From what I see your better versions are on Shutterstock. That's just opinion but those aren't the kinds of images I was saying belong at higher priced sites, they are good just not unique enough especially when you have very very similar ones on microstock sites. And you're selling the ones on Getty as RF, I'm thinking more about RM with a much higher royalty rate or somewhere like Stocksy, also with a much higher royalty rate.
sorry if quote the wrong person. but who said my red quotes is indeed very right. we have to realise rm and rf are 2 different kinds of animals. micro is all about volume, cheap to zero cost productions
earning pennies to the odd super large 108 bucks SD.
rm don't sell often but when they do they make up for the lack of daily ( fries and baby burgers sold a million a day at the
big M little s's... is and ss
if we look for options, perharps here is the option to leave ss as they are with our old port intact.
and just make rm images that
belong at higher priced sites, unique enough . the energy wasted on waiting for ss to become accountable and responsible like they were pre-going public will be put to more productive use going for such a change in workflow.
i will take what you say as my new course today... even though it was not directed at all of us here.
but stocksy is not an option either. it has no history (yet) and does no rm (do they?)
well said tickstock