MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jjneff
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 40
651
« on: March 04, 2014, 13:14 »
I don't see the need to have ThinkStock around for much longer at this rate. They are cutting and moving things together which is smart. Only time will tell how this all will play out. Being a video guy I am not affected yet but that won't last long. Out of the 9 video sales I had on Getty last month 7 of them were for 3-5 bucks! I remember iStock saying there would never be a time when we as video artist would earn less at Getty then we do at iStock. Well that was a lie!!!
652
« on: March 04, 2014, 13:04 »
Now that is funny, I can't blame Sean! Smart
653
« on: March 04, 2014, 12:31 »
No No that is your bonus, you must think more positive at the discount will bring more buyers!
654
« on: March 04, 2014, 12:24 »
I think this is our new Bone us oh sorry I mean bonus
655
« on: March 04, 2014, 12:20 »
I think the 8 year olds are working in IT today its a school field trip
656
« on: March 04, 2014, 12:11 »
This is something bigger
657
« on: March 04, 2014, 11:42 »
They are updating the front page
658
« on: March 04, 2014, 07:51 »
Being a video guy I wonder what istock will do with video? They are strangely silent about video.
659
« on: March 03, 2014, 19:56 »
Stock Image Subscription
Were excited to introduce image subscriptions, a new way to license photos and illustrations on iStock. Based on the Thinkstock subscription product that has been one of the fastest growing parts of our business since its launch, our new image subscriptions allow us to better serve customers with high volume licensing needs.
And it's clear that there are a lot of customers who love the ease and simplicity of the subscription model. Combining the right subscription offering with the amazing content at iStock will benefit both customers and contributors, so that's exactly what we're planning to do.
Some of you may know that we already have a subscription offering on iStock based on credits. The added complexity of credit pricing makes this subscription less friendly to new customers who are looking for a simple solution for their high volume licensing needs. When we launch the new subscription offering we will no longer promote the existing credit subscription on our website, and new iStock subscription customers will only be able to purchase this new image subscription.
For the time being, customers who have an active Credit Subscription will be able to keep using their existing subscription.
What is being offered in the new subscription model?
Clients will be able to choose between a Monthly and Annual Image Subscription, which are offered in two tiers. One tier gives customers access to the Main collection only, and the other gives access to the Main, Signature, and Signature+ collections. Image Subscriptions include Photos and Illustration only (excluding Vetta).
In order to make sure that our Exclusive Contributors can adequately participate in both Image Subscription tiers, we will be moving some of the more basic images that are underperforming in Signature, to Main. We think they will compete more effectively that way and have the added benefit of exposure to new customers through Image Subscription. We want to be sure our exclusive contributors have an opportunity to participate in the full range of products we offer at iStock.
What is the difference between the current credit subscription model and the new image subscription model?
The credit-based subscription model we launched in 2008 includes access to all of our files and provides clients with a limited number of credits to use each day. These credits can be used to purchase any file on iStock, and expire daily, at midnight MST.
Our new Image Subscription model allows our customers to download a specific number of Photos or Illustrations, of any size, monthly, from our Main, Signature, and Signature+ collections, depending on the tier.
What does this mean for contributors?
When someone licenses your content using an Image Subscription, we pay a flat royalty for each file based on your exclusivity and the collection your file belongs to, with a royalty of $0.28 for non-exclusive contributors and a minimum of $0.34 for exclusive contributors.
Here is a full breakdown of the Royalty Rates for Image Subscriptions:
Non-exclusive: All Collections: $0.28/download Main (exclusive): $0.34/download Signature (exclusive): $0.75/download Signature+ (exclusive): $2.50/download
Weve made an adjustment to the Royalty Rate Schedule to reflect the new Image Subscription offering that will be effective when we launch Image Subscriptions. You will notice a new tab between Flash and the Partner Program.
Royalties will be reported monthly, not in real time. Initially we will be reporting these royalties under the Partner Program.
The existing Credit Subscription royalties are unaffected by this change. Any downloads made under Credit Subscription shall continue to pay royalties at the rates set out in the photo/illustration tab of the rate schedule.
How does the licensing work?
All files licensed under the new Image Subscription fall under our Standard License Agreement. One difference for subscription licenses vs. images licensed with credits or cash is that customers are required to use the images they download within the term of their subscription. If they dont use the image, the right to use that image terminates when the subscription terminates. For example, if a customer has a one-month subscription, they must use the images they download within that same month in order to continue using that image following the end of the subscription term.
Will Image Subscription downloads go toward contributor Redeemed Credit totals?
No. Image Subscription downloads arent purchased with credits so we will not be calculating RCs with these downloads.
Our intent is to provide customers with as many purchase options as possible to keep existing customers engaged with iStock and to attract new customers, leaving no reason for them to look elsewhere for the right content and workflow. Our new Image Subscription offering will allow us to accommodate all of our customers purchase preferences be they cash sales, credits, or subscription or in many cases, a combination of one or more options.
We will be launching Image Subscriptions in early April 2014.
660
« on: February 25, 2014, 11:50 »
That is what it will take!!! Good Post
661
« on: February 25, 2014, 09:23 »
I didn't vote it down bunhill as I would like to see action over screaming any day. I am sure it is a nightmare for Getty but that is no excuse for not giving a detailed report of the loss to those who are affected.
662
« on: February 25, 2014, 08:48 »
We know photos.com is owned by Getty, I didn't have to look that up. Second the amounts are random and there is not proof as to why they are what they are. I could care less about bashing iStock or Getty but to keep them honest is important. I remember when on the video side someone made a stink about Vetta Video pricing, I sided with iStock but man was I wrong. Luckily he stuck to his guns and changes were made for the better! It pays to make some noise in these situations as there seems to be no over sight for us.
663
« on: February 25, 2014, 08:05 »
True enough but I suspect there will be "no response"
664
« on: February 25, 2014, 07:51 »
Interesting thoughts on photos.com. The claw backs could be related to photos.com as that seems to make sense. If that is true no one will ever see an itemized report on the claw backs! Sending in a ticket will be a waste of time but do it if it makes you feel better. I feel sorry for contributor relations. They probably only have one person to look at all those e-mails.
665
« on: February 24, 2014, 18:26 »
Yuri is exclusive and not on PP
666
« on: February 24, 2014, 18:15 »
This was no surprise!
667
« on: February 24, 2014, 09:22 »
They are looking for new images and can't find them!
668
« on: February 24, 2014, 08:21 »
669
« on: January 21, 2014, 20:37 »
Sales are strong for me on the video so far this year, Thankfully!!!!
670
« on: January 13, 2014, 18:02 »
Bottom line if you feel like taking it and have nothing else lined up right now why not. I would say pay me $1200 up front and I am there
671
« on: January 10, 2014, 11:51 »
No update this week per Lobo
672
« on: January 07, 2014, 08:32 »
Great read, as I have said before this model works only in Getty's favor you have to have massive scale to earn real income let's say they get 25 cents per image on Pinterest and you get 0.2 cents. Ahhh you can figure the rest!
673
« on: January 05, 2014, 08:21 »
I have used my 24 70L the most! so yes I would say that lens, I also use the 50 1.4 and I just got the 100mm 2.8L macro this Christmas, great lens as well. But all around as a first lens my vote is the 24 70L
674
« on: January 02, 2014, 06:54 »
Good ideas and thanks!
675
« on: January 01, 2014, 09:22 »
Dropped 5% here as well! I am sure it will be fixed but this is uncalled for
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 40
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|