601
123RF / Re: 123rf sort order
« on: September 12, 2007, 16:14 »
Leaf, I hope you meant that percentage wise not the increase to the whopping $8

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 601
123RF / Re: 123rf sort order« on: September 12, 2007, 16:14 »
Leaf, I hope you meant that percentage wise not the increase to the whopping $8
![]() 602
123RF / Re: 123rf sort order« on: September 12, 2007, 14:08 »
It helps I have done it. It approximately doubled my income at 123rf. Now I earn about $8 a month in the average with a little less than 100 images
![]() 603
iStockPhoto.com / Re: No Reviews« on: September 11, 2007, 16:11 »
Yes we Germans do find a lot of reasons
![]() 604
iStockPhoto.com / Re: No Reviews« on: September 11, 2007, 11:29 »
Yeah my egg challenge image is still pending..
605
Dreamstime.com / Re: Talk about micro payments« on: September 11, 2007, 11:27 »
Hatman, I am humbled by your humbleness, 214th million downloads and just a maserati..
![]() 606
SnapVillage.com / Re: I have decided to say 'NO" to Snapvillage....« on: September 11, 2007, 11:21 »
I uploaded early, so my image had a chance to get snappy
![]() 607
General Stock Discussion / Re: Curious case« on: September 10, 2007, 01:48 »
It just came to my mind, that you can scan the banknotes and print a suitcase full of them. With that you can do lots of interesting images which might be in demand. You just need a lot of printer ink
![]() 608
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS Title and Description« on: September 09, 2007, 14:51 »
I think I have read on istock somewhere about this, but I am not sure where: I have in my mind that the titel and description do not to affect the search results. However without warranty.
609
Bigstock.com / Re: Deterioration....« on: September 08, 2007, 03:19 »
BS never liked penguins, they let me upload them, but somehow they never sold many. So my average earnings/image is at 3 cents/image per month, which is horrible. I almost earn more on my referrals on DT which are not many and not proffessionals.
610
New Sites - General / Re: Yet another new agency.....« on: September 08, 2007, 03:15 »
Lol, is this a new way of earning money?
![]() Like: Oh, I do have a part time job, it is uploading to new agencies who are popping up all the time. The images do not sell, but you get money for uploading ![]() 611
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Microstockgroup Challenge - Eggs (september)« on: September 07, 2007, 10:02 »
Good idea bjorn!
If it would be possible, it would be nice if all the grass would be in a similar hight and a bit shorter, so the egg is more exposedand maybe add more sky to the top, with a blurred golfclub swinging towards the egg ![]() 612
StockXpert.com / Re: StockXpert slowed down reviews?« on: September 06, 2007, 00:52 »
Yep a good sales day yesterday and image got reviewed within less than 24h. Seem to come and go together.
613
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The curse of overfiltering« on: September 05, 2007, 13:01 »
I had that issue too. Lately after I have done the "filtering" for example get rid of heavy noise in the sky, I ADDED a LITTLE noise with photoshop. Just a tiny bit.
I have not had a rejection for overfiltering for quite a while although I am doing a lot in Photoshop. Note: That theory is not fully proven yet. 614
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Microstockgroup Challenge - Eggs (september)« on: September 05, 2007, 12:38 »
Ok, uploaded, now I just have to wait 5 days or so
![]() Pr2is, I do not know if they are worth the effort. I might try a penguin with sunglasses ![]() ![]() 615
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Microstockgroup Challenge - Eggs (september)« on: September 05, 2007, 03:04 »
Thanks for the idea Sharply! Great idea really, how can I thank you! No Penguin egg, but I will guess a chicken egg photoshoped in a fitting Penguin picture would be great! I definetely will look into this
![]() ![]() (Even if it will not be acceptable for this challenge, because it will look as a penguin egg, I will do it non the less) 616
General Stock Discussion / Re: $/image/month« on: September 05, 2007, 02:02 »
Ying Yang and trust, I agree with both of you. The numbers represented in the poll are not perfect, but they do give us some interesting data. There might be better ways to compare, but you need to keep in mind that the simpler the poll the more people will participate.
Not all photographers upload all photos to all agencies. I for example have much less photos at BS then at even IS. (I actually was shocked after I calculated the $/image/month at BS. Just 3 cents.) So definetely the data is not perfect, but for me interesting non the less. 617
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Microstockgroup Challenge - Eggs (september)« on: September 05, 2007, 01:44 »
Great idea Leaf! Thats a nice challenge, I am looking forward to it! Hope I will make it in time..
618
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sept Istock lightbox« on: September 04, 2007, 06:44 »
Here are mine
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=4058579 http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=1624988 http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=1903827 http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=3247252 http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=3614410 I do understand if the last one does not qualify ![]() I think the design looks great! About "the more transport images..." I think you should change to the same script as below. 619
Adobe Stock / Re: Silver!« on: September 03, 2007, 17:14 »
Congrats Sharply! still 200 to go for me..
620
General Stock Discussion / Re: $/image/month« on: September 03, 2007, 17:08 »
Adelaide, no you cannot change it and i cannot either, maybe Leaf can.
I am probably not better, when I look at the image which have no penguins or iceberg in it.. Definetely need to improve. 621
General Stock Discussion / Re: A substitute for Exifer?« on: September 03, 2007, 05:59 »
Fintastique, the Microsoft Info tool is great, you can also edit several files at once.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/digitalphotography/prophoto/photoinfo.mspx 622
General Stock Discussion / $/image/month« on: September 03, 2007, 03:52 »
Ok here is a new poll. I thought it would be interesting how much the average microstocker would make /image/month. I have no idea, only that it is assumed that the actual number should be between $1-$2, so I made the range pretty wide.
Here is the way you calculate it: Go to for example Istock, look at your numbers and divide the income of August by the number of your images. Example: $200 income in August, your portfolio there: 100 images. $200/ 100 = $2. You do the same for the other agencies. (We should limit it to the Big 6). Lets assume you have 2$ for IS and $0.25 at DT. Then you calculate them together: $2+$0.25=$2.25. So your average $/image/month would be $2.25 if you have images only at DT and IS. Do not hesitate to take part, because you think you are well below the average or above. It will help us to see where we are, if we are doing well or if we should improve. Thanks! 623
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy Questions« on: September 03, 2007, 03:23 »
If you devide in my example $200 by 100 images, you will get $2 and if you multiply it again with the size of your portfolio at IS you should get exact the income that $200 you started with.
If you mean that for several sites, than you cannot really use that, because you probably do not have exact the same amount of images at each stock agency. I agree. But I really do like that method for comparing agencies. It also gives feedback how am I doing in gerneral compared to others or this general assumed $1-$2 average. Should I improve or not. In your case I think you are above the average. Maybe the average is even lower than $1-$2. I should start a poll.. This method is also great to look if you yourself have improved by just calculating the average for your last 50 images and then compare that to the rest of your portfolio and so on. Its not perfect of course at SS for example.. 624
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy Questions« on: September 03, 2007, 02:07 »
Traveller, it is good money for a student, and if I get that amount, I will do better $/month/image than on some microstock sites, (not all), and it would definetely be worth my time. Your are a professional, photography for me is currently a part-time work. I never have done any photography courses and thats how it is with most microstock photographers, keep that in mind. . So $/image/month on Alamy would be a nice increase. Why should you be surprised? A post before you said Alamy would pay much better than any microstock site. Which is not the case for me, if I would earn as much as you per image, by the way.
However, what can I say, I know nothing about the traditional agencies compared to you, so here I am to listen, what you have to say ![]() ![]() Pixart, you can calculate it this way: E.g. you have 100 images at IS and $200 earnings this month at IS. So you calculate 200/100 ($/number of images). That equals $2 per month/image at IS. You do that for every agency. And than add the average $/month/image from every agency together. Thats the total amount you will earn $/month/image. Lee did it in this way at www.microstockdiaries.com. Go back to his thread about the earnings of August. It is quite interesting. 625
General - Top Sites / Re: August 2007 earnings breakdown« on: September 01, 2007, 06:35 »
10% less earnings than last month. So second best month
Shutterstock: down ~20% Fotolia: down ~ 10% (ALthough it catched up in the last days of August) Dreamstime: down ~ 15% Istock: up ~ 40% Stockxpert: up ~ 50% (Because of two ELS, together worth 75$, otherwise it would have been down 10%) Panthermedia: down ~ 90% The Rest: LO; 123Rf, BS just make up 2-3% of my total earnings, their numbers wouldn't tell anything. |
Submit Your Vote
|