6451
Yaymicro / Re: is something wrong...?
« on: December 26, 2010, 07:55 »Assuming that someone still uploads files there...
right

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6451
Yaymicro / Re: is something wrong...?« on: December 26, 2010, 07:55 »Assuming that someone still uploads files there... right ![]() 6453
New Sites - General / Re: Scratchstock.com?« on: December 23, 2010, 06:11 »
is Yuri the scratch?
![]() 6454
Bigstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's "Bridge to Bigstock" program« on: December 22, 2010, 17:08 »
no popping here
![]() 6455
General Photography Discussion / Re: New Canon 70-200 worth the upgrade?« on: December 22, 2010, 08:37 »Mat off topic question.. is approval ratio at FT relevant? I am asking this because my approval ratio at FT is the lowest around all agencies, like 40% 6456
Adobe Stock / Re: How to figure out what is wrong with a photo on fotolia?« on: December 22, 2010, 08:35 »Mentioned artefacts and noise, over-saturation, everything caused by high ISO. From my experience, Canon 50D gives unacceptable noise above 200 ISO..." I have pictures with 800 ISO approved and no noise reduction, well exposed we get nice results 6457
General Photography Discussion / Re: Got time for a quick personal site review?« on: December 22, 2010, 04:38 »
it rocks
![]() like when you comment the pictures below (gets more personal) music is cool also (tom waits and bruce) pictures are stunning (maybe too much wedding or is your main focus? I guessed you were just in stock) overall is a very easy friendly, and relaxing to see, looks like a fun photographer, nice to hire perhaps! notice another thing sometimes you have to grey letter like in price and other tab.. hard to see something without selecting 6458
General Photography Discussion / Re: New Canon 70-200 worth the upgrade?« on: December 22, 2010, 04:31 »
Mat off topic question.. is approval ratio at FT relevant?
6459
PicNiche Toolbar / Re: Fotolia has gone to Zero« on: December 21, 2010, 15:26 »
he is talking about picniche bar
![]() here its all good 6460
Newbie Discussion / Re: A newbie question regarding exclusivity in microstock agency (IS)« on: December 21, 2010, 13:27 »
You can have always RM at Alamy or other agencies but must be RM
6461
General Stock Discussion / Re: 2009 Microstock Comprehensive Survey - Results Posted« on: December 21, 2010, 06:35 »Interesting reading. I'm especially impressed with the full timers incomes and the six people over $100K a year. I still assert that the people on this forum represent the top microstock shooters, or at least the top 5% are represented here. Nice work! True, for sure a lot more % is under the 1000$ (but we cannot forget that we are looking into around 70 microstockers) I am anxious to get into the 2010 survey to bring numbers down ![]() 6462
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What's the difference between resubmitting, and submitting the work again?« on: December 20, 2010, 10:01 »I haven't got a single rejection for a resubmitted picture so I just want to thanks IS for letting me know what I have done wrong, I guess thats a good reason I have never put a note regardind the "fix" and no problem, but sure it is a good idea 6463
Adobe Stock / Re: Any pattern behind fotolia reviews...?« on: December 20, 2010, 09:52 »Fotolia is different from most other sites, the queue seems to be sorted by upload date not by submission date. exactly which is quite nice ![]() 6464
Featurepics.com / Re: FP Views« on: December 20, 2010, 06:31 »Hi look at your right at Microstock Poll Results 6465
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What's the difference between resubmitting, and submitting the work again?« on: December 19, 2010, 13:52 »
I haven't got a single rejection for a resubmitted picture so I just want to thanks IS for letting me know what I have done wrong, I guess thats a good reason
6467
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What's the difference between resubmitting, and submitting the work again?« on: December 19, 2010, 07:30 »
it is different regarding approval ratio
6468
Off Topic / Re: WebAnswers.com« on: December 19, 2010, 05:36 »It does say on the site somewhere that they are testing paying people for questions. Some of the questions are really dumb but so are some people. I have answered two of them, I am a * genius! ![]() 6469
Off Topic / Re: WebAnswers.com« on: December 18, 2010, 11:23 »I only connected my adsense account today. When I joined 8 days ago, they asked for 200 answers or 10 awarded answers before you could get earnings from adsense. They must of changed that in the last week, making it much easier. I did a lot of research and can see some people making money there but I think all these things take a lot of time to get going. I will let you know how I am doing in a few months. It looks interesting, but we may feel tempted to give fast answers, not very useful answers.. lol I guess with good answers etc getting awards it can go for good but a lot of work, just like stock.. 6470
Off Topic / Re: WebAnswers.com« on: December 18, 2010, 09:45 »I'm always looking for new ways to make some extra money and recently I came across webanswers. Sign up with them and answer 10 questions and they will share the AdSense revenue when people look at adverts on their pages. There's a photography section that might interest people here. I am looking into it, I have answered a few questions so far, have a Adsense account on my blog but have taken that out once the income was ridiculous small.. 3 euros from almost a year online! I see you have an awarded answer, how much have you earn? 6471
StockXpert.com / Re: Thinkstock earnings posted« on: December 18, 2010, 04:17 »Got this late this afternoon: LOL request what if the earnings aren't posted 6472
General Stock Discussion / Re: X-mas and New-year, so whats the plans?« on: December 17, 2010, 12:00 »
very nice job ![]() 6473
Crestock.com / Re: Is it worthwhile submitting to Crestock nowdays?« on: December 17, 2010, 11:13 »
I guess it my first at this rate, just had a IS sale for 0.16$
Friday December 17, 2010, 08:57 AM XSmall Regular 0.16 6474
General Stock Discussion / Re: X-mas and New-year, so whats the plans?« on: December 17, 2010, 04:30 »
feed the beast!
6475
Crestock.com / Re: Is it worthwhile submitting to Crestock nowdays?« on: December 17, 2010, 04:17 »Is it worthwhile submitting to Crestock now they've had a change of management? My acceptance rate there used to be about 2% so it was a bit of a waste of time for me so I closed my account with them. I'm at around 50% at Istock and 90% at other agencies so I know my work isn't completely rubbish! Honestly I don't get them.. They are so picky keeping the best collection possible but after all only a few top contributors have a little success there.. I have sent a batch in the past (like 10 months ago) and also massively rejected.. They have a sweet upload system but to have 5% approved don't think it is worth.. Maybe will try again one of these days but don't believe they will go strong.. |
|