|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Suljo
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30
651
« on: August 30, 2009, 22:16 »
If you want "random" try moving the relavance slider for best match around a bit. I know it's asking a lot, but it might help.
If you need help searching, you can always post in the request forum.
Sweet... cool tool for wasting time  Dude...
652
« on: August 30, 2009, 21:59 »
653
« on: August 30, 2009, 21:46 »
Sweet...Dude 
654
« on: August 30, 2009, 21:41 »
Sweet... Maybe we must find cheapest guy who made lobotomia for that kind of "mega ultra turbo marketing moron" creatures? Dude...
655
« on: August 30, 2009, 21:33 »
And what is purpose of this tool. For every agency is the same formula? Isnt easier to look by yourself in youre income eg 300 bucks in 13then days and you have number 23,07 bucks a perday on that agency and multiply that with number of days at that month and you will get precise prediction of that month at that agency in this case 23,07 x 31 = 715.17$ Make this table in exel or in Numbers on Mac and make sum of all youre agencies, and it will be more precise than simple formula on Yuris web page where if you enter same value for all agencies you give same Month total for every of them. Maybe I am wrong but I think that income from every agencies fluctuate depending of their own marketing. Because of that we see different results from poll results each month, and in youre personal records if most of you create.  From this kind of graph after 10 days of mont I can make prediction is it will be poorer or richer than previous. Obviously this month will be poorer than last one.
656
« on: August 30, 2009, 20:52 »
I thing that he wants to buy cheep micro photos and sell them for MID or MACRO prices to some uneducated 3rd world magazine/es whose editors dont hear about microstok sites jet and keep big portion of money for himself. 
657
« on: August 30, 2009, 20:29 »
C moan Dude
658
« on: August 29, 2009, 09:44 »
Dont worry be angry
659
« on: August 28, 2009, 19:52 »
Congratz from me to
tricky thing on iStock is if it is vector and gone mad with selling without reason, after that if you gonna try to send them something which could be in series of the same or similar conjcept they mostly says that After bla bla sinacrelly of growing our sht isnt appropriate as a stock and thnx for that we waste aprox. 5-10 mins of youre life.
660
« on: August 28, 2009, 18:02 »
What about MR of the white/black guy? Do they have both releases?
Can anybody know was Microsoft ever publish any application which is in best way to say Final beta phase?? God guy, black guy, all guys will be fixed in next relise of windozeums debiliensis http://www.hallikainen.org/windoze/winrg.swfOrder Prune juice is the best...
661
« on: August 28, 2009, 17:46 »
If you are too angry to comment than why post at all?
By the way, in English cattle are referred to as 'Livestock'.
So your iStock (cattle) comment really isn't as funny as you seem to think it is.
In this way that will be CattleStock @ Madelaide I dont mean that we are cattle but just they are ... from my POW Anyhow I just forget why I was so angry about them, maybe another 50 keyword "glitch" which they don fix it for around one year, but perfectly know how to steal 5 cents from us at photos.konj
662
« on: August 28, 2009, 16:59 »
THNX for reply
I all ready have my own profile from monitor calibrator and normally he has different name from sRBG or Adobe 1998 but result is same with my profile and with converted profile.
Maybe I have few rejections in a row so I was worry if that profile is one of reasons.
663
« on: August 27, 2009, 20:37 »
I don't see the issue. Sure, the lighting doesn't match the best, but aside from that, I see nothing wrong.
I think that new model release is wrong from STKA, and lighting from new guy is for lobotomy.
664
« on: August 27, 2009, 20:30 »
Thanks iStock for youre very good work on screwing all us about. I love when I shoot 5 mins and spare half hours to manage some model relises. Its fun! its cool! Wiva Stokaaaaaaa Before this I am very close in person with my self, but after youre new model relise I finnaly have much more time with my clients to have cheap talk and explain them that is what they dream about it. Please dont stop and invent more useful questions. People loves you, so dont stop. WE want more questions EG how much whiskers on youre but an so on. Keep good work... Cmoan iStock make my day... Ihaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
665
« on: August 19, 2009, 22:57 »
Could you at least try to post in some kind of coherent form of English??
coherent form of English?? I am not native English speker and I am trying my best... In some cases you are right and for that reason I can ariculate my opinons. For posting treads and post for me is very consumig time and after all I am not shure that what I want to say is placed on right thread. I can recognize what is wrong or what is not and that is only way how I can spoke throw this forum.... If I offend ego of somebody I am deeply sorry for that. This is FORUM where are all of us post ours oppinions.
666
« on: August 19, 2009, 22:43 »
Well... beta is a testing phase where a lot of people are using the program but there still may be issues... many of the bugs are worked out during alpha testing (which comes before beta, just like in the greek alphabet) and is usually a smaller more controlled group.
Looks like Mac users = guinea pigs in this case. And no, I won't be putting alpha version on my computers either. (Though I am glad to hear the project is progressing.) 
I dont say anything bad about counting letters or numbers. I only want to see final version without any prefikses or sufixses or any kind of )))&%%'(&$($))$ version involved... Only I and other uploaders need Fckin Final version.
667
« on: August 19, 2009, 22:29 »
okay, I'm sorry...but is this suljo person for real? do I really have to wade through posts like that ALL the time just to get information on this site? I suppose that is the price we pay to speak freely, less moderation = more info and more idiocy I guess.
lOOk Suljo is REAL person and have same name and same avatar on other sites. if you dont realize or easy find that search by photographers name on big 6 or more. (how they says PERIOD)
668
« on: August 19, 2009, 22:19 »
HaHa
for Mac version is "Final Alpha"
as Mac user i dont realise what is final Beta which is usualy thing that is everything OK for Mitjotoft debilanjerose but?!?
And somebody who told me to use something in Alfa version really needs lobotomy?!?
669
« on: August 19, 2009, 22:12 »
I dont realise why exlusives on IS post anything on this indenpendace forum??
They have they "Exclusive forum on IS"
Veta Beta Stokalipsa or any kind of lobotolipsa who carer here about that because this stuff is provided only for iStock exkljuzives?!?
It is only bad thing if is in they description to guard and spy other forums.
670
« on: August 19, 2009, 21:50 »
How can we help or do something that iStock return Rinders porfolio live???
Why they are doing that destructive things???
Where is they mathematics in first place???
He, like most of nonexlusives earn only 20% and on every his sales iStock earned 80% doing nothing??? For me this seams like that they dont need money.
Evolution is in this case very strange thing.
First like designers little djevery thing and now they are looked for nonexclusives in manner FuckU all.
Anyhow in this case some reviewer must have doggystile pose to explain what is going wrong in booth cases (eg. why he reject Laurin photos in first place which made him "mad" to prove what happens in second place)
Anyhow seems that reviewers are trash can employees for them and I dont care of them in the same manner.
I really dont undestand whatever big you are (iStock under getty shelter) and dont even think about that to admit they mistake.
If you want that kind of killing spree, kill my account and make Rinders acc live again.
Suljo
671
« on: August 19, 2009, 21:06 »
Eh for this...
... is it better to me give up before they solve that problem?
I have 850 pics on SS half of that on IS. if I calculate of they rejection rate on CS I think that 1/3 they will approved?
Is it worth effort to upload to them or they are to much low earners than CanStock?
672
« on: August 19, 2009, 19:31 »
G series is hm "OK" but they are limited to max F8???
Am I right or missing something
673
« on: August 19, 2009, 19:21 »
Hi
As I uploading my stuff to VeerMP they are always files described as "Needs work" but in they explanation is...
This image is missing a color profile. You can continue with this file as-is, or delete it and upload a new version with a color profile. Find out how to fix a color profile.....
I try to open my image and make additional SaveAs just to add color profile to image and upload it again and there is no proplem.
My question is. Must I resave (SaveUs) all my images with color profile before uploading to VeerMP or not or subscribe them as they says "You can continue with this file as-is"?
Any experience about acceptance ratio of this issue?
674
« on: August 19, 2009, 16:37 »
Eh for now problem from first post is solved but I cant upload nothing to them. Nor with FTP or thru browser. I have this message under Finished processing new image files then for every uploaded file error message xxxnameoffile.jpg: Divide by zero error encountered. The statement has been terminated.  ? Anybody have same problem???
675
« on: August 18, 2009, 21:49 »
Eh
what to say
iStock = iStock
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
