MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Shelma1
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 116
576
« on: November 07, 2017, 09:28 »
Can no longer edit after submission. The old editor is still there, and you can make changes, but the changes never appear. So you can forget trying to change things afterwards in order to get words accepted (the new system doesn't seem to accept British spelling, some city names, or slang words like "xmas," for example).
When the system detects a misspelling word (or what system interprets as misspelling word) it is marked with red, so you need to select it and chose "This is correct"; but once you chose "This is correct" for this word you can keep using this word without any future advice about misspelling ... thats amazing so you can create your own dictionary; the problem is that this new dictionary is "deleted" after you get out of the submitted section and if you go again you will get the misspelling advice again...
So each one of their tens of thousands of contributors now has to do the work of creating their own dictionary, instead of their IT department simply not fuhcking things up.
577
« on: November 07, 2017, 09:27 »
They're rolling it out gradually. Lucky us in the northeastern U.S. got hit with it first.
578
« on: November 07, 2017, 09:04 »
Can no longer edit after submission. The old editor is still there, and you can make changes, but the changes never appear. So you can forget trying to change things afterwards in order to get words accepted (the new system doesn't seem to accept British spelling, some city names, or slang words like "xmas," for example).
579
« on: November 07, 2017, 05:01 »
As far as I can tell they didn't actually fix any of the issues, just changed the entire thing and made if much more difficult for the heck of it.
580
« on: November 07, 2017, 04:57 »
If it is as an exciting improvement as the front page change was I don't think I'll be very happy with it.
It's even more exciting.
581
« on: November 07, 2017, 04:53 »
It's worse than adobe. Twice as slow as before, with multiple clicks and scrolls to see anything, a lot of stuff hidden, you have to guess where to click to find it, no indication any longer if a file is a vector (for those of us who submit vectors). Clearly the IT guys thought it would be cool to add popup windows, hidden access to important features, lots of scrolling, etc., and did not consult a single contributor about whether any of it made sense.
Meanwhile the problems they've had for many months have not been solved. I still have to upload everything four times because most of the files disappear upon uploading, still get the same stupid error messages about not uploading a matching jpg, and now when there's an error you get a popup that just tells you there's an error but not what the error is...you have to click the popup to see the error and then click it again to get back to editing. No more seeing everything at a glance, you have to click a stupid button to edit more than one image at a time...I think these guys were high when creating this and thought of it as a video game, with secret hidden chambers and levels and surprises around every corner, mwaaa ha ha haaaaa.
582
« on: November 06, 2017, 14:47 »
I can't believe, with all their website issues, they have once again "fixed" something that was not broken and was easy to use. Are they hiring away all the staff at iStock?
583
« on: November 05, 2017, 04:50 »
I always wondered why SS wouldn't let you edit and resubmit images. Their review process is so scattershot that now I automatically upload everything twice there so I have backups uploaded and keyworded just in case. Saves a lot of time and aggravation.
Many times you can just resubmit as is and they'll accept it, because the rejection reason was pure nonsense to meet some rejection quota or something.
584
« on: November 04, 2017, 12:46 »
I have no doubt that the market for custom photos in a multi-billion-dollar market. But this is just a way for big multi-billion-dollar brands to avoid paying decent rates for custom work. I see on their Facebook page they're getting five or six likes on their posts from SS Custom employees and photographers who are still in college. Yuge success! Biggest success ever. They have all the best successes. What a turnout! https://www.facebook.com/ShutterstockCustom/
585
« on: November 04, 2017, 10:17 »
Truly disgusting. The CEOs of these companies make millions, but want to pay you $10 for a custom photo.
I hope this dies a quick death.
586
« on: November 03, 2017, 08:57 »
If you've read the threads about Getty here you already know why so many people hate them.
587
« on: October 31, 2017, 12:07 »
I wrote to their registrar, who just emailed me the site owner's contact information, supposedly. So here you go:
Nguyen Thi Phuong AFD B030803 CC GoldHouse Nha Be TPHCM Not Applicable 08408 Vietnam
PH:+84.904386367 EM:
588
« on: October 30, 2017, 07:24 »
No, they're giving away some stolen files for free. The OP is correct. I just downloaded one of my own files from there. Scumbags.
589
« on: October 23, 2017, 15:57 »
Interesting that some people knew that before we did...and they purposely upload the exact number that takes over the entire page.
590
« on: October 23, 2017, 13:55 »
Uploading 50 similars at a time pushes all the competition out of the first page of most recent. This is happening a lot with vectors, too.
I think the folks who were using the same keyword 50 times (until we complained enough for SS to put a stop to it) are now flooding the site with 50-100 almost identical images to squash other contributors from gaining any traction.
591
« on: October 22, 2017, 09:59 »
The seller will be able to charge $3.5 (for example) for the same image earning $1.25 more ($.35 goes to the platform) while the buyer will pay $1.5 less (30%) not to mention the fact that they will not have to purchase in bulk. This kind of microtransaction is only possible through the blockchain technology we are currently building. If you do the same with paypal or credit card, the transaction fee alone will be more than $.35 leaving the middle man with nothing. That is how we will have an advantage in terms of costs and value proposition that can be used in our marketing campaigns.
1. These kinds of "microtransactions" are possible in a million different ways. 2. Nobody wants buyers to get used to paying even less for images than they do now. 3. Who cares about the middleman?
592
« on: October 22, 2017, 05:12 »
What they said. Sellers aren't interested in cool technology, and why would we be interested in slashing prices and undercutting ourselves?
Marketing. Marketing. Marketing. No amount of words you write will hide the fact that you have no plan to attract buyers.
593
« on: October 17, 2017, 15:08 »
Is anyone else still having trouble uploading, or is it only me? I can't get anything through since yesterday.
594
« on: October 16, 2017, 09:35 »
They announced on Facebook that they're working on it. So there is a problem.
595
« on: October 14, 2017, 13:36 »
I'm in an advertising FB group, and some graphics guy shared an article about the free sites, including Freepik, which stole a bunch of my vectors and made them available for free. I explained that they stole my work and the work of many others, and everyone should do themselves a favor and just use legit sites and pay for a license. His response? "It's still helpful, tho." Asshat.
596
« on: October 14, 2017, 05:07 »
Funny, I was just reading other bad employee reviews myself. It seems like the only happy employees are the at home image reviewers.
"Working in customer service is very tough, productivity targets are unreasonably high, systems and/or the website seem to always break down or have bugs, there is a shady subscription auto-renewal practice in place and more than 50% of all customer contact is asking for refunds and complaining about this practice, which management expects you to defend."
597
« on: October 13, 2017, 13:30 »
Acceptance of every image, no matter how redundant, so the site is flooded with similar crud. Pushing newer contributors up in the search and burying established contributors to maximize profits. And competition from free sites. I see more and more businesses using photos from free photo sites for their social media every day. That's killing our sub sales.
598
« on: October 12, 2017, 15:23 »
Meh. I tried a search and got all photos, so I added the term vector. Then I got a bunch of vectors that had nothing to do with the other search terms. Easier to use regular search.
599
« on: October 12, 2017, 15:18 »
Yeah, I got a couple yesterday.
600
« on: October 09, 2017, 14:30 »
"A number of groups and individuals are opposed to seat belt legislation. The most common grounds for opposition are: The view that laws requiring the wearing of seat belts are an infringement of individual liberty." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_belt_legislation
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 116
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|