is anyone else peeved at the huge percentages some ms sites take, I mean 80%!!! For acting as a non exclusive agent this is ridiculous. I figure I've easily paid a full time member of staff's wages at IS this year. There's no way it can be argued that anything like that much per photographer is necessary for review times, server space and advertising. The only reason sites can get away with it is because of the huge numbers of contributors each acting as individuals. Also, if it were possible for enough photogs to act as a unit, something could be done about the ever lower pricing per photo sale.  Isn't it time we got unionised!!