MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - SpaceStockFootage

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 98
501
I've been submitting there for just over a year. The main reason I started was that I wanted to start submitting live-action content as well as animations, and it would look a bit weird to have cookery videos on a SpaceStockFootage account full of planets and spaceships and the like. Could have changed my username, but wanted to stick with the branding... and as most agencies don't let you have more than one account... using something like BlackBox was the only option.

Aside from the odd exception, my income has increased every single month since I've been submitting, but that's to be expected as I've been submitting a lot more content every month. Aside from March and April 2020... things have been pretty quiet since the middle of last month, but I guess that's to be expected. Seeing the same from my individual agency accounts.

Upsides:


Submit and tag once and they distribute to five agencies.
Payments are always on time
User interface is good when it comes to keywording and the like
Popular Facebook page with a lot of help and advice
FTP is fast, reliable and very few issues.
The ability to share revenue with partners, actors, curators etc
The ability to assign curators to handle your keywording etc.

Downsides:

15% cut. I guess that's not too bad though, especially as they seem to have slightly better royalty rates from one or more of the agencies. I think with SS you get pretty much the same as you would going direct.
Recently added a 10 clip per day upload limit
You can't alter the display image/thumbnail for a clip... it's always the first frame.
No ability to enter a 'description'. They call it a description like on SS for example, but if they're submitting to P5, the description becomes the title... and the description is just a duplicate.
Once you've submitted, there's no editing of anything. Stupid typo its there forever.
They tell you if it's online at one or more agency, or if it's been rejected by all agencies. So when it says 'online', it may be online on one agency and rejected by the rest, or it might be online at all agencies.
You don't get any feedback on why a clip has been rejected.
Impossible to delete anything from your portfolio without contacting support... I'll double check but I think there might be a minimum duration you have to keep them on as well. They did say they'll take them down asap for any legal type issues though.
Can't set your own prices at P5.

Other downsides which I've not included in the list as they're more subjective opinions rather than facts... everyone's far too positive in their Facebook group! You've got people ordering all the BB merch and wearing it with pride, thanking the owner for everything he does and how amazing BB is, people brimming with excitement and being all hopeful about making their first sale. Negativity doesn't go down well in the group. Negativity as in facts though... not just unfounded negativity for no reason. It feels a tiny bit like a cult for some reason. Maybe I'm wrong! And dont ever ask a question in the group unless youve double checked the user guide twice. The moderators will tell you to read the user guide. Your peers will post some kind of meme or inside joke about not reading the user guide. Call me crazy, but I just answer their question. Not exactly a recommended approach when it comes to customer service.

Does seem to be quite a mixture of abilities and experience when it comes to the people who submit there from people who are just shooting on their phones to people all kitted-out with their Red cameras and the like. Then youve got another mixture people with their Red cameras who already produce stock and know what stock is, and people with their Red cameras who have no idea about stock. So I guess their early marketing worked, it got plenty of people through the door. I do feel that a lot of their marketing is marketing the concept of selling stock itself, rather than marketing Blackbox (with a bit of collaboration features sprinkled in).

So theyre on about moving away from the gig economy, financial freedom, passive revenues etc etc. All stuff that the other agencies offer. without the 15%. So in that sense, theyve done a really good job of promoting the concept of stock itself.

And while the owner is obviously a talented guy who has set up a decent platform, I do get the feeling that he bends the truth slightly if its in the interests of the platform. Like when he said that there wasnt any benefit to knowing why youve had your clips rejected. I mean, surely everyone here would agree that theres more benefit to knowing why your clips have been rejected than there is to not knowing why your clips have been rejected? Im sure youd get the same answer if you asked why you cant edit clips, why you cant delete clips, why they dont tell you which clips have been accepted where Im guessing the real answer is that it would take a lot of time, money and effort to install those features, but thats probably not the answer youll get. Itll be along the lines of trust us to take care of all the business side of things for you, you concentrate on creating great content.

On a side note, one reason why youll notice a lot less videos promoting BB at the moment, is that theyve suspended the referral program. I think it was two, maybe three months ago give or take. Theyre working on another one and will let everyone know when its ready. 

Bottom line... if there was the possibility to open second accounts at all the agencies, then I'd probably just do that instead. Overall, I'm pretty happy with them though, but I would rather have a bit more control over editing, know what's been accepted and where, what's been rejected and why, pricing etc etc.

502
Newbie Discussion / Re: Selling 3D Animations
« on: April 23, 2020, 04:32 »
Principles don't pay the bills unfortunately.

503
Newbie Discussion / Re: Selling 3D Animations
« on: April 22, 2020, 19:45 »
Videohive is a joke. $11 (or less) for a 3D render? Yeah right, one week of rendering and you can earn pennies? No way, I'll stay with Adobe.

Then don't sell them at $11 then, sell them at the same as Adobe... or more. And even if you were to sell them at $11, you'd probably make it up in volume. I make more on VideoHive than any other agency, even with lower prices. While it's nice to get a high royalty per download... I'm much less concerned with how much I earn per download, than I am how much I have in my bank at the end of the month.

504
No, currently on less than half what I'd normally make in a month from Shutterstock. The reason I'm questioning what you're saying is that "shutterstock has CLOSED acceptance of new videos/images..." is a big thing. Like massive... headline news. But unless you can provide some kind of evidence that they have, then it's just not true. Please tell me you're not basing such a claim just on the fact that you're having all your content rejected?! That would be like me submitting five videos, having five videos accepted and then starting a thread saying that "Shutterstock are now accepting 100% of all content submitted".

505
Any evidence to support any of this... other than you having all your videos rejected?

yes.

But you're deciding not to share it?

506
Any evidence to support any of this... other than you having all your videos rejected?

507
Remember, a large percentage of those 300 million plus images are things that don't have much sales potential.

But unless something has changed drastically for some explicable reason, a large percentage of those 160 million images, or those 80 million images (so on and so forth) didn't have much sales potential either... i.e. 160 to 320 is still double, whichever way you look at it.

...but which is the more important factor in revenue decline...the number of images uploaded, or the revenue per sale...something tells me it's the latter. In the "good old days" we weren't getting $0.38 per download
 

How much are you getting now? What's the highest you got before? I only sell video. I'm guessing the download prices haven't changed as drastically as the number of images in the last 14 years? I would have thought the number of images was much more of a factor than the revenue per sale.

But yeah, 2008 for me. Only started taking it seriously in 2014, and just done stock since 2016.



508
Take out Asian Flu. Not heard anyone refer to it as Asian flu.

509
....resolved to offer my footage exclusively on Pond 5, because to date they've sold better there than anywhere else.

But have they sold better there than everywhere else combined?

510
123RF / Re: 123RF Payment matters (PAYONEER)
« on: April 16, 2020, 16:08 »
Did you log in to Payoneer and have a look around in your account/payments?

511
Shutterstock at the moment has 18 million clips online. My portfolio contains about 25k clips. If 100 people like me decide to pull out our portfolio, that's 2.5 million clips. That's 13.8% of their whole library. Just in the hands of 100 people like myself.

It's not that hard to imagine what would happen if instead of a 100 people, 1000 people do it.

Then Shutterstock would lose 138% of their content? That could happen, but it's also extremely unlikely. How many negative things have been implemented by the different agencies over the years? How many people have left them as a result of it? Have any of the big four ever taken a massive hit to their offering due to people pulling their ports? No. And it'll be no different this time around. Maybe 100 people will leave... that's not the unlikely part... it's that those 100 all have a port of 25K. 100 people leaving is more likely to result in a loss of 25K rather than 2.5m. A drop in the ocean. 

But even if they did... is having 9 million clips going to make that much difference from having 18 million clips? "My God, I only have 750K clips of clouds to choose from rather than 1.5m?! This is an emergency!"

512
People saying this is a good business decision lack any modicum of knowledge how business works. Decisions like this are spasms of a dying company...

Nobody said it's a good business decision, but some of them can understand and accept why the decision is being made. It's important to acknowledge that they're all about the money, so if they're reducing prices then they must be under the impression that by doing so, they'll make more of it. And as the royalty percentage will remain unchanged, anything that makes SS more money will also make their contributors more money. It's not like they had a board meeting and thought... "hey, why don't we try making less money? How cool would that be?! Let's come up with some ideas we can implement to generate less money than we usually do. Dave, run the numbers..."

As for a dying company... sure, their annual revenue increases are slowing considerably, but pretty sure you can't class them as 'dying' until they start having annual decreases.

So yeah, while I'd never insinuate that you lack any modicum of business knowledge... I'm pretty sure you have less than you think you do!

513
That depends how much they want your particular clip vs any generic clip of the same topic.

Similar, but I think it would be more accurate to say "how much they want your generic clip vs any generic clip of the same topic". I'd be surprised if people shop around as much as everyone seems to think, but if they do, that just makes it more likely they'll now use SS rather than another site. Those that don't shop around, and use Pond5 or Adobe for example, are a lot less likely to use SS in the first place... unless they stumble across an ad for their reduced prices. I think people put a bit too much faith in how amazingly unique and brilliant their content is... I can't see an individual removing their content resulting in buyers not being able to find anything close to what they need, so they have to go elsewhere.

If enough people do it, it's very likely.


If enough people decide to buy something similar for a much higher price... then it's very likely that people will people decide to buy something similar for a much higher price? Erm... yeah, I guess so!

514
If other sites are selling your clips for a fair price, it maybe better to remove video off SS to stop sales declining there.

How likely is that though?

"Hmm, Shutterstock have reduced their prices quite considerably? That's nice of them... but I think I'll try and find a considerably more expensive site and see what I can buy there instead."

515
I'm creating content relative to 'coronavirus' and selling it. Recently, somebody said me on this forum, "complex motion graphics is not rocket science"... well, maybe he was wrong :)

Hmm... not quite sure your reasoning works! While I agree that complex motion graphics are far from easy, by your logic.... if somebody makes something and then sells it... then it is rocket science? Flipping burgers, printing t-shirts, selling hotdogs, baking cookies to sell.... because these people have created content and sold them, all claims that 'it's not rocket science' are false?

516
Slightly strange choice of answers. I.e. how much drop do you expect... none, 30%, 50%? And how much less content will you produce? Surely those who have a full time job... who are now working from home, have reduced hours or have been made unemployed... might be producing slightly more or a lot more content?

517
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?
« on: April 06, 2020, 09:13 »
Well there we have it guys and gals... who would have guessed it? All these months and years of division, hostility, confusion, arguments and debate... and finally it's all been solved by a video from a guy named Tim. Well, I guess I was wrong and Trump is actually a great guy. I feel so stupid now, what was I thinking?!

518
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?
« on: April 06, 2020, 00:58 »
Yeah right. When the media is reporting about de Blasio's failures, the media is real news. But when the same media is reporting about how Trump failed to get our country ready, it's "fake news".
Look who's talking about cherry-picking only what fits one's agenda.   ;)

Sorry, but you can't have it both ways.

It's always the same... Obama wasn't born in the US, he's a terrorist, he hates America, is a Muslim, would support Muslims over the US: all credible news.

Trump doesn't have as much money as he says he does, he dodged the draft, is racist and sexist, it wasn't a perfect call, he's most definitely not a stable genius, he doesn't have the best words: FAKE NEWS!

519
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?
« on: April 05, 2020, 17:14 »
https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1217043229427761152

Yes... preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus. Later investigations conducted by the Chinese (and other) authorities did find clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus. What's your point?

520
123RF / Re: 123rf no longer accepting video?
« on: April 03, 2020, 19:34 »
We get zero or low sales but still we stick there like fireflies!
Are we nocturnal stock beetles with no intelligence, sticking to the hope we will find a sale?
Why didnt we get away ourselves? I ask myself too!

Simple... takes a tiny amount of work to quit the agency and you're guaranteed zero sales as a result. Takes zero work to not quit the agency and you might get the occasional sale from time to time.

521
123RF / Re: 123rf no longer accepting video?
« on: April 03, 2020, 05:44 »
Yeah, it's not worded very well!

Quote
Hello Footage Contributor,

We hope this email finds you well.

We would like to notify you that as on April 6, 2020, 123RF will no longer be accepting any footage content or repurpose footage into another site within INMAGINE ECOSYSTEM. We will send out an invitation to selected contributors to participate.

We will not place them for sale without your approval.

Please note that all footage submitted to 123RF in Pending status will progressively be removed from our servers.

We will also be disabling the Upload Page for footage.

We will continue to license your footage for as long as we can and please rest assured that we will send any earnings that you may are entitled to during your time with us. Further announcements will be made to this effect in the future.

We would like to thank you for submitting your footage all these while to us at 123RF.

522
Adobe Stock / Re: 2020 Adobe Stock Artist bonus program
« on: March 31, 2020, 12:49 »
I think it's easier for photographer to hit the target rather than videographer...

Yep... I mean 625 video downloads in a year, that's about $20K in earnings. I'm guessing 5000 photo downloads is a lot less.

523
Adobe Stock / Re: 2020 Adobe Stock Artist bonus program
« on: March 30, 2020, 15:27 »
Out of curiosity - does anyone mind sharing what their average yearly number of downloads are? Based on most of the comments, Is 5000 an easy goal for most?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Last year I had 45 video downloads... so that puts me at 360 downloads with the x8 for videos. Should make the 150 without too much trouble, but definitely not the 5000.

524
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?
« on: March 27, 2020, 05:40 »
And what could he have done about the situation even if he was running, that's my point. I guess that's what you're getting at. Biden is essentially a glorified member of the public at the moment, whereas Bernie is a US Senator... of course he's going to be in the thick of things. Unless you think he's actually just disappeared, when he hasn't... he's done multiple interviews of late, and has a town hall with CNN tonight.

525
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?
« on: March 27, 2020, 03:23 »
Just like Trump disappeared during the 2009 swine flu outbreak?

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 98

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors