MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - slayer35

Pages: [1]
1
Shutterstock
Alamy
iStock/getty
dreamstime
bigstock
123rf
deposit

all except editorial
As I know istock/getty dont accept editorial footage ,they only accept editorial photos.

2
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Is megapixel important for stock stills?l
« on: February 27, 2019, 16:37 »
Hi there ,I own a panasonic g85 and couple panasonic lenses (12-35 and 35-100).I started to upload some photos and videos to istockphoto .As you may now my camera is 16mp , and I want to ask is megapixels so important in stock photography? Do I need to change my camera to a newer one with more megapixes? (forexample a7riii or a7iii).
Thanks ...

Years and years ago when iStock was easily the most successful stock agency they offered pictures in various sizes - from small to medium, to large, extra large etc.  The largest size was XXL and equated to about 21mp.  Sometimes they skewed the search to place an emphasis on those images available at the largest sizes.  This caused many photographers to want to upgrade equipment to at least 21mp (and why the Canon 5Dii was such a big seller).

However life has changed a lot since those days, with the largest share of the buyers market being for electronic delivery (web pages) where such large sizes are simply not necessary.  As web pages change daily what those buyers want is a huge supply of attractive and relevant images but they only need sizes for their web designs.  Yes there is still a market for printed media, billboards, company reports etc but those markets are dwindling.  The newest market is cellphones of course and an increasing need for images just to display on phones and tablets.

So I don't think size matters any more.  And to show how relevant this is, iStock took away their various size options and now offer only a one size download.

If you are an ad agency photographer shooting fashion, advertising etc for the big corporations, then it's still important to deliver maximum size and quality.  But for basic stock photography anything in the 24-36mp area is certainly large enough.  And frankly most high quality starter cameras now come at 24mp.
Thanks for your answer.Mine is 16mp ,and in istockphoto my photos are only XL  ,that's why I was thinking a higher mp camera.But I totally get you ,nowadays higher mp is not so necessary like in the past.

3
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Is megapixel important for stock stills?l
« on: February 24, 2019, 10:51 »
Without knowing what sort of work you do, I would suggest that there'd be other things to spend any spare cash on that might help you more than a camera with a higher number of pixels. Good (off camera) lighting and lighting modifiers, for example.

If you find you can sell a decent volume of work using your existing equipment, you might then consider upgrading your gear. If you're not selling, I very much doubt the issue is your 16mp camera. I'd also suggest that you upload to other agencies as iStock probably isn't a good place (these days) to test your ability to produce saleable stock.
Thanks for your answer.I'm mostly shooting outdoors and travel photos .I guess Lighting equipments is not for me.And last year I had earned half of my equipment's price.I was just thinking ,even if I had used a newer camera last year ,would my earnings be better?
Thanks for you answers.

4
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Is megapixel important for stock stills?l
« on: February 23, 2019, 12:14 »
I totaly get both of you ,thanks for your commets @Uncle Pete and @qunamax.Do you think in long term will more megapixels worth to try  or just travel more with that money and use the same equipment ?  By the way I have only one account in istock exclusive photography and video ,I dont know if this is called microstock.

5
Cameras / Lenses / Is megapixel important for stock stills?l
« on: February 23, 2019, 09:00 »
Hi there ,I own a panasonic g85 and couple panasonic lenses (12-35 and 35-100).I started to upload some photos and videos to istockphoto .As you may now my camera is 16mp , and I want to ask is megapixels so important in stock photography? Do I need to change my camera to a newer one with more megapixes? (forexample a7riii or a7iii).
Thanks ...

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors