|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ruxpriencdiam
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 42
551
« on: January 20, 2013, 13:37 »
Simple fix is to report them to the proper authorities. In the States any form of harassment or threat that is delivered electronically is in serious deep chit!!!!!!! Transmitting threatening messages via e-mail is a federal crime in the United States and carries a penalty of imprisonment of up to five years or a fine, or both. 18 U.S.C. 875(c) states: "Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."
552
« on: January 20, 2013, 10:32 »
553
« on: January 20, 2013, 10:29 »
seriously! could you have a little respect for what's going on right now? I've got a small port, I'm nobody, and I am outraged. you are being all smiley and cheerful whilst others are deleting their ports and along with it, their livelihoods. we won't make a difference if we don't band together. people like you are the prime reason for why unions (something I detest) are compulsory. I'm sorry, but I can't understand how you can be so insensitive to post this - IN TWO THREADS - at a time like this.
Absolutely!
554
« on: January 20, 2013, 08:55 »
There will always be specialty stores as there will also be Wal Marts.
556
« on: January 18, 2013, 20:28 »
Be prepared for mass rejections and hard work submitting to top and middle tier sites . First you'll have to figure out what kind of images they want. It's quite different from Istock and it will take some time but forget landscapes people.... and be prepared for random rejections.
I still do believe that IS inspectors are the best unfortunately.....
Good luck everyone 
I've been submitting to both IS and SS for over 8 years and would strongly disagree with your hypothesis. In my experience they are largely the same except that IS is a bit anal over certain issues (like isolations for example) and SS can be the same about the focal point. Other than that they are pretty much the same. My acceptance rate on IS is 87% and probably about 95% on SS in over 5000 submissions.
Just submitted my first few to SS and I know what you mean - 3 rejected for focus focal point, and they are all crisp as from a 21MP camera with "L" lens... I could begin to get a little annoyed if its the rule rather than the exception... I haven't had rejections from iS for years...
Basically SS wants front to back focus, if the foreground is outside the DOF you might get rejections
Or you just got hit by Attila! 
557
« on: January 18, 2013, 20:18 »
All approved at SS, now I just have to get my portfolio in order and give notice... interesting times!
So did you take the initial 10 test?
Yes I did - it was before that message went out.
Welcome.
558
« on: January 18, 2013, 19:54 »
All approved at SS, now I just have to get my portfolio in order and give notice... interesting times!
So did you take the initial 10 test?
559
« on: January 18, 2013, 19:53 »
SS accepts almost anything in terms of subject. They dont have similars rejects, they dont have aesthetic rejects, they dont have overabundance rejects(well walls and backgrounds maybe), they dont have overfiltered rejects.
I thought it was SS which made rejections for 'lcv' - or is that Ft or Dt?
They are having all kinds of strange rejects being reported on the forums and yes they will even hit you with this Similar Submissions--Too many of the same subject. Please see Shutterbuzz for more info even if other then a wall or BG!
I am sorry but the last time I got LCV or similars on SS was 8 months ago. The most rejections reported at SS are copyright, composition, focus and uneven lighting.
Sure but they have also added the similars now!
560
« on: January 18, 2013, 19:40 »
SS accepts almost anything in terms of subject. They dont have similars rejects, they dont have aesthetic rejects, they dont have overabundance rejects(well walls and backgrounds maybe), they dont have overfiltered rejects.
I thought it was SS which made rejections for 'lcv' - or is that Ft or Dt?
They are having all kinds of strange rejects being reported on the forums and yes they will even hit you with this Similar Submissions--Too many of the same subject. Please see Shutterbuzz for more info even if other then a wall or BG!
561
« on: January 18, 2013, 19:26 »
Top dawg or otherwise doesn't make a difference they all should be required to pass the 7 of 10 test like anyone else!
Just cause they are exclusive it doesn't make them any better then anyone else chit half their stuff wont even get past Attila!
562
« on: January 18, 2013, 19:19 »
563
« on: January 18, 2013, 13:36 »
Can the Istockers pass the SS focus test? 
564
« on: January 17, 2013, 15:11 »
565
« on: January 17, 2013, 15:08 »
Dear Contributors,
Everything is back up and running. As always, your patience is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Anthony Correia
Director, Contributor Success
Shutterstock | Bigstock
Working now.
566
« on: January 17, 2013, 14:57 »
567
« on: January 17, 2013, 11:36 »
It's working for me slow but works.
568
« on: January 17, 2013, 11:35 »
35,000 active contributors, site is slow and how do you know it is back to normal?
570
« on: January 15, 2013, 16:22 »
Yes thanks for the heads up update.
571
« on: January 15, 2013, 10:17 »
I have been having FTP and HTTP uploading problems for months! All they keep telling me is it must be something on my side since it is only happening to me! Thing is it works fine everywhere else? ?? Here is what I have gotten. You recently uploaded 077_1.jpg which could not be read by our image processor. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. You recently uploaded 073_1_edited-1.jpg which could not be read by our image processor. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. You recently uploaded 099_1_edited-1.jpg which could not be read by our image processor. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. And then this. You recently uploaded 048_1.jpg which could not be read by our image processor. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. You recently uploaded 073_1_edited-1.jpg with invalid dimensions. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. You recently uploaded 099_1_edited-1.jpg with invalid dimensions. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. You recently uploaded 077_1.jpg with invalid dimensions. Please contact support for help addressing this issue. This last one erased my processed files from my HD and I had to re-edit the Originals and start all over.
572
« on: January 15, 2013, 10:10 »
Facebook is supposed to make an announcement about something today?
New phone? Better search then Google?
Don't know yet?
573
« on: January 14, 2013, 15:55 »
there is Unfinished and also before going online they are processed
They were completed, processed and pending review last night and gone this morning! See you upload then when it is done you edit then you check the box saying you are the copyright holder then you hit SUBMIT then they go to the pending file to wait for review! Oh but you are right! And I didn't put them there so CanStockPhoto must have?
574
« on: January 14, 2013, 11:48 »
his SS portfolio is down again, will see what happens this time...
This image is temporarily unavailable
575
« on: January 14, 2013, 07:46 »
Still happening!
Had put up 5 last night and this morning there is nothing pending so I check my port and there is nothing there so then I check rejected and there is nothing there either?
So where did they go?
Anyone have any idea?
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 42
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
