c) Nothing wrong with bold claims but people need to back it up with actual proof and legitimate screenshots.

d) I went through quite a few of the videos and one made me laugh, went something like "I uploaded this image on Friday and on Sunday I earned $1k), it's too outrageous and how do people fall for this crap.

e) Jade deletes negative comments. Charlotte is newer to the game and has left some up. There was someone who asked Charlotte for a link to her portfolio (completely legitimate request) and she replied that she got hacked and won't give it away lol.

Was scrolling through some stock photography TikToks and came across Jade a while back and Charlotte only this week.

Interesting, wow...

Well... if you are interested in ANOTHER article, lol... could send you some links to these...

One thing that has been "big" the last 5 years is for:

a) (Primarily) east indians to take images from free photo sites (i.e., pixabay and I forget the other at the moment). (Some massively download them, like 10,000+).
b) Pass the photographs off as their own (violating the license terms because they don't give attribution which some require, and then also simply slap them together without any modification, which also violates the license terms) of landscape "books" and sell them on amazon
c) And they do it in the cheapest, crappiest, fastest manner possible to just churn out crappy garbage. (I.e., "minimum page count" is 40 pages, so they do the bare minimum, then slap the photos they've essentially stolen because it violates the terms of the licenses, and sometimes put images in sideways, "stretch" the images to fill the page, and just a general mismash).
d) Have "author names" like "Akbar habdul" or "Sanjitt Sakadabar", etc...
e) Some have 500+ "books".

They spam the crap out of it... Amazon at the moment doesn't seem to care because they mainly care about $$$, and seem to be making lots of $$$ from it.

Came across this kind of garbage when I was looking to put together my own photo book. (Which, incidentally if you want to put together a QUALITY book, is a fair amount of time/work).

Upon further exploration, realized they is a crapload of other spam being churned out, from "coloring books" (with artifacts, missing limbs, extra limbs, etc, etc), to "travel guides" (which are 100+ chatgpt generated guides many times with inaccurate or misleading information), etc, etc... And then again (usually east indian/arabic) - writing "books" as "authoritative experts" on various subjects such as pyschotherapy, health/nutrition, personal finances, etc - pretty much all with chatgpt churned out garbage/junk... Sometimes quite funny reading the comments on these "books" - basically ppl that purchased it will be like "what is this pile of sh*t"... And then in some of the FB forums - it is rather (in a way) funny for them to come complaining/whining that one of their "books" wasn't published - but that seems to be mainly people who really have utter garbage... (like, I think one of the titles of one guys "expert books" was "how to deal with overmast___tion" and had a step by step guide I think it was from chatgpt... haha).

56
Huh.

Interesting article - quickly reviewed the accounts - I'd be inclined to agree.

a) They don't appear to actually share/talk about any actual photos, just make bold claims. (Incidentally, one girl is rather ugly - but - if she's taking advantage of people - could be why. The 2nd one while a little 'better' looking, also looks a bit ugly in a way - probably for the same reason).

b) They do seem to have similar scripts, including have a small # of videos, and even being so lazy as to not even change the tiktok tagline (i.e., "captured by jade" vs "captured by charlotte").

c) I've personally witnessed people making bold claims to sell stuff - only to reveal in private groups/forums/etc that they were making a fraction of the sales and instead were just hawking e-books. I've also (in the past) purchased stuff which turned out just to be pure recycled garbage.

(d) Lol - I also agree with your comment that their bold claims of making $400, or $10k from "just one photo!" - unless they somehow built a time machine and went back to 2005 to upload to shutterstock - are greatly exagerrated, if not even non existant.

(e) It is interesting reading the comments - people do seem to be a little wiser nowadays basically saying 'okay, show me the proof', or 'sounds like you are full of dogpoo'.

How did you come across these accounts?


57
Sadly I seemed to had joined shitterstock (around 2019 or 2020 I think) when they started screwing over people with Jon Oringer during convid... Stopped uploading quite some time ago, as "$0.25" seemed to be the "norm". Every now and then (i.e., every 1-2 months) I might get a "larger" video sale, but not worth the time to upload there any more.

Not to mention their interface was extremely annoying, random "ai" rejections, and difficult to use...

58
I'm not sure what it is that is going on... The last couple months some of my regular sales dropped by about 30-50%, when I was expecting it to the opposite (I was expecting a 30-50% increase). I will see. Perhaps it will get better. Working on making that happen.

59
hmm. how's everyone doing? very slow week for me, quite concerning...!

60
This article was posted by Primus1 in the pond5 forums.

Very optimistic for the future of video.

https://www.verifiedmarketreports.com/product/stock-video-market/

STOCK VIDEO MARKET INSIGHTS
Stock Video Market Market was valued at USD 4.5 Billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 10.8 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 13.5% from 2024 to 2030.


Interesting article, thanks! Some interesting insights here too...

61
Sigh.

back on ignore...

haha. sigh. wah wah wah. who'd you put on ignore, & do you think they actually care? lol, extremely funny that you feel the need to announce that...

62
Lol - where is everyone's daily rankings?!??!?!?!

I was enjoying those! Please start posting again! :) It was informative, and I liked seeing how other people were performing as well... cheers!

When do we get to have a peek at yours? You get to have a peek at ours.

I need to get them a bit higher first...

63
ty! :)

64
Lol - where is everyone's daily rankings?!??!?!?!

I was enjoying those! Please start posting again! :) It was informative, and I liked seeing how other people were performing as well... cheers!

65
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 28, 2025, 14:04 »
There is no way in Germany to own any kind of property or land and not pay local taxes. It is not much though, around 30 euros a month or 300-400 a year. Municipality costs for garbage etc.. are a lot higher and a bigger problem.  Plus occasional repairs that we share as owners but can be quite high.

I have around 50sqm, the place is fully paid, no debts.

It is funny what you say about the "dark brown masses" of whatever part of the world you personally don't like.

Here in Europe we think that way about the white hillibilly americans that are part of a cult and happily do their masters bidding and long to live under a king or emperor. Unfortunately they also want gigantic wars with millions dead to fullfill their rapture religious fantasies...they are unbelievably uneducated, can barely read and write but always have an opinion...

The ai youtube spammers are the same people that bring you all the crypto scams and there are also lots of very clueless white people who think ai images is some magic money.n

There is also one very simple reason that ai attracts many people from ultrapoor countries...50 dollars a month can be like 500 in the us midwest or 2000 here in Germany.

So the high volume but low income ports, make a lot of financial sense to that group of producers.

They are just as clueless as the mobile phone crowd that started doing stock 10 years ago.

Microstock are open platforms for total amateurs. But the talent can learn and rise, including the ai talent.

I am not worried about ai producers, like I am not worried about the mobile phone talent. Most will give up in 2 years and only a few that remain will actually be regular producers.

I hate having bestsellers copied, so I hope the new strategy of a long tail plus editorial will lower that problem.

But I am glad you liked my analysis, I am posting here because I know many people who have neglected their ports and are wondering if it is still worth getting in.

However everyones situation is different and what sold well 20 years ago will not sell in the same way today.



Adapt or die like in every business.

1. Lol - it's not I don't "like" a certain group - it's simply stating a fact how different groups act, and what 'business ethics' they have (or don't have). (And lol, don't believe I've ever referred to them as the 'dark brown masses').

b) Re: what's really going on - each group (speaking of the 'general masses') depending on their country seems to have had their beliefs about other cultures/races/etc shaped by television, the "news", etc.

c) As for your perception of americans, interesting that is what would be filtered down to you, and assuming that is what is presented to German people through t.v./the news/etc. Have you ever lived in the the US for an extended period of time? The t.v. (in the usa) generally portrays the military as a noble cause (and I don't think many know or realize that unfortunately they are being 'used' by a small group of psychopaths to cause chaos in the world, get oil, get gold, control the drug trade/etc. (And interestingly enough, apparently this small groups congregates in the vatican in europe, as well as the ukraine. I think most soldiers (and not just the us, but canada, europe, etc) unfortunately don't see the bigger picture - and the way the military is structured - its designed to keep it that way. I think most people that join the military genuinely believe they are doing good (its only the people at the very top that really know what is going on). (Kind of like freemasonry as well that relies extensively on 'secrets'. Those @ the bottom believe they are genuinely doing good, and in some ways they are - but @ the top - they really know what is going on and are manipulating the masses generally speaking for other purposes).

Not sure if you are aware of this - but I'd say that in North America - through schooling - Germans (generally speaking) are portrayed as really bad "nahzees" through constant bombardment of movies, tell-a-vision, etc, that "hatejews" and "attack" them at every turn, etc, etc. (Even though apparently what really happened in the his-story (aka fiction) books for the most part consists of lies, misdirection, and even if there was an individual who acted a certain way - it doesn't mean their offspring, relatives, etc would be the same). I'd say very few people (unless they've looked into it further) know that a lot of Germans are very intelligent, very good engineers, and many of them (if they come to North America) are fearful of being associated what the t.v., the history books, the schooling, etc portrays them to be (which, pretty much consists of lies/manipulation/etc).  Many - if they move here - are so fearful of being associated with that - tend to 'overcompensate' and state their 'love' for the jewishpeople/how wonderful they are/etc, and how they would never to anything so heinous as portrayed in the (hi)story books, so they aren't visciously attacked (from how the t.v., the movies, and schooling portrays them as in general).

But the people pulling the strings like to try and keep people at odds.

d) I would agree with you that a lot of people (in general, not just north america) - are kept 'dumbed down'. Not sure what your definition of being able to 'barely read' is - but yes - schooling (in general) teaches children to 'read slowly' (as a control mechanism), through something called 'sub-vocalization'. (I.e., people generally 'hear' words when they read as opposed to 'visually' reading (aka speed reading), which severely limits their comprehension of topics, how much they can consume, and makes it difficult to learn new things). Apparently - the schooling (controlled in a big part by the Rockefeller family) is designed to keep the general masses able to follow simple instructions (i.e., "dont park here"), but not really able to see much farther than that.

I think that is partly why video is so popular. Yes, it 'looks nice' - but - you can only consume so much video at once, and the 'speed' is throttled. (I.e., one could read a complete 200 page book (60,000 words in a paperback) in 2-3 hours (with subvocalization), 30 minutes with speed reading, but to watch the same video (at a speaking rate of about 140 wpm) would take about 7-8 hours.

e) I  do agree with you that there are also 'clueless ai caucasian' people... but the "AI" has been introduced into those (what people tend to call '3rd world countries) in order to try and make a super poor class, by stealing from people (who tend to be white/caucasian) that did the work in the first place. (And interestingly enough, tends by the very super wealthy class - which tends to be 'jewish', just look @ the background of the ceo of midjourney, chatgpt, etc and who tends to fund the other 'ai' companies - and they in general use their vast financial resources to try and cast dispersion if anyone questions their tactics and/or states the obvious. I.e., through things like 'anti-hate' legislature, constant movies about WWII and the 'plight' they face, and constant tell-a-vision programming to make them (in general) appear as a poor, hard done by group that is 'just being picked on'. In general - if anyone says anything - the same television programming as trained many people to respond "omfg! anti-semite", etc - instead of actually doing some investigation for themselves to see if there is merit to the statement. It is a psychological manipulation tactic designed to 'short-circuit' peoples brains/thinking & reasoning capacity.

But bottomline - one of the things going on (esp with "ai", which is simply sophisticated theft) - is "they" (the ultra-rich class that likes to call themselves the 'plutocracy') - are trying to steal as much as they can and make everyone else into poor slaves.

2. a) Wow re: the 50 sqm. By north american standards, that is a very tiny house. (Do you have a family living there too? Or just yourself?)
b) While I haven't looked fully into how German property is structured - I've found in North America people are taught to believe the same thing (i.e., that they 'have' to pay 'property tax' 'or else!') - but requires a bit of digging to realize you don't. But the big fact is - if one pays property tax, and the threat is that if they don't, it will be 'seized' - then they don't actually 'own' the property - but are rather 'renting' the property. It may be a small rent - but it is still rent. And like rent - the landlord at any time could 'see fit' to raise the rent (aka 'taxes'), and if the tenant is not able to pay, use the 'legal system' to kick them out.

3. In terms of still getting in... I agree with you people would need to be smarter about it if they wanted to make some serious $$$... whether it is figuring out how to more intelligent increase production, or more intelligently meet client needs - it does require thinking, which can supercede the spam-all-you-can model employed by a lot of people in '3rd world' countries...

66
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 28, 2025, 09:10 »
Yes, I am very confident that I can return to something between 2-3k a month on average. I would love a steady 4k, but I cannot make that projection now, I can think about how to achieve that once I reach a reliable 2k.
...

Interesting analysis/thoughts... A couple things.

a) "orange man" stuff - lol - what is really going on (in world affairs) doesn't matter WHO is in - "they" are trying to bankrupt EVERYONE (and make one rich superclass, and one big poor class). So if you recognize that, you can plan accordingly. It's not BECAUSE "the orange man" is in office - (it would be EXACTLY same push if say 'biden' or equivalent was in office, just done a 'different way, i.e., w/attacking traditional families promoting gay/trans/les/etc stuff to try and make people so dysfunctional that they NEED handouts from the state/etc)... "Trade wars" are just trying to push the same nonsense a different way - i.e., still trying to make people dependent on "handouts from the state" because of "omfg! trade wars!"... BOTH sides (which are controlled by a small group of literal pyschopaths) are pushing the SAME agenda, just trying it different ways... and that is worldwide - not just usa, includes germany with 'mass immigration', canada with 'mass immigration, etc, etc) - so be aware of that.

b) If you pay taxes to 'keep your home', under threat of losing it if you 'don't pay taxes', you don't actually 'own' it - you rent it... no mater how small or big the amount. There are ways (so I've heard - I am not fully aware of how to do this at this time,  just because I haven't really looked in great detail - but am aware that apparently there are people that have done it) - of actually "owning" your home/your land WITHOUT paying "rent" in the form of taxes... since you have some free time, you might look into that. First requires changing your perception of 'taxes' - and realizing it is theft/theft of labor, not "obligatory", and that if you are paying it - you are RENTING your home and RENTING your land, you don't actually OWN it.

c) Your unique/portfolio diversification is an interesting idea. It does seem to be working for you - because your portfolio is smaller than others and yet seems to be outperforming them (at least in terms of downloads). So large portfolio does not necessarily equate with 'more sales'. Interesting strategy.

d) Part of what is going on with the "ai" is enabling the (literal) hordes of east indians/arabs/african/etc countries who don't necessarily have any real talent or skill, to basically steal from those who do in order to try and flood the market with competing assets. Now because for the most part they (in general) are so lazy, greedy, spammy, corrupt (and in many ways literally 'dumb' just because they've never really taken the time to become good at something), - it does make your job a bit easier if you recognize that. Which - in some ways it sounds that you have (because you recognize they are just super lazy and try and copy high performing assets, so by making mid-range assets you do seem to be effectively insulating yourself from that). So that is smart.

Perhaps recognize that is only likely to increase - and adjust your strategy accordingly.

67
General Stock Discussion / Re: motionelements payout(s)?
« on: February 26, 2025, 09:48 »
i've never gotten a payment - have several thousand videos there (including having signed up for their 'subscription' model)... the support really sucks - so not sure if I have made sales - just they haven't 'logged' it (i.e., kept it) or what... doesn't make sense that over several years would have 'never' made a sale there...

68
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 24, 2025, 09:00 »
Its a start.

You will move up very quickly with more sales.

my weekly dropped to 1290
If you are 1290, which is very good, what does that say about making money in Microstock? Only 1289 people in the world ahead of you. Very small number of people making a living at this while sales and income are dropping.

Good point. Especially when you know there a lot of companies/groups that we know that sell a lot. So there will only be a small number of individual producers that can reach $3000 or more each month. Pretty depressing if your goal is to make microstock your main income. Unless you live in a country where $100 a month is enough offcourse.
Well, i live in a third world country (Venezuela). However $100 is not enought for living, maybe $500 (for one person with owned house).

Huh. Wow. Where I live - "rent" (not owning) a 1 bedroom apartment is about $1500/month, and that is considered "cheap". And it's not even a big place like New York or Chicago, just a 'relatively small town'... And you are saying in Venezuela you could OWN a home for $500/month? What is life like there?

And... what would it be like (living standards) if you say made $3k USD/month?

69
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 19, 2025, 09:44 »
Its a start.

You will move up very quickly with more sales.

my weekly dropped to 1290

Now that is peculiar. Is that picture actually from 'today'? Because right now I have a higher download count than you with a much lower 'ranking'.
Possibly maybe your console just hasn't been 'updated' yet (so your ranking is say as of Monday or something). Because otherwise I find that a bit peculiar...!

70
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 17, 2025, 09:25 »
@superphoto

"So... anyways - bigger portfolios (including significantly bigger ones) does not seem to necessarily equate to more sales/downloads/etc.

Whatever you are doing seems to be working, so I'd suggest just keeping it up."

There is also the factor of portfolio effectiveness, i.e. a port with a good ratio of sales to size.

Although personally I am trying to follow a long tail strategy in my second stock journey, trying to identify niches and then creating content in the hope it sell 1-5 a year.

These images do not show up in a top level search with one keyword, but they will show easily on a very specific search.

Having a large port, but not of similars, but very, very diverse content would however increase the chances of having real bestsellers, files that sell every week or even several times a day.

 It also should give more balance.

We will see. If we keep sharing stats we can keep learning from each other.

@justanimage

That's why I'm now dumping images into the account with the big bucket and trying to keep the quality as high as possible (the rejection rate suddenly went up from 10% to 30% a good week ago) and then I'll see what happens if I only upload camera images for a while (like 2-3 years ago).
In any case, the hourly wage remains low ;-)


Really curios about when you start to add camera content.

Suggestion: recreate well selling ai designs as camera content.

Well... that's what I thought (bigger, more varied port = more sales), but it doesn't seem to be the case.

Also - it's strange - I put a lot of time/effort into certain concepts/themes that I thought would sell well (i.e., like sets of 50-100 related items)... (was unique, seemed interesting, seemed something the market would be interested in)... and... for a number of those sets, "maybe" 1 or 2 items sold... others nothing...

So lol - I guess I really don't know :P Worked really hard the last 3 months to add significant additions to my portfolio, and last weeks sales were down by about 50% from 2 months ago (in spite of all the additional content), and this week, exceptionally slow start (as of right now, only single digit sales). Not too fun.

Of course - there's all sorts of other things going on (trends, other competitors, spam-all-you-can people, other companies, etc, etc) which all could be factoring into it as well... So I'm not sure... We'll see.

71
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 16, 2025, 11:16 »
@Cobalt:
There are currently 54,500 (and about 8,000 left to upload - currently a few hundred a day).
The review queue is limited to 3001, as far as I remember.

AI png I also have around 1,000 images in my portfolio, but only silhouettes - real png#s are very time-consuming and I'm not a graphic designer :)

@SuperpPhoto:
Yes, I was also under the impression that upload quantity doesn't have such a big impact, but the chance of a good seller is just bigger with more bandwidth.
It's my last attempt in the field of AI images with large quantities by my standards and a wide range of topics to catch a few top sellers.


I'll be using my AI picture account for the last week and then I'll be on holiday - a few days after Iceland to get the camera glowing again :)

I kind of thought the same thing - but - no, nothing seems to have 'caught on' as a 'best seller' (at least not yet). And I thought the increased diversity of assets would mean more sales in different markets - but - it just seems to 'replace' other stuff that was selling "relatively" well.

Plus - it is strange, it seems like there is almost a 'max # of weekly downloads' per account... like - even though I did a lot more work, the downloads kind of just fluctuate within a certain range, not really going up, and not really going down overall. It seems to have been like that for about the last 1.5 years within the same 'range'.

72
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 16, 2025, 09:12 »
So you now have 60 000 files?

I am really impressed and very curious about your sales.

I am going the other way, trying to upload less files but hopefully more relevant.

Have you considered ai png? Seems to be very popular and successful.

From my experience (I was able to get a similar workflow, and did that a while back) - doesn't really seem to make much of a difference - in fact - the 'newer' files seem to affect the sales of the 'older' files. You are just 'working harder'. Not sure how the algorithm works, and it would just be speculative - but your much smaller portfolio seems to perform really well. It seems larger portfolios do not necessarily equate to more sales. I'm actually quite surprised - but your portfolio (in terms of downloads) does consistently outperform my downloads, even though I have a much larger portfolio than you.

Never considered the idea of 'lightboxing' - so - perhaps you just have clients that like your particular niche/whatever you are focusing on.

With respect to the PNG - also did that a while back - and - really don't know. Properly keyworded things, had desireable assets, etc, etc. "Some" did "relatively" well (double digits) - whereas the others no sales yet.

So... anyways - bigger portfolios (including significantly bigger ones) does not seem to necessarily equate to more sales/downloads/etc.

Whatever you are doing seems to be working, so I'd suggest just keeping it up.

73
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray
« on: February 15, 2025, 08:24 »
Am I the only one with a decrease in income?  ???

Nope.
By what percentage has your income decreased?  ;D

Actually since the "good news" e-mail where they were promising more sales (maybe just to themselves) - about 20-30% less as well.

74
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 15, 2025, 08:20 »
I really had an unusually good valentines day with 103 dl. It pushed my weekly rank to pos 1000.

Now...the strange thing is....over 80% of sales were camera content, not ai. Last year the majority of my valentine sales were ai. And I was also selling fresh ai valentine cards up until a few days ago.

From reading around ai places I don't see other people reporting this.

But it has me worried for easter, because most of my easter cards are ai. I should do a few shootings with camera content just to be sure. Can anyway use that for other agencies.

You never know what happens in stock. I certainly enjoyed this.

It will be fun for 24h and then next week I will drop to 20-30 sales a day. well...I hope it is not less than that...

Strange. I did have a good amount of valentines content ("ai"), but I think only 1 think sold. Very odd. It's good quality, unique, etc.

Also odd a bit of a slower week, which is/was a little concerning to me.

75
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray
« on: February 14, 2025, 09:26 »
Am I the only one with a decrease in income?  ???

Nope.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 47

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors