|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - pieman
1
« on: January 10, 2014, 17:53 »
bpepz
Reply #167 on: Today at 17:16
Quote #link0
Quote from: bpepz on Today at 17:07
Quote from: mayaartist on Today at 13:54
I posted it on istock forum but it was deleted instantly. But here they can't do anything
After reading this article it's become clear that this is a fraud. They desperately looking how to reducing debt. And I don't want to pay for that.
https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-downgrades-Getty-to-B3-from-B2-Outlook-is-Stable--PR_285298
P.S I don't understand why they delete my post on istockpoto forum. Because it's not a secret information. Everybody can find it and read.
After all this I've decided to start delete my portfolio from istockphoto. I don't believe them any more.
Lol, I just posted the same thing and it was deleted as well.
Ok, new update, they have banned me from the forums for posting that link. I had two site mails form Lobo when I posted it. And than I started deleting my images.
seems they are really sensitive about that article. I'm banned now for posting it.
No, it's not that. You posted it three times and ignored my sitemails indicating the article you are linking was from October 31, 2013 and it was in no way related to the Partner Program issues.
2
« on: November 20, 2013, 11:40 »
make sure you deactivate the other 100 as well
I'm sure they will be removed in time.
3
« on: November 20, 2013, 11:33 »
I received this email from Istock:
Dear iStock Member,
After serious consideration, we feel that the adult oriented content in this file (18234425) is not suitable for our broad Royalty Free license and we have decided to remove it. Please note future uploads of similarly explicit content may be rejected.
iStock Content Team
Attached is the image in question.
Here is the deactivation notice on the file you are referencing: Logo (isolated/main focus) Please read the section on Logos & Corporate Branding in our editorial training manual http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=939&sp_rid=&sp_mid=4538780#11This file includes, as the main focus, content that may be subject to copyright protection. We regret that it cannot be licensed in our Editorial collection. Thank you very much for your understanding iStock Content Administrator I'm not sure how you would have received the Adult Content notification. If you are so inclined please feel free to forward the email you received to Contributor Relations. We will take a looksee to see if there is something happening on the notification process.
4
« on: May 31, 2013, 11:02 »
I just want to know who people are in here so I can send them cookie-grams. I have a guy who doesn't change much for shipping so I can send all over the world for pretty cheap.
Whatever the outcome, I look forward to the adventure.
For many of the people on this forum, this is not an "adventure", this is the real world of making a living. Unlike most businesses, we not only have to deal with agencies changing the terms of our agreements to suit themselves, we also have to deal with petty and arbitrary enforcers who only want to see a hundred "woo-yay" posts when they do it.
Keep your cookies.
Oh, and my name is Jim Barber. You banned me a long time ago, and i haven't contributed to your agency for years.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what this discussion is about? A change to the terms of the use of this site? Leaf has indicated why he is looking to test this change in his initial post. I would have to say that it's a valid concern and part of why the majority of the people I talk to about these boards are hesitant to participate.
You can be mad at me for you being banned. I can't say I've always been 100% valid in the bans. However, as mentioned in previous posts, I'm more than reasonable when it comes to reinstatements. If you are of the ilk who WILL NEVER COME BACK well then that's fine too. Why care about being banned from a place you no longer what to participate in.
Whew. Okay, I hope you all get things sorted in here.
Leaf hasn't entered into a contract with me to sell my images, only to unilaterally change that contract because it was "unsustainable". As for being banned, it's of no consequence and did not enter into the decision to leave IS. The point is that you come here and try to turn this into one of your " let's make a joke about pie and you'll do what I say " threads, and I don't buy it. If anything, your posts reinforce Leaf's point, since by knowing who you are we are well aware of your complete lack of credibility.
Maybe I should change my vote...
Actually I made a joke about cookies, not pies. And the name Pieman was used due to the fact that Lobo was already taken back in January 2008. I'm glad I could participate in the reinforcement of the point Leaf was trying to make. I suspect that was my intent. Anyhoo, I will leave you all to it. I think this a pretty lively discussion though so I will continue to lurk 
5
« on: May 30, 2013, 12:14 »
I just want to know who people are in here so I can send them cookie-grams. I have a guy who doesn't change much for shipping so I can send all over the world for pretty cheap.
Whatever the outcome, I look forward to the adventure.
For many of the people on this forum, this is not an "adventure", this is the real world of making a living. Unlike most businesses, we not only have to deal with agencies changing the terms of our agreements to suit themselves, we also have to deal with petty and arbitrary enforcers who only want to see a hundred "woo-yay" posts when they do it.
Keep your cookies.
Oh, and my name is Jim Barber. You banned me a long time ago, and i haven't contributed to your agency for years.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what this discussion is about? A change to the terms of the use of this site? Leaf has indicated why he is looking to test this change in his initial post. I would have to say that it's a valid concern and part of why the majority of the people I talk to about these boards are hesitant to participate. You can be mad at me for you being banned. I can't say I've always been 100% valid in the bans. However, as mentioned in previous posts, I'm more than reasonable when it comes to reinstatements. If you are of the ilk who WILL NEVER COME BACK well then that's fine too. Why care about being banned from a place you no longer what to participate in. Whew. Okay, I hope you all get things sorted in here.
6
« on: May 30, 2013, 07:37 »
Oh, well that makes way more sense. So what do you image those comments mean? It behooves me to ask as it seems like you are under the impression that due to the comments left by the seller they are in discussion with iS and that we had cleared him to utilize the site in this way.
7
« on: May 30, 2013, 07:18 »
Have you read the comments at the bottom?
This is illegal. Read istockphoto TOS. You cannot resell the images you have bought as you don't have this right. Not to mention that you buy an image once and sell it later to several people. If you haven't been sued until now, you can bet you will be now.
http://www.istockphoto.com/help/licenses
"License restrictions
Here is what you cannot do with either a Standard or Extended license:
Sub-license, give away, share or otherwise transfer stand-alone images/files"
Reply;
hoaiphong (100% | $10.3K) Date:4 hours ago
I am understand, however now we resolve all problems and you can run it without any problem about license. As I note before, istockphoto contact me and now all are ok.
And you believe everything you read on the internet? Hrmm. I can assure you we have a team of people working to get them removed from ISPs as soon as they change up. This latest endeavor isn't something we aren't aware of either.
8
« on: May 30, 2013, 07:15 »
I just want to know who people are in here so I can send them cookie-grams. I have a guy who doesn't change much for shipping so I can send all over the world for pretty cheap.
Whatever the outcome, I look forward to the adventure.
9
« on: May 29, 2013, 16:53 »
Nope. No one has been banned from iStock based on anything they have said here. I can attest to this fact as I have been responsable for the majority of the bans since well before I was a member here. I first opened my account here in 2008 and since then I have been actively lurking, with an occasional post here and there.
Account bans and Forum bans are entirely different things, however, the contributors in these boards are entirely free to say whatever they like. And as you might have noticed there are plenty of choice comments directed at iS, Getty, and myself which haven't translated into any repercussions with peoples accounts.
Leaf, good luck. It's not easy keeping a community rolling without upsetting a few people along the way. Whatever you I hope it continues to push the discussions towards civility and conversation rather than trolling and flamethrowers.
You are missing the point completely.
I am? Oh gosh, maybe you can provide me with the point you think I'm missing. Do go on.
10
« on: May 29, 2013, 16:45 »
Nope. No one has been banned from iStock based on anything they have said here. I can attest to this fact as I have been responsable for the majority of the bans since well before I was a member here. I first opened my account here in 2008 and since then I have been actively lurking, with an occasional post here and there.
Account bans and Forum bans are entirely different things, however, the contributors in these boards are entirely free to say whatever they like. And as you might have noticed there are plenty of choice comments directed at iS, Getty, and myself which haven't translated into any repercussions with peoples accounts.
Leaf, good luck. It's not easy keeping a community rolling without upsetting a few people along the way. Whatever you I hope it continues to push the discussions towards civility and conversation rather than trolling and flamethrowers.
13
« on: May 25, 2013, 12:39 »
"Who We Are:
iStockphoto, a division of Getty Images is the world's leading creator and distributor of visual content and the first place creative professionals turn to discover, purchase and manage imagery. The company's award winning photographers and imagery help customers create inspiring work which appears every day in the world's most influential newspapers, magazines, advertising campaigns, films, television programs, books and Web sites. Headquartered in Seattle, WA and serving customers in more than 100 countries, Getty Images believes in the power of imagery to drive positive change, educate, inform, and entertain. Visit Getty Images at http://gettyimages.com."
It's been said before... the fact that a company claiming to be the world leader in image distribution has consistently failed, over a period of years, to correctly distribute images between two of their own websites, speaks volumes about how important this issue is (or was) to iStock/Getty.
I wont say it's been a perfect but we've done pretty good transferring between to the two entirely different systems. Technical issues will be less of an issue as soon as both sites work off the same architecture. It's been a long walk, yes, but it was a walk we've had to take. In time we will have less Connector related woes. It might seem like it's a non-issue to us but in reality having a steady flow of content move between the two sites is really important to us. As I mentioned previously today, we will continue to push for a more reasonable resolution to the backlog of files. It's not a large amount of the content our Exclusives have sent us, in fact it's marginal in volume compared to the amount that has made it to GI. However, it would be great to get everything over pre-Collections changes so we can accommodate the Exclusives that brought their content into the E+ bucket over the last several months. Thanks, folks. Have a terrific weekend.
14
« on: May 25, 2013, 08:21 »
We are going to see what we can do. Old_lady_bird has been pushing for resolution to the problems with the Connector for months. We hope to be able to convince our friends in Dev that this should be a priority. However, Signatue + will more than likely provide an opportunity for the movement of the files already slotted.
Just for reference, how many files do the people posting actually have waiting to be moved over. Feel free to post in the actual thread in the Exclusive forum BUT if you'd like to show your numbers please do.
15
« on: May 17, 2013, 07:58 »
I'm logging in OK, but you've got a point. If you can't log in, you can't use their help system as contributors aren't allowed to phone.
One of these side-effects of their policies that they never seem to identify.
I reckon it's just a cache or cookie related issue, but in the event it's not they can still open support ticket or email us if they aren't able to log on. I hope I've identified a few solutions 
16
« on: February 10, 2013, 17:38 »
I guess that's part of the problem. Everyone wants to make things about me. Well it's about all of us. Yes, this is my account. I'm Lobo on iStock. I'm the horrible monster.
Maybe leaf will let you speak your mind. I can assure you I've read plenty of terrible things in my 11 years with iStock so you won't hurt my feelings. One thing you might consider: swearing and cursing at me might only go towards proving my point as to why you were banned in the first place.
As for the REASONS people are typically banned: it comes down to civility. There are people who seem to have an interesting way of omitting certain facts related to the loss of their privileges. I won't call people out but if you consider the inherent tone present here it might be easier to understand.
These forums have lurkers too. People who would like to participate are hesitant because there is rarely anything constructive going on. It seems to be a catch all for anger and rage. I read these forums everyday. Don't think for a second I don't.
Anyway. Have at it. I'll leave you all now and let you prove me wrong. Thanks for reading. Apologies for any grammar or spelling issue. I'm typing this on my phone.
17
« on: February 10, 2013, 16:31 »
I've actually added it to my facebook status. Terrific work. I think maybe you should consider a caption contest. I would be more than happy to participate in that. As for this Banned from iStock Club: I understand. It's easy for you to speak about your experience without also taking into consideration the number of times I have had to contact people, delete posts, try as best as I can to rationalize why it's important for people to remain civil. I'm not perfect. I rise to the bait left out for me occasionally. These are public forums too. We can all read them. Contributor Relations(who tend to get the worst of the frustration - see the deactivation notice thread you have going), Client Relations(they get the calls that should probably be going to Contributor Relations- no phone support is horrible, I know) and the few buyers who come in to see what is going on here. Everyone sees everything. Anyhoo, I've already made it clear in the forum restructure thread that anyone who would like to discuss having their privileges reinstated are more than welcome to contact me via site mail on iStock. Clearly, not all of you have site mail either. So I suspect your best bet is via a support ticket. Thanks, folks. Don't hate the player, hate the game
18
« on: November 27, 2012, 09:31 »
I posted a critical post on the iStock forum.
It took 8 minutes before it was deleted and gone.
What is your record?
Dunno. I've had several posts deleted but I'm not quite sad enough to sit there with a stop-watch recording on-line survival time. You need to get out more __ or maybe restrained and kept in but away from computers. One or the other anyway.
Don't worry, you still got the record
19
« on: August 09, 2011, 17:07 »
I love fan threads
20
« on: October 12, 2010, 13:05 »
It's a technical glitch. Payments will stay as they have been over the last 2 years. There will be no change in the payment schedule. It sucks but it will be resolved for Friday Morning.
21
« on: August 21, 2010, 12:46 »
Sure. If you take in to account that English being a second or maybe even third language for some of our contributors you can expect some lost-in-translation events. However, that doesn't prevent the buyers and contributors who want to engage in the Request forum to get what the need. There are a handful of buyers who are in there quite regular and we are yet to experience any contacts that characterize the forum as a negative experience. So, I guess because it bugs you it bugs everyone. Anyhoo, like I said in my previous post people engage in the activities the enjoy most. I hope you continue to enjoy yourself
22
« on: August 20, 2010, 16:37 »
The people who participate seem to enjoy themselves. Frankly, that's part of the point. However, I know lots of people who fuel themselves by hating on random stuff and they seem to enjoy it. So I guess everyone wins The Request New Image forum concern I'd have to agree with though. However, it's also a source of comedy when you see some of the non-requested images pop up.
23
« on: August 18, 2010, 13:50 »
I'm going to also let you know that files used in your application approval wont necessarily be approved for your live portfolio. So don't lose heart if the files aren't approved.
25
« on: June 17, 2010, 10:46 »
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=223181&page=11#replyRest assured we have people working on things. Sorry for the trouble, folks. The thread linked above is where everyone is commenting. One thing I will leave with you all is a short list of the errors we have received so far: 1. Uploads Page is unavailable. 2. Detailed Catagories box in the uploads section is not working properly 3. error 4004 (you do not have the correct access level to use this class) while trying to add keywords through DeepMeta. So, if you are one of the people who have been given a forced day off from uploading at iStock it's probably due to the missing Uploads Page. However, if you are experiencing any additional errors please feel free to either add your issue to the thread linked above, PM me here, or send me a site mail at iStock. Lobo out.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
