MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - stokfoto
1
« on: October 18, 2012, 18:37 »
Received a refund notification from IS but as far as I know (might be wrong though) even if the file was refunded I should still be able to see this among my sale reports. Having checked my sales for the exact date when the files had been purchased I haven't see it being reported there Do you think the sale somehow might not have been reported at all? ( a bug or something??) There is a week between the purchase and the refund btw. a
any ideas?
Thanks
2
« on: September 21, 2012, 08:22 »
I am an exclusive videographer on IS and have more than 500 approved footages there, I know that is not a big port , but lately sales have been absolutely terrible not even getting a single sale over a week or ten days. and even when I get sales somehow it all shrunk to small web size ,which doesn't bring much
I was wondering if it is only me affected by it, I notice footage prices a bit higher on IS now, especially SS and FT offering subs, I don't know if this has a bad effect on IS video sales. But these days I am seriously considering dropping exclusivity ,lately it has been so disappointing,and it all started all of a sudden, things were fine until lately:(
3
« on: June 09, 2012, 08:13 »
I am experiencing a dramatic decline in sales on FT. i was wondering if it has something to do with one of these best match shifts again? my 7 day rank was usually around 600 to 700 but for last couple of months I guaranteed a good place below 5000 ,wow!!, all of a sudden customers decided not to my pics any more? I was wondering if it is only me? BTW I've got around 2K files there.
4
« on: March 04, 2012, 10:04 »
I think I lost some of my model relases do you think soft copy would still be valid ,or had I better ask for new ones? it is not always possible thoguh
5
« on: April 05, 2010, 06:15 »
Lately I have been getting a lot of rejections from IS for the shoot description on model release not being good (or descriptive )enough .I am quite puzzled.What do you guy write in this section. I usually include the terms like stock photo session xx(number) but they kept rejection these. As far as understood they want me to include exactly which photos are model released so probably they want me to include detailed info on every single shoot I do of the model. but what they are missing out is that on the MR I am using it already indicates that all the photos of the model taken on that date are released. do you have any tip on make the long story short a brief way to describe. because I usually do variety of subject at one session and including them one by one as part of the description is quite t time consuming and boring.
thanks for your input in advance
7
« on: December 30, 2009, 11:38 »
I know it is not the perfect time of year to judge but lately I only sale really old files of mine.I was wondering if they changed the best match algorithm somehow? Any ideas?it that's so I am quite disappointed as I notice a certain decrease in sales but then again may be I should wait and see what will happen after holiday season
Thanks for your input in advance
8
« on: December 16, 2009, 17:39 »
lately I included the keyword "New year " for some of my father xmas files .IS reviewers found these irrelevant and removed the kws. I wonder if they realise that Santa Claus is the symbol of new year for many non-Christian countries?
9
« on: October 28, 2009, 11:22 »
I am thinking of getting a tripod mount ring for my canon 70 200 f4 IS lens. but the price range for the products in the market are so huge. canon brand rings are sold at $149 at BHphoto also there are cheap third party options on ebay of which prices about $30-50. but I found this cheap third party which is roughly only about $10. http://cgi.ebay.com/Tripod-Mount-Ring-A-W-for-Canon-EF-70-200-300mm-Lens_W0QQitemZ110440813731QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item19b6c914a3I am not considering getting the canon one as I find it too expensive. but how risky do you think it would be to get the cheapest one. at the end of the day it just looks like a piece of simple metal to me but I might be wrong though. so I'd like to hear your opinions. Thanks in advance
11
« on: September 10, 2009, 08:47 »
12
« on: August 14, 2009, 20:31 »
Lately I am experiencing a strange problem while uploading to IS. I was wondering if it was just me? Some files take ages to upload and sometime they don't even seem to be uploaded at all. And then they suddenly appear among my unfinished files in edit page of IS? it drives me mad as it make the slow uploading process even slower ETA: it's nothing to do with file size or my internet connection speed.But it might be because IS's servers might be busy don't know!
13
« on: July 24, 2009, 07:07 »
Hi, It was long ago that I learned not to be too concerned about rejections and move on as it is a part of this business but the reason why opened that thread is that lately I have been getting rejections from SS for some of my images being out of focus,which is not true as all the files accepted everywhere else including IS. What I suspect is that may be some reviewers might be checking the focus accuracy by using a software(rather than viewing at %100) which I think could be very deceptive because for instance I use DPP (Canon's bundle software( to process my raw files )and there you have the option to check the AF point used for the picture.But this information isn't always accurate.because I use the closest AF point to focus my targeted focus area then I lock the AF by pressing the shutter release half way down then recompose and shoot. Let's say if I focused on the eyes but used the AF point that is closer to the ear ,and when checked on the software (like DPP)it will show the focus point on the hair ,which is misleading I think as it can only tell which AFpoint was used rather than where the focus actually is
I was wondering if you had similar experience.
PS: it can't be an optical quality issue as I am using L glasses on my 5d m2 and usually shoot on tripod
14
« on: June 29, 2009, 09:54 »
my beloved 17 40 seems to have some problems:( A while ago I accidentally knocked my lens on the door while the camera was hanging from my shoulder with the strap. just after that when I tried to focus it didn't work I un-mounted it and mounted it back then it seemed to be working but after using the lens yesterday I noticed all the images came out blurry .I did a quick test at home using a tripod and the results were absolutely disappointing. any ideas what might have happened and I would like to get it checked but unfortunately it is no longer under warranty. I was wondering if you have any suggestion on where I should get it fixed in London. in some forums they recommend lehmanns and fixation does any of you have any experience with them? or would it be wiser to send it to a canon repair service? I hope it is not going to be too expensive to get it done.
thank you very much for your responses in advance?
15
« on: June 23, 2009, 21:42 »
I have tried to log in to SS but I can't see the security code neither on firefox nor on IE.I was wondering if it's just me or do you experience the same.?
16
« on: April 11, 2009, 18:51 »
Can anyone please tell me what is the tax process is like for (micro) stock photography earnings.I am about to set up a business in the UK as self-employed and I would like to know how I could prove my microstock earnings. I use paypal as payment method and the money will be transferred to a UK bank. Would it be enough to send the print outs of my pay-out reports and paypal transaction print outs to tax people?? ? I have checked an older thread here but I am not sure if got the answer there. http://www.microstockgroup.com/istockphoto-com/british-student-loans-nightmare-istock-and-maybe-even-tax!-(/thank you very much for your help in advance
18
« on: March 05, 2009, 13:35 »
according to canonrumors.com there are rumors going around that canon would release another firmware upgrade for 5d mark ii in first week of april. and there are also expectations canon would add more manual controls over the video feature. if true ,wouldn't that be sweeeet! . http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/03/5d-mark-ii-firmware-cr2/btw : I finally got my 5d m2 today and the battery is charging, I can't wait to give it a go:)
19
« on: March 01, 2009, 07:36 »
I am currenlty looking for an LCD screen to attach to my laptop and use for photo retouching. my budget is around usd 300 ,I'd like to know if you have any suggestions. size isn't of paramount importance for now so I can do with 19" to 22"
thank you very much for your help in advance. I am going to buy it in the UK so I'd appreciate it if you could post a URL too I did googled it but unfortunately I couldn't find what i am looking for
20
« on: February 17, 2009, 07:58 »
I was wondering if you set "editorial use only" restriction on your photos that hasn't model release or property release ? obviously while I am preparing an image for sale (after approval) I clearly indicate that I don't have the releases but what I wonder is if that is it a must or is it optional to set editorial use only restriction because since the restriction is not automatically applied and user has to set it manually it kind of looks optional. I have been choosing the restriction option for such files but would it limit chances of sales? and what risks would involve if I didn't set the restriction on files that would normally require model or property release.
Thank you very much for your input in advance.
21
« on: February 05, 2009, 16:53 »
Just checked IS and noticed some changes especially with thumbs.now zoom thumbs has a black border. I am not sure if I like it or not.it just seems strange to my eyes.I guess I'll have to get used to it?
hold on a minute,it's gotta be something to do with best match 2.0 too.Now I am nervous:(
22
« on: January 15, 2009, 19:09 »
you might have already noticed this statement on your StockXpert profile page: quoted from StockXpert : ALERT! SYSTEM UPDATE ON JANUARY 22ND
We'll be upgrading our site on Thursday, Jan. 22nd beginning at 9:00 PM EST. Images will not be available for download for a few hours. We hope this advance notice will help you plan your projects accordingly.
I wonder if there is going to be a major change and if this is related to getty takeover?
23
« on: January 09, 2009, 11:37 »
24
« on: January 07, 2009, 05:51 »
my sales have been significantly slow since mid dec 2008 and it continues till now as expected . I hope sales will start to pick up soon since the first week of jan is over. I would like to know how your experience is and expectations on when sale would get back to normal?
Cheers
25
« on: December 19, 2008, 13:10 »
I am looking for stock video sites that sells stock videos with RM license .I am not talking about the big guys like getty but things like Pond5 if I am not wrong pond5 only sells RF? your advice will be much appreciated too.thank you in advance
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|