701
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 702
New Sites - General / Re: raw-stock-images.co.uk - Anybody heard of them?« on: February 20, 2007, 04:53 »
Don't know much really.
Had a look in there,site seems OK enough, not that many photographers yet. 703
New Sites - General / Re: So which ones are worth the time?« on: February 17, 2007, 12:54 »
Best performers for me are FPics, FT, DT & BS. with FP ahead in terms of revenue.
704
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia« on: February 14, 2007, 14:33 »
Fotolia is good for me.
Something to note. A lot of what I have sold has come off quite low number of views. So I would't be inclined to put a big emphasis on views. It's what a buyer is looking for at the time, he will take it no matter how many views. 705
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT Percentage of Acceptance« on: February 09, 2007, 03:57 »
Mine is at 35.7% and learning.
706
New Sites - General / Re: Keen Images« on: February 08, 2007, 17:08 »
I recently finished up there- not much movement.
It's nice to be somewhere that there is something happening !! 707
Dreamstime.com / Re: Got my first sale.....« on: February 08, 2007, 17:03 »
I take my "hat" off to you, well done & congrats!!
Wishing you many more. 708
Dreamstime.com / Re: I am astounded!« on: February 05, 2007, 17:20 »
Well done indeed!!
That's the way to do it - "take the bull by the horns" and go in. Result - ripe rewards. 709
General Stock Discussion / Re: Trip to Ireland« on: February 04, 2007, 17:33 »
Being from the land, I wish you a great trip and lots of opportunities.
If the summer is as good as 2006, you'll be flying!! 711
Dreamstime.com / Re: Referred Photographers @ DT« on: February 04, 2007, 14:46 »
Where is that area Geo?
Would be interesting to see who likes your images. Thanking you 712
General Stock Discussion / Re: What's the best time?« on: February 03, 2007, 05:15 »
As I see it 10.10 seems to be standard.
Same for hands on steering when driving!! But we can make our own, maybe you can set a new standard !!! All the best. 713
Dreamstime.com / Re: Made my first sale... Thanks MSG« on: February 03, 2007, 05:09 »
Congrats & Well Done RIver,
You're on your way! Wish you many more. 714
New Sites - General / Keen Images« on: January 29, 2007, 04:42 »
Anybody over there?, and if so what experience.
715
General Stock Discussion / Re: Keyword Generator« on: January 01, 2007, 16:51 »
Have clicked into LEXFN, looks handy and will keep it handy!
Thanks 716
Featurepics.com / Re: Anyone selling at Featurepics?« on: December 28, 2006, 14:29 »
Have sold 2 there since joining in late October with a portfolio of 62.
The good commission makes up for number of sales. 717
Featurepics.com / Re: FeaturePics.com« on: December 14, 2006, 03:57 »
2 sales in 2 months
Commisions put revenue ahead of others. 718
Dreamstime.com / Re: Avoiding Rejection« on: December 13, 2006, 04:20 »
Thanks for all feedback and advice
719
ImageVortex.com / Re: Is IV freezing?« on: December 13, 2006, 04:18 »
I was there for a while with lots of views and no sales.
Withrew pics 720
General Stock Discussion / Re: Hello! And a few questions ;-)« on: December 12, 2006, 06:26 »
How about Featurepics, good on acceptance and commision
721
Dreamstime.com / Avoiding Rejection« on: December 12, 2006, 06:16 »
I'm finding DT really tough on acceptance- any advice?
722
General - Top Sites / Re: Big White Box review time« on: December 04, 2006, 04:18 »
Yeah, doesn't look very good or inspiring.
Won't upload any more for now. Thanks for replying. All the best 723
General - Top Sites / Big White Box review time« on: December 03, 2006, 17:24 »
It seems pretty slow there to say the least.
Anyone experiencing? 724
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime rejections« on: November 29, 2006, 04:16 »
I am only a small fish on DT and finding it tough going with high rejects.
Have a few up already and will keep going. I suppose it's a learning process- albeit a tough one!! Good luck with your subs. 725
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Using TIFF & Saving to JPEG« on: November 28, 2006, 14:34 »
Thanks very much for that.
|
|