Quote from: rjmiz on November 08, 2007, 16:45
But THEY ARE employed.....that's my point!
A reviewer is such a lowly job, don't you agree?

No.  Reviewing is a great job and reviewers are great, I aspire to be like them.  They are the best part of microstock, I love them all.

<<Any reviewers here?  >>

Not anymore.  I have been there though, and you may consider hard to believe, and be surprised, to know that in general reviewers would prefer by far to be in a position to accept a picture.  It's more rewarding.

These reviewers are photographers like us, some are probably participating here in this forum.  They don't have a lowly job, nor a great one either.  They chose to be reviewers because they like it, or the incentive is big enough, they wouldn't be able to continue that job otherwise.  And when they submit pictures, they get treated the same way as the non-reviewers, no difference.

An angry reviewer sounds to me like an honest lawyer and an altruistic politician 

Most reviewers do a fine job.  It is really unfair to put the work that they preform down.  However there are a few in the barrel or maybe one just having a bad day that create occasion problems.  I think that if they paid them more there would be less issues.

Most of them are fellow photographers and review for various reasons, such as improving their own work etc.

Quote from: rolffimages on October 26, 2007, 21:57
Hey Guys,

If you don't know what I am referring to as the angry reviewer then ignore this post

Can you give us a hint? 

Quote from: Gregor909 on November 09, 2007, 21:40

Quote from: rolffimages on October 26, 2007, 21:57
Hey Guys,

If you don't know what I am referring to as the angry reviewer then ignore this post

Can you give us a hint? 

Lots of shouting, but when asked for details, we get... If you don't know, then ignore this thread?