MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - SuperPhoto
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 47
926
« on: February 12, 2019, 11:29 »
Hi Matt,
Okay, just found out it does "not" work.
Could you please submit this as a feature request, specifically:
a) If I upload a .csv file, it will apply new keyword orders/etc to "approved" files, in addition to title changes, etc?
It should be extremely easy to implement programatically.
I wish I had known that keyword order was important - because for hundreds of files I have an 'identical' set of keywords for the first 4-5 keywords - and then it varies after that. Simply because I was 'classifying' my work, but it not necessarily what would be most searched/important/etc.
It would be extremely painful to have to 'manually' drag/drop several thousand files, i.e., it would be like 40-50 hours of "work" just re-arranging keywords for something that may or may not result in any additional sales.
Thanks.
927
« on: February 11, 2019, 13:11 »
Hi -
If you have sold anything at envato over the last few years, and either have a withholding tax applied to your sales, or didn't fill in their tax form - you might want to double check that you haven't been doubletaxed. You could be owed a lot of back money from envato, because there are accounts that have been doubletaxed.
Taxes are "supposed" to be calculated on the "net" amount paid out to you. Instead, for some of these accounts, envato has been calculating taxes on the 'gross' amount after they take their commission, which could be meaning you are owed a lot of back money from them.
I.e., for simplicity, let's say you have a $100 item, and (for illustration) say envato's commission was 50% (with their $3). And let's use the 30% withholding tax rate that was used for several years with with no tax form/tax treaty/etc.
Proper calculation:
$100 net sale - $3 commission - $100 * 50% commission - (net amount of sale: $100-$3-$50 = $47 * 30% =) $14.1 withholding tax
= $100 - $3 - $50 - $14.1 = $32.90 payable to you.
What envato has been doing for some accounts:
$100 net sale - $3 commission - $100 * 50% commission - (gross amount of sale: $100 * 30% =) $30 withholding tax
= $100 - $3 - $50 - $30 = $17 that "was" paid to you (so envato still owes you $15.90, but instead kept it for themselves).
(i.e., if hypothetically envato took a 100% commission - then they would actually be telling you 'owe' them money for each sale generated, i.e., $100 - $3 - $100 (100%) - $100 * 30% = -$33 - i.e., $33 they would say 'you' owe them in taxes, and they would never pay you anything).
They have been incorrectly calculating the withholding tax over a long time for some accounts, so you could actually be owed a lot of money. You should doublecheck to make sure you haven't been doubletaxed, and if you have, you should contact them to make sure you are paid any back money.
Hope that helps some people here.
928
« on: February 11, 2019, 12:55 »
hi Mat - okay,
If I update my keywords using a .csv file for already approved files, will it then update my list? (As opposed to me manually having to go image by image, etc?)
Thanks!
929
« on: February 10, 2019, 23:48 »
How important are 'organizing' your keywords in adobestock for ranking? I didn't realize it seems they have an "order" of keywords (if you have them listed alphabetically, you'll actually get a warning message asking if you really meant for them to be alphabetical).
How much difference does it make to get a sale?
930
« on: January 18, 2019, 09:11 »
Also - reading your notes - you are "lucky" in a way that you already have an established clientelle.
If you have clients "looking" for your work - then yes - it makes sense for you to direct them to your website. You'll take more home.
It would have been better to develop a one-time payment wordpress plugin as opposed to shopify. I know the recurring income is 'nice' - but again - getting people to buy it/use it is an entirely different thing. Plus - you have more control of your data - whereas there are some issues with using shopify as an intermediary. Also - there are already a lot of 'photo' wordpress templates readily available, for $25-$50 as a 'one-time' fee (as opposed to $25/MONTH), which are also a *lot* easier to set up than shopify's interface.
I would make an educated guess that most of the stock photographers here not only have never seen the inside of a studio (or even ever owned one) - but simply work from home. I believe most don't have an established clientelle familiar with their work.
Good luck though, but I believe you have your work cut out for you.
931
« on: January 18, 2019, 09:05 »
As I had mentioned a long time ago (figured I knew where you were going with this, I was pretty accurate)... most stock photographers/videographers don't really care about "uploading" their content, they care about *sales*.
If you can figure out how to make more *sales* (more specifically - a "healthy profit" after paying expenses) - then you'll have a winner.
But shopify - to do anything "reasonable" - is actually a *very* expensive platform. Once you start using their plugins/addons/etc - you'll be looking at paying at least $200-$250 USD/month, if not more.
If you can't show how a stock photographer is going to start making that (I'd say at least $500/month - to compensate for the time in setting it up/etc) - you'll have a difficult time selling it.
It looks 'nice' - but profit is what matters.
932
« on: January 17, 2019, 16:04 »
---------------------
933
« on: December 04, 2018, 08:39 »
Seen so many of these threads, figured I may as well start one  Apparently some "good news" from Alamy everyone should be happy about! Commissions going from 50% to 40%! YAY! Comment below.
934
« on: November 16, 2018, 16:55 »
He may actually be licensed to do that... depends what kind of license for the images he purchased - because technically this would be a 'derivative' work (as opposed to 'outright' selling the images/prints)... so - he "may" actually be "allowed" to do that...
In which case, seems very smart. Not really the best deal for the photographer/someone who only gets say $0.25 for their image - BUT - if he is licensed to do so, then he is licensed to do so (because that may be what you are agreeing to)... I'd check to see if the license does cover 'derivative' works...
935
« on: November 14, 2018, 11:20 »
congratulations!
936
« on: November 13, 2018, 10:24 »
How much did you expect to make prior to uploading those images?
Actually, I had no idea. For me, it was more a test. With all the 'doom & gloom' posts here, and the fact there are lots of 'spam' portfolios on shutterstock - AND - the fact there is just a lot of competition period, I wasn't sure if I was going to make anything, or how long it would take... So - I just wanted to try a small test batch, to see if I got anything... I've only had that batch uploaded to shutterstock for maybe a week - and it was nice to see a sale, even though it was rather small. But it was just 'cool' that I did get a sale... Now, of course - if I can upload say 10000 images, etc - and see similar if not better results, then to me, that is encouraging... but of course - there is the time aspect of things (figuring out how to do it intelligently to maximize revenue, etc)... But for me - it's still just pretty cool that I got a sale for an image I took...
937
« on: November 12, 2018, 23:08 »
I know it might not seem like much (since I've mainly focused on videos). But, recently decided to upload some of my images as well. Currently I have a HUGE image portfolio of a grand whopping total of about 50 images  Which, probably only took me about 20 hours to curate, edit, keyword, etc... so (at the moment) my 'effective' salary for images is about $0.02/hour... BUT... it's still pretty cool the idea of having made a sale from an image I took! (I suppose I am thinking the 'super' amazing thing is that... with the "2 million images uploaded" this week thing from shutterstock, mine happened to be one of the ones that was purchased (via subscription). And I didn't have to upload 50,000 variations of the same thing to get that...! Now I just need to figure out how to multiply that number by about 1,000,000 per month... and I'll be set!
938
« on: November 08, 2018, 11:01 »
Actually - this is one of the few "great news" that - might not be all that bad.
If you read carefully - they are talking about offering "low res" videos at reduced prices, i.e., basically saying from their tests - they acquired brand new buyers that wanted 'low res' videos that would have not otherwise purchased.
Offering a 720p or lower quality video at a reduced price seems reasonable to me, because if you were a 'casual' youtuber (not necessarily making mega bucks, but wanted a 'nice' video) - you might be reluctant to pay $100 for a single video.
But as long as it is "new" buyers - doesn't canabalize existing sales - then I think this is good...
939
« on: November 04, 2018, 17:11 »
Thanks for writing/sharing the post!
940
« on: November 03, 2018, 10:42 »
Look at how much you currently make per year on that image. If it is close to $0/year - then yes, go for it.
Curious - what image is it? (If you want to PM me, thats okay too - just very curious what they would pay $1500 for).
Cheers!
941
« on: November 01, 2018, 13:31 »
$0 is my lowest.
If I am *only* talking about videography (because I haven't really done photography nor yet have any photo sales), then combined I think "maybe" $700. (But that is with a portfolio of about 4,000+).
Been doing this about a year, so I consider that pretty low giving all the time/effort/etc I've put into it. (I figure I've worked about the equivalent of about $0.50/hour for my sales to date for video). Of course I'd like to make a lot more, but to some degree I have been doing this just for fun as well.
"Good" video is a lot harder than good photography, simply because in addition to keywording/titling/good lighting/good subject/subject matter/etc - you have to do things like edit the video, if moving (which is almost always), stabilized, good resolution (no artifacts), convert for various platforms, cropped/editing/re-exporting the video (time consuming), etc, etc.
Plus, seems everyone & their dog is doing video (shutterstock boasts 150,000 *new* videos added *every* week)... so, competition is fairly stiff.
942
« on: November 01, 2018, 01:22 »
I've read a few people say the poll on the right isn't really represenative of what is 'good' nowadays.
What do you recommend for video? I'm assuming obviously Pond5, Shutterstock, Adobe, & Videoblocks... Envato if you can get on the "good" side of a reviewer who doesn't view you as competition and just reject all your submissions... Any others?
943
« on: November 01, 2018, 01:20 »
hi -
From reading that article - it actually just looks like an automated form letter. Chances are it was written once, and sent to 100's (or 1000's) of artists. I get those 'types' of letters for other stuff I do - just simply because they scraped an e-mail address they found.
As for breaking "in" - you actually "don't" need millions of dollars to start a successful company or 'break into' microstock. You need a unique angle that gets you attention and sales.
944
« on: October 28, 2018, 20:44 »
I agree that the rejection rate seems 'relatively' high.
While yes - I do agree with some of the comments (on why certain videos were rejected) - others do just seem to be 'randomly' rejected.
945
« on: October 28, 2018, 03:50 »
Don't worry about it.
Each agency accepts/rejects different things, and not much you can do about it.
You'll probably have stuff that gets rejected on Pond5, but accepted on SS.
If you get worried about it, you'll drive yourself nuts.
946
« on: October 27, 2018, 09:31 »
words of wisdom for SS: 'If you paint a piece of dog crap with gold paint it still is dog crap'
BUT! it's in GOLD PAINT!!! don't forget that!
947
« on: October 27, 2018, 09:10 »
From the sounds of it...
Sounds like you probably tried submitting someone else's content and passing it off as your own, hoping you wouldn't get "caught". Since you did - you are pretending that if you feign innocence, "they" won't know. "They" actually do have brains.
So if you stole someone elses content, fudged/"edited" the passport photo, spammed their database, then yes, they would ban your account.
You could try continue making multiple accounts - but most likely you would do something foolish, and get those banned too.
Don't steal other people's stuff and try to pass it off as your own. Don't submit identical stuff to multiple accounts to 'spam' the database with photos with the hopes of making more $$$.
948
« on: October 27, 2018, 09:06 »
The better the equipment, the better chance of being accepted.
Everything is constantly updating.
Several years ago (i.e., 10 years ago) - it was the "norm" to accept 720p (1280x720). And that was considered really 'good', also because that's what a lot of high end digital cameras did.
Now - if you tried submitting that - most likely automatically rejected because its too 'small'.
The spark (although I haven't used it) - is most likely just an "okay" camera. You will get some of the stuff accepted - but like others have said - if it isn't a beautiful bright sunny day - most likely you'll have artifacts (blocky pixellation) - which will get rejected.
So if you want the best chance of getting accepted - right now the mavic 2 pro seems to the best.
949
« on: October 27, 2018, 08:57 »
I think everyone makes this mistake sometime in their career. I have (several times, unfortunately, and a couple times hurt quite a bit). You have to remember you are dealing with people - not computers - and you can't start getting angry/annoyed/etc at some random person. Because then stuff like this can happen. People do make mistakes (in other companies, i.e., alamy), so being polite/considerate - even though you might be steaming - is usually the best way to deal with it. Look, I may have just caught the wrong rep at the wrong time. Has it been James or whoever you guys get, I would have agreed with all the positive rebukes and never made this post in the first place. But, I stand by "petty" and "easily offended" when that is how my direct private experience with them has been. I'm glad to hear many others experience much better than I have. I concede that "vindictive" may not accurate, an astounding coincidence with the timing and scale, but sure, coincidences happen. I retract that, for what it's worth.
"whining", "ego-tripping", "drama". Throwing childish, unprovoked insults at one another probably discourages more agencies as well as contributors from posting on here than agency reps choosing whether or not to defend honest criticism.
950
« on: October 19, 2018, 09:34 »
Alamy is not the only one. Envato is really bad for that, and so are a few others. Unfortunately just sounds like you accidentally stepped in doggy doo doo. You could try apologizing for questioning them. May or may not make a difference. I have been contributing to Alamy for 5 years. Sales increasing year after year. A couple rejections early on while getting used to what they want, but ever since I've had dozens of batches of accepted images, without any further rejections. I was "stuck" at 2 out of 3 threes stars with their "QC" rating, but never thought much of it, other than it seems to take absolute lifetime of perfection to get to maximum 3 stars.
I had put Alamy on the backburner and hadn't uploaded for a bit, but I had some extra time and decided to submit a batch. To the 75 or so images in the batch, I added an image I took of a photo of opportunity taken on an iPhone. This image is available on SS, AB, P5, etc. and sells surprisingly well. Unfortunately, I seem to have forgotten that Alamy does not accept images from iPhones (even though they've accepted images from far worse cameras, but I digress). So that batch, all 75+ images, all of them from DSLR's (besides the one), was blanket rejected. This I can understand, they have a policy, I violated it (even an understandable mistake) and while rejecting the whole batch over one image seems harsh, it's their company, their policy. But that's not where it ends.
They put a 10 day upload freeze on my account. They dropped my QC ranking dropped from 2 to 1 stars. Dozens of perfect batches of uploads, no rank increase. One failed image, dropped to the bottom of their QC rating and an upload freeze. 3 punishments for one little overlooked image. I don't even understand exactly what that means or how it affects my account specifically, but I realized it can't be good and it seemed like some harsh treatment to a good contributor over a simple honest mistake. So I reached out to their support for clarification.
Big mistake.
A robotic and defensive sounding response informing me of their blanket policy of acceptable cameras and that my rank will stay at 1. That it's "not possible" to check every image (tell that to SS, AB, P5, etc.). They offered a "goodwill gesture" of unfreezing my uploads, but I again asked why such a harsh punishment for one image. No further response. I self-imposed an upload "freeze" of my own.
So here we are, months later. Zero sales since the inquiry. I was getting regular, predictably reliable and increasing sales month after month. But since I dared to (politely, mind you) question their over-reaction to my rejected upload, I have somehow offended them and triggered someone there into handicapping my portfolio. Years of being a solid contributor, growing sales, hours and hours of time to conform to their uniquely convoluted key-wording / tagging process. All I get is a big ol' F-U.
Alamy staff is proving to be petty, easily offended and vindictive. I recommend that if you have something potentially negative or critical to say to the about their policies or behavior, that you keep it to yourself. They only represented 5-10% of my income, but it still sucks to "lose" that income over something so juvenile. I'm sure others rely on them more, so watch what you say, fellow contributors.
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 47
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|