pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Microstock Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 53
226
123RF / Re: Just removed all photos from 123rf
« on: June 12, 2015, 17:23 »
I removed my port last year I think, or was it the year before. There were a number of reasons for leaving. One of them being I didn't like working with them or the way they worked (this might not matter to many people but it's important to me).

The strangest experience I had was when I wrote to them asking to change the descriptions of a few editorial images. I had made a terrible mistake in the descriptions of these images which needed to be rectified to be factually accurate. Instead of a thank you for informing us email (remember the mistake was being displayed on their site and being viewed by their buyers), I received a long winded and scolding email basically saying don't do it again (does anyone actually set out to intentionally make mistakes?) and saying how difficult it was for their IT personnel to change the descriptions, maybe that's a good indication of how smart their IT personnel are. They did inform me they will make the changes to the descriptions though. They never actually did. There's a difference in making a mistake and being unprofessional. I made a mistake, they were unprofessional. I don't regret leaving.

227
Site Related / Re: Agree not agree
« on: June 11, 2015, 04:10 »
Ok I missed it, so I'm back now.  :D

228
Site Related / Re: Agree not agree
« on: June 11, 2015, 04:09 »
This forum sucks. I'm out of here.  >:(

229
General Stock Discussion / Re: I love Shutterstock!!
« on: April 16, 2015, 08:13 »
I think they paid out $80 million dollars to contributors last year. How many cents is that?

230
Alamy.com / Re: Why we love Microstock (blog post)
« on: March 18, 2015, 13:48 »
"Forcing customers to buy credits may simplify the process on one hand, but can lead to customers paying too much, forgetting they have credits available and in some cases have them expire before they can use them."

Customers aren't forced to do anything, they could buy from sites like Alamy if they wish but microstock buyers prefer to license many images for the price of one of yours. And these forgetful buyers somehow keep remembering to come back and buy new credits.

231
Bigstock.com / Re: Request for Sean L.
« on: February 28, 2015, 15:12 »
Just curious, why pull thumbnails?

To see the sold images without having to click on the image links. That's my guess.

232
Pepsi has said this on the post.

Translated from Portuguese:

"Thanks for your pertinent observation!

By mistake we do not publish the correct version of the image. The final version includes your photo, we like a lot, but without the watermark.

If you want to send us a private message to you do get proof of purchase of the image, which as you can see is still done on Friday.

Thank you for your attention!"

233
Dreamstime.com / Re: Credit sale for 0,12$ at Dreamstime!!!?????
« on: December 11, 2014, 10:19 »
12 cents ??? Time for a sad song.

<a href="http://youtu.be/bY4YVyKh--c" target="_blank" class="aeva_link bbc_link new_win">http://youtu.be/bY4YVyKh--c</a>

234
Computer Hardware / Re: Ergonomics - Do you sit or stand?
« on: December 05, 2014, 23:10 »
"Just bend over.. Mwa-ha-ha-haaaa!", said the agency.  :o

235
Shutterstock.com / Re: How are sales going?- Shutterstock
« on: March 13, 2014, 08:04 »
Yesterday, I made 50% more off of ODDownloads than 25aDay.  Interesting.

It's not unusual for contributors to get a fair proportion of their revenue from sales that are not subs.

http://www.microstockposts.com/just-how-much-of-a-subscription-site-is-shutterstock

236
What the he-ll guys, up until now we got ZERO $$$ from bloggers...

I have always bought microstock for my blog and I'm not the only one.

237
Shutterstock.com / Re: S J Locke Uploading to Shutterstock
« on: February 13, 2014, 20:57 »
Passed the $500 mark.  I do see quite a few non sub sales.  No ELs yet tho.

Keep trying Sean. If you need any advice just let me know. ;)

238
When you explain to your mother's cronies what it is you do and afterwards there is complete silence, apart from the cat releasing a fart. Then your mother says: "My other son is a lawyer."

That's a good one! ;D

239
When you tell an agency exactly what you think of them in their forum.

240
Newbie Discussion / Re: Fotolia
« on: December 14, 2013, 09:10 »
Here's an example of how Fotolia operates, which might explain why they're so deep in debt.  I recently received this email message from them...

Quote
We were recently contacted by one of your models, [model's name]. She has asked us to remove the images you uploaded even though a model release has been provided. This complaint has raised some questions about your account and as a result we have blocked your account until this issue can be resolved. If [model] will remove her request we can reopen your account. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely, 

Chad Bridwell
Director of Operations
Fotolia.com
206-683-4942
[email protected]

Skype Chad_fotolia
Linkedin - www.linkedin.com/in/chadbridwell/



Shocking! :o  Fotolia don't live in the same world as the rest of us and they never will.

241
Newbie Discussion / Re: Shutterstock
« on: December 13, 2013, 03:47 »
Because each time you apply, it is a new review, which can lead to different results from the same images. They are not looking back at the results of the previous 10 that you sent.


242
is it worth selling these on micros may be read as "is it worth selling these great images on worthless micros"..
at least that's how it sounded to me.. and since the images aren't really as good as thread title implies, the answer was spot on..
I didn't infer that at all.
It's clearly all in the interpretation.
I interpreted it as "is there any point in trying to sell these images on micros?".

I thought the same.

243
90% of ufos in pictures are insects.

..and the other 10% are aliens in spaceships with malfunctioning cloaking devices.  :D

244
Shutterstock.com / Re: Dropbox Integration Violates TOS ?
« on: September 25, 2013, 08:17 »
Here we go again.

245
Shutterstock.com / Re: Changes to the TOS at Shutterstock
« on: September 24, 2013, 06:51 »
SS posts a total of their earnings, their profits, the number of individual sales, the average revenue of every sale.

What on earth can we contributors do that will give the competition more information??

+1

I wonder if they could object to us publishing stats without revealing who the agency is. My earnings this month was $xx on "unnamed agency", compared to $xx on Dreamstime etc.

Until now broadcasting of stats has been good publicity for ss, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

246
General Stock Discussion / Re: How to Leave guide
« on: September 17, 2013, 04:57 »
crestock were good and have offered me my princely payout of $8.xx

My experience with Crestock was hilarious, luckily I had too few images with them to care and I guess the feeling was mutual. I was only making an enquiry, I hadn't made a decision but they were all too keen to get rid of my images, or was it me ::). Here's my email communication with them.

Me: If I want to take my images off Crestock, is the only way of doing this by
closing my account?

CS: This email is to confirm that the images which were formerly active in your portfolio have now been removed. I can leave your account active, or close it if you wish. Let me know what you prefer and I will take care of it for you.

Me: Close the account. Thank you.

I didn't ask for the money, nor did they send it, but it was a tiny amount, maybe $2 or $3.






247
General Stock Discussion / Re: Going non-exclusive - 2 yrs later
« on: September 16, 2013, 18:27 »
My main issue has been getting files from the last 5 years on other sites.  I took the approach of keeping anything SS wouldn't take as exclusive on DT.  But only half my portfolio is on SS.  If I could get all my files up they would beat DT. 

What for? I don't think exclusive images by non-exclusive contributors get favoured in search results and you only get a little extra for these exclusive files on Dt. If I had 3k images I wouldn't keep half of them on just one site because they didn't get on ss. Plus if you choose again carefully, I'm sure a lot of the ones which didn't get on ss would get on next time, their reviewing process is primarily a human one.

248
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStockphoto Relaunch Sept. 17, 2013
« on: September 16, 2013, 16:27 »
Apparently they are just changing the logo, not the site: http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=356290&page=1


What's the point of the period at the end?  (no pun intended)

www.iStock.com

An indication of their direction? A full stop.

249
They should rethink instead.

250
Dreamstime.com / Re: $2.00 subscription sale?
« on: September 14, 2013, 10:22 »
here today  $2.50 subscription sale an image at level 2,  ?

That's strange. They announced this, "The royalties awarded are $2.00 for non-exclusive contributors and $2.20 for exclusives."

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 53

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors