526
General Stock Discussion / Re: Scratching my head over thinkstock...
« on: April 23, 2015, 05:58 »
Getty bought Stockexpert. Closed it. Relabeled the collection Hemera.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 526
General Stock Discussion / Re: Scratching my head over thinkstock...« on: April 23, 2015, 05:58 »
Getty bought Stockexpert. Closed it. Relabeled the collection Hemera.
527
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Reviewers Beating Me Up.... Anyone Else?« on: April 11, 2015, 15:03 »
I have also seen the approval rate for my outdoor photography (full frame, L series lens, tripod, 100 ISO) drop from 90% to less than 50%. I only upload one photo from a series at a time. Some make it, some don't. The technical rejection reasons rarely seem valid. The inconsistency has led me to believe it's either reviewer roulette... or they're simply swimming through oceans of (well covered subject matter) uploads and are exercising the luxury of rejecting most of those (well covered subject matter) uploads as matter of policy.
528
General Stock Discussion / Re: Making The Family Work :-)« on: April 09, 2015, 17:42 »
Doesn't look like anyone's working to me. Though post production usually devolves into labor. I'm sure the the kids will love the footage decades from now.
529
General Stock Discussion / Re: Stock Photography in Seattle« on: March 26, 2015, 22:17 »
I love Seattle. The Portland area is beautiful too.
530
Panthermedia.net / Re: Whats your expirience on Panthermedia???« on: March 23, 2015, 15:13 »
It's not just Panther. It's Panther and their 83 dubious partners.
http://contributor.panthermedia.net/cms/distribution-partners They do not allow contributors to opt out. 531
General Stock Discussion / Re: Taking Photos in Florida and North Carolina?« on: March 14, 2015, 22:27 »
Nice people in Florida but the state is flat... very flat.
532
Ingimage / Re: Ingimage - Accepting New Contributors / A Few Changes« on: February 26, 2015, 15:03 »As I mentioned in my previous post Ingimage and SignElements are part of Ingram Image Ltd! SignElements lack of detailed reporting is why I closed my account with them. 533
General Stock Discussion / Re: NY Times on Adobe's adaptation to an Instagram world« on: February 20, 2015, 11:26 »
Adobe wants millions of smart phone shooters to fill and feed their cloud. Hatching little applications to compete with facebook / instagram is part of a overall business diversification plan. Seems every internet - software company hungers for millions of cloud subscribers with long term loyalty insured by the weight of too many stored gigabytes to transfer.
534
Shutterstock.com / Re: 48000000 images« on: February 10, 2015, 12:55 »
In 6 or 7 years some of the sites listed to the right will be boasting billion image libraries. The race is on. I expect most contributors return per upload stats will reflect changing market conditions...
535
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime selected as a beta provider of stock photos for Google display ads« on: January 19, 2015, 11:35 »
I'm also opted out of alliances... I'm really not sure where the $2- subs are coming from.
536
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime selected as a beta provider of stock photos for Google display ads« on: January 19, 2015, 11:31 »
hmmmm... I'm showing 12 $2- subscriptions dating back into December...
I will opt out of any deal that is not pay per download/end user. 537
General Stock Discussion / Re: Where to Live as a Stock Photographer?« on: November 15, 2014, 22:20 »
Pittsburgh. Nice people. Crusty buildings.
538
MicrostockSubmitter / Re: StockSubmitter for Mac« on: October 17, 2014, 22:29 »
4K video capability would be helpful. Please add that. Thanks
539
Software - General / Re: Pixendr - the app to sell everywhere« on: October 17, 2014, 11:21 »
4K video capability for distribution of 1 gig sized files would be very helpful.
540
Adobe Stock / Re: Opting out of video subs« on: September 02, 2014, 10:38 »I opted out from here. Wow I was sure I was opted out of video subs... yet the button was checked! I'm opted out now. Thanks for the link. 542
Panthermedia.net / Re: Panthermedia, another scammer on the list« on: August 29, 2014, 10:39 »
I hate partner sites and opt out at every opportunity. I would like to see a partner site opt out at Panther. Currently opting out of subs or removing content seems to be the only available options.
543
Adobe Stock / Re: Still subscription sales for footage at Fotolia?« on: July 29, 2014, 09:00 »
The video subscription opt out button appears to be gone. The opt out was an important part of my decision to submit clips to fotolia. I hope they restore it. If the opt out is not restored phasing out my video port seems to be the best option available.
545
Dissolve / Re: Introducing Dissolve« on: July 02, 2014, 18:17 »What I found was virtually my entire collection of footage (2,000+) clips for sale on Dissolve for $5 each! Another agency, without my knowledge, had made a lousy deal with Dissolve (sound familiar?). I have not encountered video sites redistributing my clips at partner sites. I opt out of (photo) partner sites every time I can. Can you tell us what site placed your clips without your knowledge? I'd like to make sure I'm not falling into a similar trap. Thanks 546
Software / Re: Apple announces death of Aperture & iPhoto« on: June 28, 2014, 10:07 »
I wont miss either program. I prefer Graphic Convertor for image browsing and management.
547
General Stock Discussion / Re: 3 years in the future. What are you seeing?« on: June 11, 2014, 09:22 »
Agencies boasting 75 million image libraries as a continuing price war reduces contributors return per upload 30% to 50%.
548
General Stock Discussion / Re: Part-timers: what percentage of your monthly income is from microstock?« on: June 04, 2014, 15:37 »My warning to part-timers (I count myself as one, with about 50% of my income from microstock) is this: don't give up the day job. After 5 years I saw the wall. Last year my return per upload dropped 20%. Growing the portfolio 25% off set that in a tread mill kind of way. This year I'm deleting one upload for every two that get selected. I've read the threads that say never delete anything... they may sell some day... but reality is poorly selling images at crappy selling sites are a waste of effort (do I really need 16 agencies?). My return per upload stat has stabilized... the compulsive editor inside me is enjoying himself... and things are slowly growing. Make the art you want to make (and yes keep the day job). 549
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Introduces Music Licensing Service« on: May 22, 2014, 14:40 »
Hope they add sound effects.
550
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1« on: May 15, 2014, 07:09 »SHAME ON YOU, MICROSTOCK GROUP!!!! If you haven't noticed, you have lost a more than nine-year member in good standing from this forum. Thanks to the number of negative [-1] ratings on LisaFX's posts, her posts have been taken down.[/b] [/color] I also appreciate Lisa's input and insight. She has been generous and helpful to part timers like myself. Lisa come back! Regarding DPC: I am opted out because I prefer not to sell large size photos for one dollar. I also opted out of Clashot for the same reason. I also opted out of every possible partner program because I am not comfortable with dozens of third parties writing their own licensing terms for my material. These are personal business decisions and I respect other points of views. Regarding the future: The top sites will have 100 million images by the end of the decade. Cell phones with SLR like quality will soon add fuel to the fire. The return per upload will drop but there will always be a need for fresh art and value in owning good or unique material. So I do not see the stock photo industry as being doomed... just highly challenged. |
|