MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - cobalt
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 211
76
« on: May 05, 2025, 15:21 »
The very abrupt change to random ai reviews is a very serious problem and I have never seen anything like it in 20 years of doing stock.
So complaining about abrupt changes with no real communication or feedback is perfectly sensible.
Also the only way to make them understand that we are displeased and this is not an acceptable situation.
So keep complaining, nothing about these abrupt roulette reviews is normal.
77
« on: May 05, 2025, 09:38 »
low sales, but moving up. pos 4950
today i had two ai videos reviewed after 30 days. one accepted, one declined for quality.
fair enough, both come from my first ai video batch in jan 2024. and a quality decline means i can reprocess, perhaps it would be enough to make it hd.
curious about the next ai videos and also camera videos now in the queue.
78
« on: May 05, 2025, 04:50 »
raul only post stuff and run lol. and his job is to make good contact with contributors.
agreed. Raul might even be AI bot
Also what happened to Michelle, she was fantastically helpful and seems to have disappeared from discord. I like Raul a lot, but I understand that he must be very frustrated. With random reviews, you can no longer advise creators, or look for problems in a file. If acceptance suddenly goes from 90% to 10% but you do a search by newest and see all kinds of crap coming in, there is nothing you can say. He cannot complain in public about Adobe, but he what is happening is wrong. Surprised he is still there. The community is spiraling downwards and adobe is telling them it is all their fault. I would also interpret lack of adobe mods engagement as a bad sign that worse things are coming. They have doubled down that creators are at fault. They are perfectly fine with an unhappy creator community, which I find very weird. A simple stern upload limit would have easily stopped uploading mass duplicates and in combo with normal quality reviews, most problems would have been solved.
79
« on: May 04, 2025, 15:24 »
Then there is no money for advertising, a sales team, a legal team, an editor team. Running after customers costs a lot of money.
There are many platforms where you can pay to host your content. But then there is no quality moderation, nobody reads releases or checks for copyright problems.
Customers don't like to buy on these sites.
You can always try to run your own webshop from your website. Often in addition to agencies. It works for some, but many give up because dealing with all the questions customers have is a time waste.
There is a huge machine behind the shop window surface. Many creators underestimate how hard agencies have to work.
80
« on: May 04, 2025, 03:16 »
Moved up a bit on ultralow sales. pos 5180
@pacesetter
Thank you for sharing your video results. Always important to remember the power of videos.
81
« on: May 01, 2025, 03:01 »
Customers follow the upload flows. That is how SS kept losing clients
They kept buying agencies but refused to heal their brutal break up with the creator community.
So creators who are often designers buy elsewhere.
Dreamstime has always been good to us, the only agency that paid out more to creators during the pandemic.
They also dont randomly block accounts and their support always writes back quickly.
And now that Adobe is randomly declining content, Dreamstime has always been much better variety to offer especially for ai content.
I think many will replace buying from Adobe with a combo of istock and dreamstime.
istock has more model released people anyway and Dreamstime will have more ai selection.
Creators determine where customers buy or were they buy for their clients.
It will also affect Adobe subscriptions.
Why use the software of a company that gaskights creators and looks down on them?
Affinity photo is always there.
82
« on: May 01, 2025, 01:06 »
Very depressing news.
Adobe has made it official that they prefer the ai spammers.
They have removed the upload limits, so you can read people boasting how they upload 20k files a week to Adobe.
At the same time they are now using a random roulette review algo that is declining files with no logic.
Also affecting many ports with no ai, who only upload camera content.
They could have implemented simple upload limits, instead prefer the spammers.
I will now focus more on camera video and camera photo and also more on other agencies.
This is certainly an opportunity for istock to win creators back.
They still have a normal human review and sensible quality control.
83
« on: April 29, 2025, 14:54 »
now down to 5000
84
« on: April 28, 2025, 08:40 »
pos 4740
going down fast
this is the result of not being able to upload fresh content. it will get worse if i cannot learn how to get content accepted again.
85
« on: April 27, 2025, 04:11 »
pos 6680
86
« on: April 27, 2025, 01:13 »
So, easter is over, all the way down I go. pos 3760
This is also the beginning of the upload chaos on adobe. If I cannot add files and grow my port I am invisible in the newest search.
87
« on: April 25, 2025, 14:06 »
There might be millions of files, but very few come from experienced producers that specialize in holiday content. That is why you keep reading of people saying they uploaded 800 holiday files and had zero sales or less than 5.
There is a lot to learn about various holidays and very different groups.
Country specific
for adults or for children
for corporate conservative events or for creative small business
modest background with lots of copy space or in your face loud and dramatic
for the season sales
for a specific business group - christmas for surfers, easter for hospitals, halloween for a bakery, thanksgiving for dog stylists...
etc...
There really are a lot of details, plus yearly new trends.
In the old days I used to go to a very large trade show in Frankfurt in Germany. Called christmasworld, always in January.
Gigantic place where shops start ordering holiday decoration for the next year.
And there is always a yearly trend - rock gothic black xmas decor with shiny crystals, all natural minimalist cotton/hemp with rustic farmstyle elements, fairytale winter wonderland classic, current movie specials barbieland christmas, supermanchristmas, game of thrones christmas...
Obviously you cannot include superman or the mouse, but you can go for an overall vibe and feel that is trendy
Most people who do holidays, just sort the search by downloads and copy the first 3 pages
But there is so much more.
And every holiday event has gigantic subgenres you can explore.
Even easter is more than bunnies and eggs.
The regular greeting card buyers know these trends. And if they look at your port they immediately see if you specialize in holiday content or just do copies of copies...
88
« on: April 23, 2025, 21:19 »
Look at it this way: winter holiday content uploaded now has a lot less competition.
And the buyers looking now are the really interesting ones, that might also have a bigger enterprise budget or perhaps would buy with an extended license.
6 weeks before the event there is a lot more competition and it is hard to be seen.
89
« on: April 23, 2025, 21:15 »
The random reviews are affecting people with camera content and no ai as well.
Creators have long proposed that Adobe should add sensible upload limits, but instead they removed the 3k limit.
The situation is very demoralising.
If you do a search for any subject and look at newest you see all kinds of crap being accepted, including large batches with 50+ near identical files.
So why are our files declined as similar?
There is no improvement in the quality accepted and especially if I do a search for fresh people content, the quality and choice has gone down.
Nobody benefits from an algo roulette review. Least of all the customers.
I did a test with 3 boring files, one ai illustration that will never become a bestseller. Still cute and usable but a design that is hardly needed. A very simple ai photo with copy space that probably has lots of similars in the collection, but is a genre I usually don't have in my port. And one very simple camera food image.
All 3 were accepted over several days.
Will now again try with maybe 5 mixed files, including some camera stuff.
When I look at what is accepted, I would say there is a bit of a shift to the more boring B roll images with lower sales value.
Less content coming where I would say that might get bought 100 times in the first year.
Perhaps the algo prefers this content because creators usually produce files they hope will sell well. And thus declines files that are more useful.
But in the end I am just guessing.
The algo ai simply does not work and has zero intelligence in the choices it makes.
90
« on: April 23, 2025, 03:13 »
Glad to hear your strategy is working.
But I see no difference in decline complaints between camera and ai.
I did a test with an ugly and probably unsellable ai easter illustration. That was accepted in 2 days.
Now I will try other more ugly content to see if it can get through.
My camera images are still in review, so are my test videos.
91
« on: April 22, 2025, 17:52 »
steady drip starting 6-9 months before.
you might get most of the actual downloads in the holiday season, but the decisions are often made several months in advance.
there are some last minute buyers, but anything you expect to have over 100 dl or over 1000 should be uploaded many, many months earlier
if you are new to holiday images, it can also take several seasons before you get regular buyers. there is a lot of competition and on some agencies it took me at least 3 seasons, before holiday images became regular and good sellers.
92
« on: April 22, 2025, 12:43 »
Thanks for giving me a little hope about illustrative editorial.
93
« on: April 22, 2025, 09:34 »
@halffull
I am asking because also the camera producers photo/video are reporting random declines of entire batches for similar or quality. They have been uploading for years with 90% acceptance rate. So now they have stopped uploading.
Somebody is suggesting to do editorial photos. Might try that.
But i am really worried about the rest of the year. If I don't get holiday christmas content into my port now the rest of the year will be a disaster.
I feel like I have been barred from uploading of any content type.
I will try editorial, but that is not a reliable market.
94
« on: April 22, 2025, 04:58 »
Congratulations!!
Are your acceptance rates normal?
Or are you subjected to the russian roulette declines as well?
I hope they make an exception for those higher up in rank.
95
« on: April 22, 2025, 03:22 »
Have you tried uploading camera content? Or camera videos? Illustrative editorial?
I really need the money, but my business plan for 2025 did not include Adobe using a russian roulette ai for reviews.
96
« on: April 21, 2025, 10:58 »
Sounds like a good strategy.
I took some time off and started my blog project for something outside of stock.
This week I will finally process videos and every day I will also upload a tiny amount of images, camera and ai to adobe to test the waters.
My biggest concern is the holiday season, especially xmas.
I must upload now to get good returns, but I am worried that it all gets declined because the images always have a lot of copy space.
I feel like I am being punished for having experience.
Adobe is my favorite agency and I could have certainly had a much better season if I had been allowed to work normally.
97
« on: April 21, 2025, 08:42 »
Question is if AI takes over and artists, creatives, bloggers etc are no longer seeing financial reward, or very little reward why would anyone upload anything of value to the internet. AI companies must have thought this one through, do they really think people are just going to work for free or something.
Sorry to be harsh but they sound like a self entitled bunch, lobbying governments, at least here in Britain, to weaken copyright laws. Our silly governments are swallowing the line.
people were saying the same when the free agencies came out...and here we are still making money. we sell time more than actual files. that includes saving time on prompting. spend an afternoon prompting or 20 min browsing thousands of files, then tweaking the ones you find in photoshop to perfection
98
« on: April 21, 2025, 03:36 »
In quiet times you can move up
pos 1180
99
« on: April 21, 2025, 02:50 »
Wasn't envato the favorite place for videos. And difficult to get into?
Like storyblocks?
100
« on: April 21, 2025, 02:34 »
"Simple fix, completely separate real images from AI. Different website, different search engine, different review stream. This is better for contributors and customers. "
This is not better for buyers, I don't want to waste time checking two websites.
In a combined search I can easily pick the best from all media.
If I don't want ai, i just exclude it with one click.
If Adobe had normal upload limits, 1200-2000 a month, they can always offer exceptions to talented producers. And someone wanting to upload 20k files could just write to support for an exception.
However uploading 20k at once, will usually lead to low sales results.
We have practical proof when people left istock exclusivity in 2013.
Those that uploaded gradually and mixed old and new files and created an upload stream made more and more reliable money than those who dropped 20k files in one go.
The success of our ports comes from gradually being discovered and followed by buyers.
Dumping it all at once with little follow up is useless.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 211
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|