MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Freezingpictures

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 ... 45
751
Albumo.com / Re: New Stock site
« on: June 29, 2007, 05:50 »
Yeah I agree, the site is better then I first thought. I just started to upload image on there. Hope to reach the 1000 before the 100 club is full..

752
Dreamstime.com / Re: Exclusive images...
« on: June 29, 2007, 01:58 »
I have a few exclusive images, the extra 10% is nice, but they do not seem to be favoured in the search engine, however, they are not my best images, maybe that is why they are not selling so well..

753
SnapVillage.com / Re: Ohhhh...ahhhh...Corbis.
« on: June 25, 2007, 12:23 »
Thanks for the info Lee,

why don't you invite that corbis guy to come to this forum, he will get a lot of valueable suggestions :-)

754
SnapVillage.com / Re: Ohhhh...ahhhh...Corbis.
« on: June 25, 2007, 08:14 »
Hmm,

I start to like this site, and one reason is the prices and second, in fact, you do not need to keyword your files, they do it for you! But you are allowed to.


And I found this in the FAQ:

"Can I create my own titles & keywords?
Sure! Youre welcome to upload titles and keywords, but you dont have to. We know that most of our photographers would rather be out taking pictures than sitting in front of a computer filing out forms so we are willing to do the work for you."

If every agency would do that.. we really would have more time for photography...
Massuploading will be available soon too aparently.

I also found a blog of them:
http://blog.snapvillage.com/

755
SnapVillage.com / Re: Ohhhh...ahhhh...Corbis.
« on: June 25, 2007, 04:59 »
I understood that for now it is only for the US, but I think they will change it in future

756
SnapVillage.com / Re: Ohhhh...ahhhh...Corbis.
« on: June 25, 2007, 03:16 »
My mistake haven't seen the note. Images didn't came through, because at least one side has to have 2100 Pixels. I had 2000 X 2000

757
SnapVillage.com / Re: Ohhhh...ahhhh...Corbis.
« on: June 25, 2007, 02:57 »
I uploaded some pics too, half of them didn't came through for whatever reason...

758
General Stock Discussion / Re: Image Processing Question
« on: June 23, 2007, 13:05 »
Lately I am spending more time per image. Between 10 min and 30 min.
But it also depends on the image. On some I spend just two min. On two other images  I spend about 7 hours this week.

And if its perfect, low ISO, right exposure, no isolation,cloning etc, than its perfect and I spend about two minutes typing in the keywords and the description :-)


759
Albumo.com / Re: New Stock site
« on: June 22, 2007, 16:13 »
I received an invite as well - they offered to pay me $250 if I uploaded 1000 images (to be a member of their "elite 100 club"). I briefly checked it out - looks to me to be far too early to make it worth my time to join: apart from a few of anomalies, their top selling images have been DLed only once!

... still, I'm tempted by the $250. I'm suspicious that they'll become inordinately picky about accepting images once people near the 1000 mark, so I'll pass on this for now.

Here's the link for those curious about it.


I understand it this way: you upload a 1000 images and then you are in the club. After that for every image you upload you get 10 cents. In this way cou can earn max $250. But that also means you have to upload 2500 images in addition to the 1000, equals 3500 images.


Well thats a step in the right direction for an agency to start, but for me the deal is not good enaugh yet..

760
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 21, 2007, 16:25 »
No I wasn't implying for all photographers who are at the bronze level. Maybe conclusion was not the right word. Impression might be better. I just wanted to summarize it.

761
Sales are still kind of modest. I just have reached 16 all time dls, BUT I got my first EL today  ;D $25.
So I guess it was allready worth the work uploading to LO :)

762
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 21, 2007, 01:23 »
One person could only submit once to one poll, they somehow managed this with the IP address. But yes, a person could submit to both exclusive and non-exclusive. And there were two or three really unusual votes in the non-exclusive part. But so many votes were taken in the non exclusive poll, I doubt it overall made a big difference.

Sorry, I had to edit the exclusive poll results at the question where the photographers sold their images before they became exclusive. I just discovered the mistake looking again at the results.
 There is one exclusive photographer who joined exclusivity programm when he was Bronze and sold his images on 4 other agencies before. You cannot read this data in what I provided here, but exactly this photographer is one of the two photographers who reported a decrease in earnings after he went exclusive.

Although the poll was not taken by too many exclusive photographers, my impression out of this is, that it generally is not worthy regarding the earnings if you get exclusive at the Bronze level.
There might be exceptions. If you are one of the few Bronze photographers who earns 65-80% upwards on Istockphoto, you might increase your earnings by turning exclusive.
Another photographer who turned exclusive at the Bronze level had 65-80% of his total income on Istockphoto before he joined the exclusivity program. His total earnings increased  30-40% after he became exclusive.
However the other photographer allready mentioned who sold his images at 4 other agencies and had a decrease of total earnings, reported also that before he became exclusive, istock earned him 65-80% of his total income.

All the other photographers who turned exclusive at the Bronze level and had 80-100% of their income allready before they became exclusive, reported an increase of earnings except one. Coincidentely, all those photographers have been just on one or none of the big 6 microstock agency.

Conclusion: for the majority of photographers it is not worthy if you just look at the income to turn exclusive at the bronze level.

763
New Sites - General / Re: The Photo Storage
« on: June 20, 2007, 22:11 »
I received that invitation too, and I registered with them, but I will not upload, as long as this site is so small and and has nothing really good to offer. It is not very promising in my opinion. It offers less percentage than DT, StockXpert and in futur even less than Ft.
I allways compare these new sites with how FT started. Ft was very serious you could see that, they offered photographers credits just for uploading. 20 cents for an accepted image for a month or two.
It is even hard for LO to get into the market, who seems to be pretty serious and investing. Why should I then join this agency?

764
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 20, 2007, 13:27 »
And here part two:

The poll for non exclusive photographers:

Question: How high is the amount you earn on Istockphoto as a percentage of your total income on microstock?

Base photographers (28)

6 answered: less than 15%
11 answered: 15-25%
4 answered: 25-35%
4 answered: 35-45%
1 answered: 45-55%
1 answered: 55-65%
1 answered: 80-100%

Bronze photographers (41):

5 answered: less than 15%
5 answered: 15-25%
8 answered: 25-35%
11 answered: 35-45%
6 answered: 45-55%
2 answered: 55-65%
2 answered: 65-80%
2 answered: 80-100%

Silver photographers (19):

1 answered: less than 15%
2 answered: 15-25%
7 answered: 25-35%
6 answered: 35-45%
1 answered: 45-55%
1 answered: 55-65%
1 answered: 65-80%

Gold photographers (10)

1 answered: 15-25%
5 answered: 25-35%
3 answered: 35-45%
1 answered: 45-55%

Diamond photographers (2)

1 answered: less than 15%
1 answered: 35-45%


Question: On which agencies are you selling your images? (Options were: Dreamstime,Shutterstock, Fotolia, Stockxpert, Bigstockphoto)

Base photographers (28)

1 answered: no response
1 answered: SS
1 answered: SS,DT
1 answered: SS,FT
1 answered: DT,BS
1 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert
5 answered: SS,DT,FT,StockXpert
3 answered: SS,DT,FT,BS
14 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert,FT,BS

Bronze photographers (41):

2 answered: no response
1 answered: StockXpert
1 answered: SS,FT
1 answered: SS,DT,BS
1 answered: SS,DT,FT
3 answered: SS,DT,FT,StockXpert
6 answered: SS,DT,FT,BS
1 answered: DT,FT,StockXpert,BS
25 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert,FT,BS

Silver photographers (19):

1 answered: SS,DT
1 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert
2 answered: SS,DT,FT
1 answered: SS,DT,FT,StockXpert
2 answered: SS,DT,FT,BS
12 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert,FT,BS

Gold photographers (10)

2 answered: SS,DT,FT,StockXpert
8 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert,FT,BS

Diamond photographers (2)

2 answered: SS,DT,StockXpert,FT,BS

Question: How many images do you upload to Istockphoto every week on average?

Base photographers (28)

17 answered: less than 10
11 answered: 10-20

Bronze photographers (41):

29 answered: less than 10
12 answered: 10-20

Silver photographers (19):

14 answered: less than 10
3 answered: 10-20
1 answered: 20-30
1 answered: 40-50

Gold photographers (10)

4 answered: less than 10
2 answered: 10-20
3 answered: 20-30
1 answered: 30-40

Diamond photographers (2)

1 answered: 10-20
1 answered: 20-30


Question: Would you upload more if you were not restricted by the upload limit? If yes, how many would you upload on average per week?

Base photographers (28)

14 answered: No
8 answered: 20-30
1 answered: 30-40
3 answered: 40-50
1 answered: 50-75
1 answered: 150-200

Bronze photographers (41):

30 answered: No
4 answered: 20-30
5 answered: 30-40
3 answered: 40-50
1 answered: 50-75
1 answered: 100-150

Silver photographers (19):

12 answered: No
2 answered: 20-30
1 answered: 40-50
1 answered: 50-75

Gold photographers (10)

8 answered: No
1 answered: 30-40
1 answered: 50-75

Diamond photographers (2)

1 answered: No
1 answered: 30-40

Question: Would you consider going exclusively to Istockphoto? If yes, at which canister level?

Base photographers (28)

12 answered: No never!
12 answered: I do not know
2 answered: Yes, Bronze
1 answered: Yes, Gold
1 answered: Yes, Diamond

Bronze photographers (41):

23 answered: No never!
7 answered: I do not know
4 answered: Yes, Silver
3 answered: Yes, Gold
3 answered: Yes, Diamond
1 answered: Yes, Black Diamond

Silver photographers (19):

8 answered: No never!
5 answered: I do not know
2 answered: Yes, Gold
4 answered: Yes, Diamond

Gold photographers (10)

4 answered: No never!
2 answered: I do not know
3 answered: Yes, Diamond
1 answered: Yes, Black Diamond

Diamond photographers (2)

1 answered: No never
1 answered: I do not know

Probably I will write an analysis on my website some day, right know I am too busy for that..

765
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 20, 2007, 11:47 »
Thank you!

Here is the first part of the survey. The results of the poll, which the exclusive photographers filled out.
I just had 14 filled out this part. The poll is still open, I will update the survey, if some more people will fill it out.

The photographers are sorted by their canister color which they had at the time they became exclusive.

Exclusives

Question: How high was the amount you earned on Istockphoto as a percentage of your total income on microstock before you became exclusive?

Bronze photographers (10):

7 answered: 80-100%
2 answered: 65-80%
1 answered: no respons

Silver photographers (3):

1 answered: 80-100%
1 answered: 65-80%
1 answered: 55-65%

Gold photographers (1)

1 answered: 80-100%

Question: What was your increase in earnings on microstock the 30 days after you became exclusive, compared to the 30 days before you became exclusive?

Bronze photographers (10)

2 answered: decrease in earnings
1 answered: 10-20%
4 answered: 20-30%
3 answered: 30-40%

Silver photographers (3)

1 answered: 10-20%
1 answered: 30-40%
1 answered: 50-60%

Gold photographers (1)

1 answered: 40-50%

Question: On which of the following agencies did you sell your photos before becoming exclusive at Istockphoto?

Bronze photographers (10)

5 answered: no response
1 answered: other
1 answered: Dreamstime, Shutterstock, Fotolia, Bigstockphoto
1 answered: Bigstockphoto
1 answered: Dreamstime
1 answered: Shutterstock

Silver photographers (3)

1 answered: no response
1 answered: shutterstock, dreamstime, fotolia, stockxpert, bigstockphoto
1 answered: shutterstock, dreamstime, fotolia, stockxpert, bigstockphoto, other

Gold photographers (1)

1 answered: Dreamstime

Question: How many images do you upload to Istockphoto on average per week?
 
Bronze photographers (10)

7 answered: less than 10 Images
2 answered: 10-20 Images
1 answered: 20-30 Images

Silver photographers (3)

2 answered: less than 10 Images
1 answered: 10-20 Images

Gold photographers (1)

1 answered: less than 10

Question: Are you happy with your decision of becoming exclusive?

Every photographer is happy with the decision, except 4 Bronze photographers, who do not know if they are happy or not.

(Was edited, discovered a mistake at the results on question where they sold the images before they got exclusive)

767
Dreamstime.com / Promotion website
« on: June 20, 2007, 02:34 »
A guy set up a promotion website, so if you have images on DT you can sign up and promote 8 images. I think it is a good idea. Here is the thread in the DT forum: http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_7716
and here his website: http://www.promotographer.com/

768
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock increased sales?
« on: June 20, 2007, 02:00 »
My sales are down too at SS. At IS my sales continue to be down  a second month in a row. Maybe slightly better than May, I do not know yet.

769
I downsize usually for SS, because there it gets most likely to get rejected because of lack of focus. At the other agency I sometimes downsize, if the quality of the image is not so good. My most used lense is not very good.

770
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 18, 2007, 01:41 »
You are not allowed to sell your images royalty free anywhere except getty. You are not even allowed to give your images away for free. But if that image is Rights-Managed you can sell, or if it is work for hire by that magazine.

The non-exclusive poll is completed! 100 photographers filled it out! (The poll is limited to 100, if you only have a free account on sureveymonkey)
Thank you so much!
The exclusive part is at 11 photographers. Thats not too much, but may tell us a bit. I will try to give you the results this week. So exclusives please continue filling out the poll :)

771
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 15, 2007, 15:10 »
Thanks again and thank you for the suggestions about where to get some more exclusives to take part in the poll. Just an update: up to now I have 73 non-exclusives and 9 exclusives who filled out the poll.

I asked at Istockphoto, they do not allow me to ask in the forum or sitemail people.
I posted in Yahoo groups and got some responses allready. Lets hope to get some more exclusive to take part in the poll, their answers are probably the most interesting.

Here already some information ahead of time I myself am quite surprised. From the non exclusive photographers almost 25% do think about signing up at IS for exclusivity one time in the future.

And 68% would not upload more if there was an higher upload limit.


772
Penguins and business people ;)
Go to Istockphoto for example and click on most popular files.

773
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia V.2
« on: June 15, 2007, 03:55 »
Maybe it takes 5 days and they want to be ready on Monday..
From my view it is better sooner then later. They allready took so long...

774
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Big problems...
« on: June 13, 2007, 15:09 »
The good news is that my sales don't seem to have been affected by the latest change.  The bad news is they are down overall now that exclusives are once again getting preferential placement, and I had my first zero DL day in nine months on Sunday.   >:(   

What makes you think that exclusives are getting preferential placement?
I'm not exclusive and my placement in the searches is much better than it was before the re-shuffle and my downloads have gone right up.  I have lots of my best sellers that were lost for the last couple of months back up and selling and turning up on the first and second pages of searches.

Yes I agree with fotografer, the last two days were really good and my bestseller started again to sell after several of weeks of very slow sales. In fact, today seems to be one of my best days I had on IS without counting ELs.

775
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock poll about Exclusivity
« on: June 13, 2007, 15:01 »
Great! Thank you! I've got allready 14 for non exclusive. But only one for the exclusive photographers. I hope some more exclusive photographers would vote to get some more data. I hope to get up to a hundred votes for each poll,so keep going :), however I am not sure from where to get all the exclusive photographers... 

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 ... 45

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors