626
Newbie Discussion / Re: Is it still worth doing UBB linking and managing lightboxes on iStock?
« on: May 05, 2016, 18:02 »
No point in wasting time on istock, unless you are exclusive.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 626
Newbie Discussion / Re: Is it still worth doing UBB linking and managing lightboxes on iStock?« on: May 05, 2016, 18:02 »
No point in wasting time on istock, unless you are exclusive.
627
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes« on: May 05, 2016, 06:54 »
That person has 82,000 subscribers, so I can see why they would want to go with the one with 2.8 million just on the numbers. There's a lot of people wanting to make it big on youtube and it would seem likely that some of them might end up as Pond5 customers.
628
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes« on: May 05, 2016, 04:34 »
There are a lot of rich youtubers, so I don't have a problem with Pond5 marketing there. I do complain but unlike you, it isn't about absolutely everything they do. You have a right to make your point but I have the right to disagree with you whenever I want to.
629
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes« on: May 04, 2016, 17:52 »
So how much did they pay? Probably not a lot and some of those 2.8 million subscribers will check out P5 and use them. You complain that they don't spend money on marketing, then you complain when they do, so I fully agree with the start of your sentence
![]() 630
General - Stock Video / Re: PAL/NTSC/FPS Which one is the most international?« on: May 04, 2016, 17:46 »When I went through this a few years ago, I saw several experienced stock contributors saying that it wasn't that easy to convert 24 to 30 and that buyers usually would prefer 30. What's the benefit of using 24 when most buyers will be working with 30 or 25?I've shot my entire portfolio at 24fps. It's easier to convert into both pal and NTSC. 631
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes« on: May 04, 2016, 16:25 »
The video got a bit tedious but he has 2.8 million followers, so I do see why Pond5 would want to be promoted on that channel. As usual, KnowYourOnions is using everything he can find to have a go at Pond5. They have done some things that deserve criticism in the last year but having a go at everything they do is as tedious as the joke in that video.
632
General - Stock Video / Re: PAL/NTSC/FPS Which one is the most international?« on: May 04, 2016, 16:13 »
That's strange because I have seen a lot of people say 24p isn't a good choice for stock. How many stock clips get used in films? Isn't 30p more useful for the web and TV in NTSC regions?
633
Shutterstock.com / Re: Bloody hell!« on: May 04, 2016, 03:33 »
Funny reading that about the Alamy forum. Mention you did microstock there a few years ago and you would of got worse abuse than you usually see here. They still have a few obnoxious morons, one of them has been banned lots of times here but keeps coming back. I don't mind the banter here most of the time, any internet forum without a lot of moderation is going to have people that make negative comments but you soon see who they are and learn to ignore them. Sometimes they make a valid point.
634
Adobe Stock / Re: FOTOLIA account blocked without any reason NO clue as to why« on: May 04, 2016, 03:11 »
A few years ago, I didn't go to no sales but they did a good job of hiding my portfolio. No idea why that happened. Most sites I have steady sales but FT fell off a cliff and never recovered.
635
Shutterstock.com / Re: Bloody hell!« on: May 04, 2016, 03:04 »
Congrats. Try Alamy. They sometimes sell for over $1,000 and you get 50% of it. That makes me WHOOHOO.
636
VideoHive / Re: Exciting news from Envato for Stock Footage and Motion Graphics submissions....« on: May 03, 2016, 16:45 »
From the info I read on the HMRC website, we might not be liable to collect VAT under the EU law now they are setting prices but it would be even more unclear if we are setting prices and they claim we are selling direct. Who really wants to deal with that when there are so many sites that don't have this problem?
637
General - Stock Video / Re: PAL/NTSC/FPS Which one is the most international?« on: May 03, 2016, 04:24 »
I'm no expert but If you are moving to Canada, sticking with NTSC seems sensible. 30fps must be fairly easily convertible to PAL 25fps or we wouldn't have so much bad US tv in the UK
![]() Use higher frame rates if you want slow mo but I think the bitrate is lower, so use 30fps for standard footage. I use 25fps for anything from the UK but switch to 30fps if it has nothing to do with a PAL region. 24fps give a more cinematic look but maybe not as good for stock? 638
General - Stock Video / Re: Motion elements« on: May 03, 2016, 04:18 »
I sold one with only a few uploads, so I will carry on uploading when I find the time.
639
VideoBlocks / Re: Do you get a lot of refunds on Video Blocks?« on: May 03, 2016, 04:11 »Once again Videoblocks is proving to be one of the best and most trustworthy, competent and honest of the bunch, takes the time to read the forums and comes in here and gives a good clear answer to our concerns. Nice to see.Just like Pond5 were doing a year ago. Funny how all the sites seem so nice until they reach a certain size and then they all change. Alamy has been the exception to the rule so far, long may it stay that way. I hope Videoblocks are different to almost all other sites but I'm not expecting them to be. 640
General Stock Discussion / Re: payment earning email address changed« on: May 02, 2016, 14:22 »
Mine was blank as well. Hopefully they will still pay us this month, as this isn't our fault.
641
VideoHive / Re: Exciting news from Envato for Stock Footage and Motion Graphics submissions....« on: May 02, 2016, 13:54 »That is great news!There was some info on the HMRC website that made me think it might be OK but I prefer to be 100% sure when it comes to tax and I would find it hard to support a site that has deliberately made things complicated for contributors. 642
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes« on: May 02, 2016, 05:09 »
That's a shame Mirko. 550,000 seems like a tiny number when compared to the image collections some sites have. I know sound effects is a smaller market but I just don't see how limiting buyers choice of new media helps when they used to accept everything. How much of that 550,000 collection is low quality that wont sell? They currently have a limited collection that wont grow much and had almost no quality control. Still hope they can see the problem but I very much doubt they will now.
643
General - Stock Video / Re: Selling direct via your own website« on: May 02, 2016, 03:23 »
Stocksy seems to work, that started from nothing. It did have a lot of funding but there's no reason why a site run by a large group of contributors couldn't get funding. Warmpicture was doing OK at one time, considering how small it was and how little was spent on it.
644
VideoHive / Re: Exciting news from Envato for Stock Footage and Motion Graphics submissions....« on: May 02, 2016, 03:09 »
Self pricing would be good, now they just need to match the P5 50% and declare themselves an agency and I will start uploading
![]() 645
General Stock Discussion / Re: payment earning email address changed« on: May 02, 2016, 02:23 »
If someone hacked your computer and email, maybe they deleted the notification email from SS? I would change everything from a different computer and make sure the one you are using is safe.
646
VideoHive / Re: Exciting news from Envato for Stock Footage and Motion Graphics submissions....« on: May 02, 2016, 02:13 »
Now they could get swamped with clips any nobody will make much money because of the very low prices. I would of thought this would be bad news for anyone that already has their portfolio there? Bad news for the rest of us that sell at higher prices as well, I don't really want video to sell for such tiny amounts because uploading 4k is very time consuming.
If they somehow buck the trend and maintain sales volume while being swamped by new clips, I might have no choice but to submit to them at some point but I hope that doesn't happen. 647
Mostphotos.com / Re: can't upload« on: May 01, 2016, 15:05 »I bailed out twice there. I just don't understand why it's there. Yes, It's easy. That doesn't mean good. when the site was Brand new it was on fire. that lasted about 6 Months.So you uploaded your portfolio, deleted it, uploaded again and deleted again? That doesn't make sense to me. They don't make me a lot of money but sales are regular and the payout threshold is lower than the other sites, so I will stick with them. 648
123RF / Re: Do you make $100/month at 123RF?« on: May 01, 2016, 14:59 »I would if they doubled sales like they promised when they cut our percentage.I agree, they cut my percentage and sales slowed down. Now I haven't uploaded there for ages. The only thing I like is the automated payouts, wish all the sites did that. 649
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes« on: May 01, 2016, 09:05 »
I can't remember any site starting down the wrong path and putting it right? They all seem incapable of reversing bad decisions. So that makes me think Pond5 are highly unlikely to go back to what made them a great site. Would be good if they are the exception to the rule.
Alamy are about the only site that seem to have a good relationship with contributors, pay a fair commission and still communicate in this forum. Such a shame they haven't taken video seriously. That's one bad decision I feel they made that hurts now because they could be doing well if Pond5 is no longer a great place to sell video. Lots of us are looking for somewhere else to sell video clips and Alamy would be the obvious choice, if they had the same commitment to video that they do for stills. 650
General - Stock Video / Re: Selling direct via your own website« on: May 01, 2016, 08:11 »
I don't think everyone having their own site is a good solution. Could be interesting if 100 or more of us got together and funded a site. The costs would be less than us all paying for our own site. It would have more of a chance because buyers wouldn't have to deal with lots of different sites.
Another option would be to buy a controlling share in one of the smaller sites. |
Submit Your Vote
|