551
Microstock News / Re: 2008 Pricing and Extended License Adjustments
« on: December 07, 2007, 20:06 »
There is now such a huge price difference between iStock and Fotolia it's unreal........
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 551
Microstock News / Re: 2008 Pricing and Extended License Adjustments« on: December 07, 2007, 20:06 »
There is now such a huge price difference between iStock and Fotolia it's unreal........
552
Microstock News / Re: 2008 Pricing and Extended License Adjustments« on: December 07, 2007, 20:02 »
As I pointed out over on the Getty Share Price thread, Getty had to do something to fulfil its promise to shareholders of generating an extra $50 million in revenue next year. But I didn't expect 50% price rises straight away.
This isn't a move in isolation. With Getty having to reduce its own RF prices, this move brings the two organisations nearer. With the share price down 70% and profits under pressure, Getty has to take drastic action. It's completely inefficient to be running TWO RF businesses in competition with each other, when that means two sets of employees, two marketing and IT budgets etc. Within a year or two Getty will integrate its RF businesses into one and then be able to lay off half the employees, IT professionals and save considerable costs. The price increases allow Getty to switch RF corporate customers to iStock. There are millions of corporate accounts worldwide with big spending budgets - iStock doesn't need the once in a while or ordinary Joe customer. The big question is what will happen in terms of expectations for contributors. With these latest increases many existing Getty photographers might finally make the switch, and indeed be encouraged to do so. We might find approval standards getting even tougher. 554
Microstock News / Re: 2008 Pricing and Extended License Adjustments« on: December 07, 2007, 15:23 »
I would have liked to have seen an increase in the XS price from 1 credit to 2 credits - I get cheesed off whenever I see those 24c commissions.
555
General Stock Discussion / Re: The secret of successful shooters finally revealed« on: December 07, 2007, 14:43 »
Well, see iStock's announcement today - prices increased by 50%.
556
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty share price down 70% (and still falling)« on: December 07, 2007, 14:42 »
Wow - iStock has just announced huge price increases.
557
Microstock News / Re: 2008 Pricing and Extended License Adjustments« on: December 07, 2007, 14:40 »
Wow, these price increases are HUGE.
Small size up 50%. Medium up 50%. Large up 55%. 558
General Stock Discussion / Re: Photoshop CS3-Artifacts« on: December 07, 2007, 13:03 »
Need to know more about your work scoopd - what camera you are using, what settings you've used for sharpness and saturation, whether you are shooting RAW or JPEG, what you are doing to levels and curves etc.
Best to post a full size crop of an example (make sure you watermark your work first). 559
Photo Critique / Re: Gamma help« on: December 06, 2007, 20:51 »
Look like very nice deeply saturated pics to me.
560
General Stock Discussion / Re: The secret of successful shooters finally revealed« on: December 06, 2007, 15:39 »
I couldn't disagree more. There is a serious shortage of professional microstock photographers - you only have to look at the top lists at any of the agencies and all the action is confined to just two or three hundred contributors. The exception is iStock who now have 2,300 'gold' photographers (but 2,700,000 members).
Yes, free sites will be popular. But can you really see the average Joe with his $400 P&S causing Andres, Yuri, Lise, Ron, Dolgachov, Hidesey, Irana, Photoshow, Sjlocke or anyone else of that calibre to lose sleep at night? I don't think so. I think 'free' sites will expose the huge difference in quality between 'free' and 'professional' and I think prices will rise. In five years time the average price for a 'professional' microstock will be 100% higher than today. 561
SnapVillage.com / Re: Is SlapperTown dead....?« on: December 06, 2007, 04:13 »
Good point sharpshot. I wasn't around in those old days, nor for the launches of DT and FT.
However life has moved on. IS alone will turn over nearly $100 million in sales this year. That's serious business. So to enter into a market the venture has to be serious and expert, because it isn't a startup industry any more. Anyway, we'll see how SV develops. 562
Cameras / Lenses / Re: 1000 = What camera to buy?« on: December 06, 2007, 01:12 »
The new Sony A700 gets an excellent review here:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dslr_a700-review/index.shtml The sample studio shots are really excellent quality from iso 100 thru 400 and possibly iso 800. It is considerably cheaper than the new Nikon D300. All in all a very tempting proposition. 563
SnapVillage.com / Re: Is SlapperTown dead....?« on: December 05, 2007, 21:21 »
I agree about the possibilitis Nazdavie; after all this is Corbis we are talking about.
On the other hand the whole SV thing gives the impression that it is being run by an old school RM agency person who simply doesn't believe or understand about microstock - it's so sloppy it's like an afterthought. Until that changes, SV will not realise its potential. It's quite remarkable that in the space of three or four months SV has launched and managed to become the laughing stock of the microstock industry. That's quite an achievement. Still, hopefully one day something will happen to make it change. But at the moment it reminds me of an old Korean phrase - "a frog living in a well has a limited view of the world". 564
SnapVillage.com / Re: Is SlapperTown dead....?« on: December 05, 2007, 16:12 »
Scrappin, I'm using Windows XP and IE7.
Just uploaded 15 pics to SV. They would only take ones and twos (doh) but I did it while eating breakfast so no sweat. 565
Adobe Stock / Fotolia signs 500,000th member...« on: December 05, 2007, 16:08 »
Porsche Inter Auto Signs on as Fotolias 500,000th Member
Leading source for legal, low-cost imagery welcomes luxury car dealerships as milestone member NEW YORK, NY December 4, 2007 Today, Fotolia (http://www.fotolia.com) the worlds leading source for legal, low-cost imagery welcomes its 500,000th member: Nicole Schlotterer, Head of New Media, for Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG in Salzburg, Austria. Porsche Inter Auto GmbH is responsible for 122 car dealerships throughout Europe representing Porsche, Volkswagen, Audi, Seat, Skoda, Bentley, Lamborghini and Bugatti, explains Sclotterer. The key to our success are strong partnerships. In Fotolia we have found the perfect partner in the image sector. Fotolia gives us access 24 hours a day, 365 days per year to a broad selection of professional high quality material and this is what is important to us. We are looking forward to this partnership! Schlotterer manages graphic design and all electronic media for Porche Inter Auto GmbH & Co. Through this work, she is responsible for the purchase of all stock images to be used for the dealerships promotional materials. "We are thrilled to announce Nicole and Porsche Inter Auto as our 500,000th member, says co-founder and president Oleg Tscheltzoff. Fotolia has, since our launch, prided ourselves in bringing together top photographers and illustrators with a wide variety of buyers. Our initial goal was to find a solution for small business owners to obtain legal, low-cost imagery, but since our initial launch, weve been fortunate enough to attract some of the worlds biggest and best brands, and they are a perfect example of the calibre of our buyers. Since its launch in November, 2005, Fotolia has grown to offer the worlds largest library of legal, micro-priced images on the Web, offering professional and amateur photographers the ability to connect with more than 400,000 media buyers worldwide from small businesses and design firms to some of the worlds most recognizable brands. About Fotolia Fotolia is an inclusive, global community in which photographers and designers come together to form a marketplace free from traditional royalties and rights management. Launched in early November 2005, Fotolias digital image marketplace has acquired over 2,700,000 images in its database and 500,000 international members. For more information about the company or to access the Fotolia web site, visit www.fotolia.com. Press Contact: Julie Wohlberg Director of Communications Fotolia, LLC 567
SnapVillage.com / Re: Is SlapperTown dead....?« on: December 05, 2007, 13:15 »
Often when I try to upload five pictures the thing times out - a little red message appears at the top of the screen saying "an unknown error occured - please try again after some time".
On other occasions an error message pops up saying 'invalid character in file name". When these errors occur I resort to uploading only two pics at a time - that solves the problem, but man is it shortening my life......... Re FTP - see the announcement by SV above "we plan to introduce FTP sometime in the next few months....." Not exactly what you'd call 'dynamic business growth'...... 568
General Stock Discussion / Re: POLL: What brand DSLR do you use?« on: December 05, 2007, 05:14 »
Only when it rains sharpshot (which thankfully its done a lot of in the last few days - we need the water here in Queensland).
569
StockXpert.com / Re: Is This Spamming?« on: December 04, 2007, 23:48 »
By coincidence I was just doing a search at StockXpert to check that my images were appearing okay. Sadly, I couldn't get past THIS image which naturally cropped up everywhere:
![]() Here are the keywords: 1940-1980 abandoned action adult advertisement air airplane airplane airplane airplane airplane airplane airplane airplane algorithm alternative angle announcement antique architecture arms arrow artificial back backgrond bad banner baroque barren beam beautiful beauty bizarre blade body botany branch bubble buddhism burnt bush business butterfly cartouche chaos child circle classic clip coat coil coiled cold color colored communications complexity composite concepts condition conservation cool copy cracked creation cross culture damaged dance dark day de dead deflated defocused deformed depth development distorted dividing dizzy dreaming dreams drop energy environment environmental exploding faded falling fashion fiber fibonacci figurine fine flame flash fleur floral flower flower fly fly flying flying footpath footpath forecasting forecasting forest forest form form four four fragility fragility frame frame fun fun funky funky galaxy galaxy gallery gallery garbage garbage garden garden geometric geometric geometry geometry glass glass global global glowing glowing gothic gothic graffiti graffiti grafic grafic grass grass green green group group growth growth halloween halloween heat heat helix helix high high hippie hippie horror horror house house icon icon ideas ideas idyllic idyllic igniting igniting illness illness imagery imagery imagination imagination in in industrial industrial industry industry infinity infinity insignia insignia interior interior intricacy intricacy kitsch kitsch label label larry larry laser laser lasershow lasershow leaking leaking life life liquid liquid lush lush lys lys material material mathematical mathematical mathematics mathematics medicine medicine meditating meditating mental mental message message messy messy micro micro mid-air mid-air military military monochrome monochrome moving moving multi multi multi-layered multi-layered museum museum music music narcotic narcotic nautilus nautilus net net netting netting nouveau nouveau nova nova objects objects obsolete obsolete ocean ocean old old old-fashioned old-fashioned orange orange organism organism organized organized ornamental ornamental over over painted painted part part peeling peeling people people perfection perfection periodic periodic photographic photographic piazza piazza placard placard planet planet plant plant plastic plastic poster poster presentation presentation product product projection projection prop prop psychedelic psychedelic pump pump purple purple rag rag rainforest rainforest ray ray reality reality red red remote remote renaissance renaissance render render rendered rendered repeat repeat repetition repetition retro retro retro-styled retro-styled revival revival ring ring rock rock rocket rocket roof roof room room row row run-down run-down runs runs sailing sailing scene scene science science screen screen scroll scroll sea sea senior senior serene serene sharp sharp shell shell shiny shiny ship ship shivering shivering shredded shredded silhouette silhouette simulator simulator single single sky sky small small smell smell smoke smoke smooth smooth smudged smudged softness softness sparse sparse speed speed spiked spiked spiral spiral splashing splashing splattered splattered spooky spooky spotted spotted spray spray spring spring stain stain stained stained stream stream striped striped style style sunbeam sunbeam table tall technician tek tentacle text textile ticket torn tranquil tree triangle tropical tube turning twisted unpleasant up urban vek vibrant victorian vine virtual visual vitality waiting warrior wave waving weather white woods yellow youth zen-like zoom 570
General Stock Discussion / Re: POLL: What brand DSLR do you use?« on: December 04, 2007, 23:17 »
I'm too busy out shooting pictures to be able to participate in this thread......
571
StockXpert.com / Re: Is This Spamming?« on: December 04, 2007, 20:05 »
Quite right RP - keyword spamming is bad for business. For everyone.
How long would people use a search engine for if all it does is throw up ridiculous and completely irrelevant results? Not long - they'd get fed up and simply stop using it. Well it's the same in stock photos. Keyword spammers ruin the business for everyone. Customers get fed up and go elsewhere. 572
Off Topic / Re: Neat Image ?« on: December 04, 2007, 18:32 »
No - I very occasionally use the noise reduction filter in CS2. I know people say its not as good as NeatImage etc, but on the other hand if time is spend learning how to use it effectively it seems to work very well.
Best thing is to avoid noise in the first place by getting exposure right (or slightly over exposing). I found my D200 noisy at first. Then after a while I realised I simply wasn't getting exposure right. I found that my camera habitually underexposed by between a third and half a stop. Even when the histogram was indicating whites off the end of the scale, subsequent readings with the eyedropper in PS gave readings of about RGB 248. I found that this half a stop or so make a big difference to noise, artifacts, saturation etc etc. Nowadays I rarely use noise reduction. Perhaps once in every hundred pictures, and then only for blues, reds and shadows. 573
Cameras / Lenses / Re: D300/D200 comparaison« on: December 04, 2007, 18:20 »
I've had another look at that comparison and I have to be honest and say I really can't see any difference from iso 100 to 400.
Some might see that as a negative (I suppose we have come to expect big leaps every couple of years) but on the other hand Nikon have managed to produce the same quality at 12.4mp from the APS sensor. I also only buy full frame lenses and I've sold all my APS lenses. I won't be buying a D3 simply because I cannot justify the huge leap in price when it's still only 12.4mp. I should think for most people the D300 is the obvious choice of the two. When they launch a reduced price full frame I'll go for that, but until then I will upgrade to the D300 (but only after the Christmas rush) if I cannot find a used D2Xs at a lower price. 574
Cameras / Lenses / Re: D300/D200 comparaison« on: December 04, 2007, 16:28 »
Thanks for the link Vonkara.
To my eye the D300 low iso pictures look slightly better than the D200 (but not much in it). I'm not particularly interested in the high iso stuff. The important consideration (for me) is that 12.4mp achieves XL size at iStock, whereas the D200 does not. 575
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty share price down 70% (and still falling)« on: December 03, 2007, 20:40 »
This thread wasn't started to be 'funny' or to cock a snoot at the Macro photographers. Its intention was to highlight the difficulties facing Getty (and the other macro houses) and to put the emergence of microstock in perspective.
Having said that, I have spent some time looking at the collections offered by Getty, Corbis and Jupiter, and I must say that I am surprised by the high percentage of poor quality snapshots. For years, these macro houses appear to have been 'clubs' where one can get a 'seat' through the 'who you know' route, or by having enough money to be able to buy a few Hasselblads or Bronicas. I'm afraid that 80% of those photographers simply won't make the grade in the microstock world. The problem has been caused simply by the huge change in technology which has allowed talented photographers to emerge whereas in the past many of those simply couldn't overcome the hurdeles placed in front of them by the macro houses. It's only the same as when other technologies emerged years ago - look at how Henry Ford destroyed the motor car industry by his production line methods producing inexpensive cars for everyone. Many niche manufacturers went bust, but the motor car industry flourished (in a different way and with different people at the forefront). |
Submit Your Vote
|