|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - gillian vann
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 ... 56
976
« on: January 21, 2013, 16:06 »
I do apologise, I meant no attack. I was just frustrated. Sorry.
977
« on: January 20, 2013, 17:41 »
yes, I saw that she was a he on his iStock portfolio page, but it made no sense to have a female avatar and be asking for first submission advice.
978
« on: January 20, 2013, 15:50 »
seriously! could you have a little respect for what's going on right now? I've got a small port, I'm nobody, and I am outraged. you are being all smiley and cheerful whilst others are deleting their ports and along with it, their livelihoods. we won't make a difference if we don't band together. people like you are the prime reason for why unions (something I detest) are compulsory. I'm sorry, but I can't understand how you can be so insensitive to post this - IN TWO THREADS - at a time like this.
I disagree with your reasoning. Its a business and if someone wants to join IS, they can do that, its a free world. She as a newbie to IS has not gone through the years of hardship at IS. She is just being friendly. What I dont understand is why would someone join a site, with the lowest royalty in the business and giving her images away for free.
you disagree with the notion that we should all stand together? then we are doomed. I'm also a newbie but I can see the bigger picture, rather than just myself. (and if you've looked, her profile does have an istock port, which i don't understand)
979
« on: January 20, 2013, 15:45 »
well shouldn't we all start new threads with this, or similar, questions?
980
« on: January 20, 2013, 06:43 »
seriously! could you have a little respect for what's going on right now? I've got a small port, I'm nobody, and I am outraged. you are being all smiley and cheerful whilst others are deleting their ports and along with it, their livelihoods. we won't make a difference if we don't band together. people like you are the prime reason for why unions (something I detest) are compulsory. I'm sorry, but I can't understand how you can be so insensitive to post this - IN TWO THREADS - at a time like this.
981
« on: January 20, 2013, 06:33 »
it's now the 20th and I've seen nil come through. 
982
« on: January 20, 2013, 05:49 »
i would have thought facebook is far easier, plus easier to share and share and share. not sure i'd bother uploading pics, but those screen shots of "your file has been deactivated" is v powerful.
983
« on: January 19, 2013, 17:25 »
every morning I wake up hoping that while I slept (and the US/Canada was awake) that something significant happened to make this nightmare go away.
*sigh*
984
« on: January 19, 2013, 06:13 »
ah, that is so simple, which is perfect.
985
« on: January 19, 2013, 03:39 »
photographer shooting a model/set up in the foreground, whilst in the bg we see a suited guy handing over something to a goggle t-shirted guy, who's holding a sack of $$?
986
« on: January 19, 2013, 03:35 »
wow! post this to the istock fb wall...? 
988
« on: January 18, 2013, 18:08 »
I like it. If you come into a thread late and want to skim a bit you can easily see the better posts.
I don't think the popular posts are necessarily the best. Sometimes the ones that divide opinion are worth reading and they wont stand out.
also true.
989
« on: January 18, 2013, 17:56 »
do they have someone working round the clock to delete negative posts? surely there must be many?
990
« on: January 18, 2013, 17:00 »
still nothing. my BME at iS and PP is disappointing so far.
i've stopped uploading and will cut my port in Feb, would have liked to have achieved a payout in a month in my first year. ah well.
991
« on: January 18, 2013, 16:43 »
not a fan of the ribbons. aren't we creatives? shouldn't they look modern, not so old-fashioned and cliched (and clip arty)? few awards like this are ribboned nowadays.
I thought SAC was good but now that you've mentioned the slang equivalent (used in australia too, but not by me) is it out?
992
« on: January 18, 2013, 16:35 »
I like it. If you come into a thread late and want to skim a bit you can easily see the better posts.
993
« on: January 18, 2013, 16:09 »
few do - except Sean, I imagine. 
994
« on: January 18, 2013, 04:13 »
You could always give the classic: "It's not me....it's you."
Good one. I alternate among:
"Unsuitable for stock"
"Unsustainable"
"Peebert made me do it"
LCV, esp after you give it to Google.
995
« on: January 17, 2013, 21:30 »
oh dear, I have nil so far, that is disappointing.
996
« on: January 17, 2013, 02:27 »
... but if we don't hear back from you I will be fairly certain it is on advice of counsel, and a lawsuit may be in the works...
I was hoping that Yuri's silence to date meant exactly this.
997
« on: January 16, 2013, 20:11 »
what a wonderful story to share with us, esp during this turbulent time, to remind us that we all started here: with just a desire to capture memories.
998
« on: January 16, 2013, 16:21 »
why does your profile say you already are an iS contributor?
and really, while all this is going on, you want in?
999
« on: January 15, 2013, 19:50 »
i'm sorry I also was under the impression of no people images.
if 123 hadn't pissed everyone off they may have been a better choice.
1000
« on: January 15, 2013, 15:36 »
it's the 16th (for me), usually by now we'd see something come trickling through?
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 ... 56
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
