pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Suljo

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 30
551
iStockPhoto.com / Re: DeepMeta Update
« on: December 10, 2009, 10:57 »


In a private compartment with free booze and smokes, they went to sit together to forge their evil plans as soon as the train left east and into the gloomy fog. Present were Frankie himself, Hercules Poirot (of course), the main iStock coders, one very high iStock official (herr Roger von Mexico) and Agatha Christie.



Eh
my grandpa told me that in that time he is was shepherd and keeping his cattle (iStock in my language) on pasture near railroad when the Agatas OrientExpress train passes near him while thunderbolts are ripping sky in they way to iStokbull and told me everything about they conspiracy and how Frankenstein was born.

 ;D

552
Off Topic / Re: Weird Giant Spiral Seen in Sky over Norway
« on: December 09, 2009, 22:27 »
I think it is something about canisters levels from some microstokas. They want to encourage new wanabee exclusive that is possible to earn money with basic twirl filters over sky of you home or it is just effect of new lubricant from DeepMeta. Whats the Meta?! Or who cares?!
Blip Blip
That is not compute...

553
iStockPhoto.com / Re: DeepMeta Update
« on: December 09, 2009, 21:00 »
I dont understand is it "new" thread about prefinal beta of something called wanabee application for uploading to iStok even this application dont exist or it is not offered or verified by iStock?
I dont talk now about that they dont support Mac OS without Intel processors, and they buggies + that you cant upload another files (Vector, movie, flash or soud).
Is this mean that any damage will not be refund by iStok if it is caused by buggy DeepMeta?

554
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Application pending approval
« on: December 09, 2009, 20:34 »
Congratulations! :)

What's all this about DeepMeta ?? 
I uploaded a few images (my first) and they're sitting there waiting to be reviewed.  I asked on IS forum if I should do anything to ease them through and was told ; as long as it says pending then no problem.  I did keyword them, I use ProStockMaster (free) at the moment.

Am I in for trouble !?  :-(


They want to say you to buy some lubricants before sending files to be prepare after reading Noice for file xxx
 ;D

555
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock in the New Year
« on: December 09, 2009, 11:17 »
With new cannister levels they dont need to employ additional reviewers, maybe even kick few of them and keep they money in own pocket  ;)

556
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock in the New Year
« on: December 08, 2009, 19:43 »
I think that iStock continuously trying to play this brainstorming educative game with us.
http://www.flashgames247.com/play/2326.html
 :o

557
Balkan / EX Yugoslavia / Re: FotoSpring i krađa
« on: December 07, 2009, 17:15 »
Eto čiča miča gotova je priča  ;D
Zamozni autor Jasna je utnuta sa utera.

558
Alamy.com / Re: Isn't upsizing nonsense?
« on: December 04, 2009, 23:26 »
I believe their size comes from scanning 35mm slide or negatives in pro equipment.

With very pro Film and very pro scanner you image will maybe pass at 4Mpix size at microstok eventually on 6 Mpix.

559
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Refund- client did not want this file.
« on: December 04, 2009, 22:23 »
You can get that notice weeks or months later.  They are supposed to show a certificate of destruction that they removed the file from their system.

Just curious - how does one provide proof that they deleted it? And wouldn't it be easy to transfer it to another computer before deleting it?

They sign the form, or whatever, scan it and upload it.  Or maybe there's an online agreement.

They don't have to ever really delete it if they don't want.  Of course it's the honor system.  iStockgestapo isn't going to raid your house.

Sweet  ;D

560
iStockPhoto.com / Re: How much do you like Istockphoto?
« on: December 04, 2009, 22:19 »
Eh lets see this first

From Albert Martin
Quote from: Albert Martin on November 28, 2009, 10:14

Yup... It is very huge problem there. Exclusives are inspectors and they decide what is stock and what isn't regarding to that what THEY have in their own portfolios. So if they see anything even far similar to their work or to their fellow inspectors they just reject it as not for stock... That is called abusing power to protect their positions. Also, they seems to work as team and that is what is wrong there.

and Lisas and Sheans observations

From Lisa
Sorry, I am afraid I can't agree with this.  I am a non-exclusive and I have managed to maintain over a 90% acceptance rate with istock.  I shoot a lot of very commonplace subjects that I am sure one or probably several inspectors have also covered....

From Shean
Sorry Albert, but you're just full of it.  Your conspiracy theories don't hold water.

I can say that Albert is right in some sense. It is not problems with photo images, it is problem with vector and 3D files which you booth dont have in you port or you have but they are too old when limits are been down from today way of quality.

I dont know if I can prove that. I have my best selling vector background which I signed under Microstokgroup banner on Istok for promoting community. After that I make first similar and after that upgraded version of that lets say concept and all of that are rejected of reason of:
We're sorry, but we found the overall composition of this file lacking visual impact and therefore not suitable as stock. With the rapid growth... bla bla

What you will you think after that?

I think that my file is somehow in row between files of exlusives who send similar concept an reviewer clicking Yes, yes, yes... ups ... bah let it live than yes yes. Or some of major Vector Gonzos are on some of Stokalypses so new green reviewer give me pass.

I really dont know why they are doing that because they earn 80% of my image sold?!

For photo concepts I am not so shure but I think there is more perfid ways to reject photos because there is very thin border between overfitered an overuse of noise software...

I dont want to speak about conspiracy as Shean spoke but some is very very smelly there.
Any how I realize that they earn me 20% of all sites and thats it, and I dont bother and waste time in they noncoinstency.

One time I send complain to one image when I get some stupid rejection. After that two weeks are passed for answer EG...
reviewer is mispeled something but unfortunately we reject you sht....
After that I dont use this "fabulous" option for complaining.

What else to say about?
Aaa bugy upload and reset after more than 50 keywords when you loose 10 mins of you life time.

No readings from ITPC data from vector files even they are on submitted jpeg file?!

They Forum? Haha is that forum? Max forum thread is long 2 or 3 pages with xxxx similars because after answer on one question thread is locked? Best is when they try to redirect you on other locked thread in which is no answer too.

Too fckin small and nonresizable window for keywords.

Licking with thirdpart application like DeepMeta which is always in Anfa, Beta Phase and after that that UltraFinalBetaShita is not developed for my OS???

Experimenting to educate buyers how to buy with best match, best match 2 or etc...

What else to say? My Liebe iStock  ;D
Take it or leave it...

561
Image Sleuth / Re: stolen vectors on cashmyjunkfiles.com
« on: December 03, 2009, 18:04 »
I recognize two files from my friend too in this Creature portfolio called Vektorman.
Look like that Creature is BurglarMan.

562
General Stock Discussion / Re: November 2009 Earnings
« on: December 02, 2009, 14:57 »
BME for me
I dont put Canstok, Veer and Panther jet in graph but I will next year in new template.

563
I'll take StokaStok.konj
 ;D

564
Site Related / Re: Welcome to the new server.
« on: December 01, 2009, 20:42 »
It was smooth...

565
Balkan / EX Yugoslavia / Re: FotoSpring i krađa
« on: November 30, 2009, 23:16 »
Zasto se ne posavjetujete sa advokatom?

Kone

Nije do mene stvar jer nisu moje ilustracije nego od moje frendice, a ja sam joj samo otvorio oči to se deava bez njenog znanja. Sad na njoj je da odluči to će dalje. Mislio sam i na advokata al kako sad utjerat profit koji je ta osoba napravila kad vie nije pravna osoba neg je na huteru ko fizička? Poslala je pismo jučer, najvie to uter moe napraviti je da promptno reagira i zamrzne ili zaplijeni ta sredstva od te osobe od prijanjeg mjeseca.
A stvar je da ta osoba na Shuteru ima fotke i ilustracije od raznoraznih autora moda čak i poneku svoju, a mislim da se ne moe od utera sad trait da ti isplate sve ono to je ta osoba retrogradno zaradila od tvojih ilustracija.

A ako bi htio i tuit tu RM Slovensku FotoSpring agenciju na slovenskom sudu to nemoe vie jer nepostoji, jer je bankrotirala... fiju nema je vie al postoje osobe koje imaju tvoje fotke i ilustracije u svojoj bazi tamo i dilaju ih na raznoraznim stokovima, na način kao to klinci podrpaju s Torenta i kroz debilne blogove prelinkaju na svoje debilne Rapid i ostale Megasherove.
Ali ovdje je stvar to su oni bili ko fol MAKROSTOK a ne neki blog klinci bez mozga.
Moe jediono otić u Sloveniju i tog lika roknit bejzbol palicom u koljeno ak već nemoe nekako proverat gun i pitat ga di je jo posijao tvoje uratke i čija baba je njuferica.

566
Balkan / EX Yugoslavia / FotoSpring i krađa
« on: November 30, 2009, 22:27 »
Hi
Neznam koliko se tko od vas sjeća Slovenske firme koja je prodavala RM stok slike ali oni su se ugasili tj. crkli prije godinu i neto dana.
Neki dan sam pričao sa svojom frendicom ilustratoricom koja je tamo zadnjih 5 godina davala svoje ilustracije na prodaju i ono spika 100 bakija u 3 mj i to ako...
Uglavnom nebitno to se tiče cifre.
Malo sam prozujao po Shuteru i nađem par ilustracija za koje sam pomislio da je ba njen stil i poaljem joj to mailom tih par screen shotova.
Kae ona su to njene ilustracije.
Idem potraiti pod oldest first od te "osobe" koja je upladala ilustracije od moje frendice kao da su njene i oko 130 ilustracija ulodano ukomadu.
Famozni "genijalni" upload autor na Shuteru se zove JASNA, a u smo portfoliju ima cca 4200 to fotki to ilustracija i odmah se moe zaključiti da nisu potekli od istog autora.
Ako ste ikad imali posla s tom bivom Slovenskom RM agencijom provjerite ovaj port na Shuteru da se slučajno vae fotke ne nalaze tu.

http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#gallery_id=180742&page=1

Od moje frendice fotke počinju s ID 14.000.000 i neto i sve su uplodane valda ftpom ukomadu.
A po mojim fotkama koje su oko ID 14 miliona ispada da su uplodane oko 3 mjeseca prole godine.
U sedmom mjesecu te godine javlja se lik mojoj frendici sa spikom jel ima jo ilustracija i da će od sad isplata biti skoro svaki mjesec a ova uopće nema pojma da lik to dila već 3-4 na Shuteru bez njenog znanja, a ona rekla da ne i da nebi se vie snjima igrala jer malo zarađuju, jo joj prodao spiku kako su sad oni u EU i da trebaju prilagodit nove račune i sl. ludorije i to prodaje spiku kad mu je već firma ugaena tj taj Makro Slovenski stok. to je jo gore prola je i cijela jedna godina + ono od prije spomenuto i taj famozni autor JASNA dila njene ilustracije na shuteru, a nije dobila ni lipe od toga?!?!

Prije par dana sam upisao frendicu na Shuter prola je s 10/10 ilustracija od prve i rekao joj da stavlja ono to hoće to joj je off na shuter, a ne da joj neka ua dila njene ilustracije umjesto nje i bez njenog znanja.

Neznam da li ste skuili ovo bi bio bum i za novine kako propala Slovenska MakroStok agencija iz očaja prodaje fotke i ilustracije njezinih bivih autora bez njihovog znanja na mikrostoku!!!!!!!!!!

Pomogao sam joj da napie pismo Shuteru da te onaj gore link izbrie, (lobotomira to bi ja napravio) to se očekuje valda sad iz dana u dan, pa eto provjerite jel ima tamo i vaih uradaka dok je taj akaunt jo iv.

Na drugim stokovima nisam ni traio val je i to bilo previe za te busmismenj lofence jer sam vidio da su za ključne riječi totalni papci, mam se vidi da je neka tajnica uplodala ukradenu galeriju bez svog znanja.

- Ako neko ima force i elje nek ovo prevede i na engleski jer mislim da bi i tu bilo zanimljivo pod nazivom Debakl malih Makrostokova, pogotovo oko novih pacijenata na forumu koji njondraju oko mikrostoka, a ja fakat nemam force.

567
Site Related / Re: MicrostockGroup Rank - What's yours
« on: November 26, 2009, 21:11 »
Dreamstime
    Sales    54 / 392
    Uploads    118 / 392
iStockPhoto
    Sales    142 / 449
    Uploads    157 / 449

568
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS Front Page Today
« on: November 25, 2009, 21:22 »
I think that numbers count present all "authors" which never send first 10 photos, illustrations or whatever for review.
I think the contributor chart from iStock is more relevant
http://istockcharts.multimedia.de/
about 30.000 contributors and I think it is the easier way to be contributor on iStock with 4 initial images than on Shufter with 10.
I think on world wide scene that is less than 50.000 real contributors for Microstock, and then in that number you can count 20/80% rule.

569
Software - General / Re: Windows 7
« on: November 25, 2009, 20:55 »
My Commodore 64 is still running...  ;D (under poor Mitjotoft Basic)
Eh why you dont install MAC OS on this cans and solve all you problems. I dont really dig out why Mitjotoft make Vista at all (money, money is the honey for DeBillGates and his dancing monkey Balmer to make it from thin air).
I dont know anything about this what they called 7 but from Mitjotoft I dont expect nothing what is dont seen before.
Allways will be some kind of vulnerable final beta + xx No's of essential service packs which will slow you can on speed slower than cans you have few years before.
Bah I am so boring with this MAC vs PiCi crap stuff.
Basic think is that works in background with no vunarebillity and give healthy surround for you primary applications from which you are living from without thinking what OS is doing or is it doing well and this was not the case in Mitjotoft OS.
I am not baby sitter at all for buggy OS...

570
Hm
Try Cinema 4D, wery poverfull but complex for 3D.
For you stile of work try Toon Boom Studio, is vector based
or Application called "Pencil" but I think it is for Mac only. Both of them are like classic 2D animation and they are very easy to use.

571
StockXpert.com / Re: Bad things about to happen ...
« on: November 16, 2009, 20:21 »
Ooops what

November 16, 2009 tuesday?!? - WITHOUT ANY SALES?!?!
This is not happend last 6 months including weekends.
What are this geeks are doing  >:(

572
Adobe Stock / Re: FT rank
« on: November 15, 2009, 20:40 »
Huh?!
I dont have or dont know where it is
Overall rank and 7 days:???

I have only
Absolute 1260 and
Relative 930
which is under my User ID in left column

573
StockXpert.com / Re: Bad things about to happen ...
« on: November 14, 2009, 22:37 »
It seems that geeks are finally succeed in something, to dispel buyers and fckup submitters in one trait. Now for Jui may take additional six month for us maybe more, maybe by chance they erase all 3 sites at all in they selfish greed action. Who knows  ;D

574
I heard that you must to pee in this suit to get warm yourself. Can anybody confirm that?!

575
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Sigma DP1 suitable for stock?
« on: November 14, 2009, 22:00 »
THNX
I just realize that this Faveon chip and this story is too old, I think its somehow new story about max year old.
Anyhow I will test it for free but for now 5D is better option as I see.

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 30

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors