MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Sandeel

Pages: [1]
1
Adobe Stock / This is highly unprofessional
« on: October 19, 2023, 07:17 »
Many may praise Adobe to the skies, but I think they are being unprofessional. As a high volume seller with a rather small portfolio I put a lot of work into each image, and Adobe (or rather Fotolia) used to appreciate that, but nowadays it's getting ridiculous.

A whole batch of seasonal images waited a whole month for review just to be rejected as a whole! I never get any rejections at all, so a whole beautiful batch, are you kidding me? Did they even look at them, or are they so overworked with the avalanche of AI images that they just don't care anymore?

My new images are not presented to the buyers at all. In theory they have a chance if they are shown under the older bestsellers when people click on those, but Adobe very unwisely shows videos under photos and vice versa. Also the thumbnails there, especially for panoramas, are STILL all stretched, distorted and useless. The series that are shown when you click on "see more" don't make sense at all. So much is missing randomly. It's all a mess, and Adobe has NO IDEA which images have high selling potentiality and which ones don't. They mostly show the images that never could pick up properly, and even after years stick to those, instead of showing new stuff or at least older stuff that sold great but suddenly got lost in the algorithm. And when once in a blue moon an image picks up and sells 5 times every day, after one month they literally kill it by throwing it from page one straight to page 300 or so, never to be seen again. This is not how you find and sell successful content, Adobe.

I wonder how many people have noticed these obvious problems. If you don't agree, fine, but please don't write comments like "if they are so bad why do you upload to them". I still earn my livelihood with them, but the better and bigger my portfolio becomes, the worse the sales become.

2
Shutterstock.com / Contributor page's new design
« on: May 27, 2022, 03:27 »
Why is it that often when they want to offer something new it is worse than the last version??

I know new things need some time to get used to, but with some things I know right away that I will never like them. In the old version every important info was visible at one glance. You could at once see how many videos or singles or ELs you had sold on a day. Now you have to navigate through dropdown menus and choose categories and file types to be able to see that. What kind of improvement is that?

3
Adobe Stock / We need to be able to set thumbnails for videos
« on: April 06, 2022, 06:40 »
As long as we can't choose a thumbnail for our footage, most of the files will simply not get noticed. It's simple psychology: the buyers will notice the more interesting thumbnails and watch a preview, they can't watch every single video and see which one is actually the best. The thumbnails have to be representative, which is often not the case if they are generated randomly. I noticed that my videos that sell have nice thumbnails and the non-performers have unfortunate thumbnails that by the way mess up my portfolio.

Any thoughts or infos I may not be aware of?

4
The algorithm apparently changed a huge deal today, at least for me. My older files from the Fotolia times are keyworded in German, the newer ones in English. Now when I search for something, the translation doesn't work anymore. It means that my older, all times best sellers are not even considered by the search when the buyer uses an English keyword. This wans't the case until yesterday, because I happened to check something and it worked fine. Now even if I sort by downloads, any best seller with thousands of DLs is just not there. Can anybody run some tests and confirm this? Mat from Adobe, can you help please? I really hope something is temporarily wrong and this is not intentional. Thanks.

5
Shutterstock.com / 0.25$ footage sales
« on: January 20, 2022, 05:12 »
I'm increasingly getting those 0.25$ footage sales on Shutterstock. In fact it applies to most footage sales these days. What's happening and where is this going?

6
Shutterstock.com / "Similar content" rejections
« on: May 01, 2020, 03:44 »
What's up with these "similar content" rejections? I never had those, until recently. It's enough for a composite to have an element which I had used once before to get a rejection. In my case I find this extremely unfair, because the end results are not similar at all and I work for hours on every single image. At the same time I see whole batches of really similar content when I go through fresh content that they accept. Is there a way to make them see the injustice or is this a dumb robot deciding?  :-\

7
123RF / What happened to the faved/followed feature?
« on: June 30, 2015, 03:16 »
There was this "faved" feature which was renamed to "followed" if I remember correctly. You could choose some of your images and they were supposed to get better rankings in the search. Now I can't find the feature anymore, it was under "sell images". Have you ever used it and did it help? Is it really gone or am I missing something?

Thanks!

8
PhotoDune / "We need you to change your password"
« on: May 19, 2014, 16:25 »
Trying to log in to PhotoDune, I'm getting a page with the following message:

"Hi there. We need you to change your password.
...
An email has been sent to (my E-mail address) with further instructions and a link that you'll need to follow. Click on the link, enter a new password and you'll be back in business.
..."

I might be paranoid, but is it safe to click on a link in such an E-mail? Isn't that a common way to steal passwords? Have you got that message too, and how do you know it's really from Envato?

Thanks.

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors