MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: ROFL... Funny rejection on SS..  (Read 4653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: November 02, 2006, 05:04 »
0
 Just had to share this, after all the threads on rejections..

I submitted four photos to SS a couple of days ago.  Two of which were rejected....

I keep a spreadsheet of all my image names, and where they are uploaded to, with captions, keywords etc.  I just went to update it, and went to the image status page on SS.

The two rejected images  are sitting one above the other on the screen:

The first one has the reason: "Not Approved: Over use of noise reduction software"

The other has: "Not Approved: Noise, film grain, artifacts, or pixilation at 100%. Try noise reduction software"

 ;D  I'm sooo confused... 


« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2006, 09:34 »
0
never try to understand the inner working of the reviewers mind

many have tried
many have failed

obviously didn't like the image but they never seem to say that

« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2006, 16:04 »
0
I'm still waiting for the punch line.

« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2006, 17:32 »
0
assuming that wasn't sarcastic or that you didn't get the 'joke'...

she was saying that one image they complained about TOO MUCH noise reduction use and then the next image they say, this image is too grainy please use MORE noise reduction.

« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2006, 18:34 »
0
I'm still waiting for the punch line.

Do lawyers have a sense of humor?

 ;)

« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2006, 20:20 »
0
assuming that wasn't sarcastic or that you didn't get the 'joke'...

she was saying that one image they complained about TOO MUCH noise reduction use and then the next image they say, this image is too grainy please use MORE noise reduction.

Somewhat sarcastic, somewhat serious. I knew what she was saying, yet I don't see the joke. The posting didn't say that two photos were both edited in the same fashion, that they were of the same photo, etc. For all we know the one image WAS over processed, and the other DID contain noise.

To GeoPappas:
Who do you think comes up with all the lawyer jokes?
« Last Edit: November 02, 2006, 20:22 by yingyang0 »

« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2006, 01:34 »
0
?????  She?  :-)

I think I need an avatar!

« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2006, 01:37 »
0
Sorry, should have said.....   Neither photo was edited, both shot on a 20D at ISO 100 in good light..

I just thought it looked funny on screen...

« Reply #8 on: November 03, 2006, 03:30 »
0
?????  She?  :-)

I think I need an avatar!

opps :)  sorry


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
3791 Views
Last post November 09, 2007, 09:58
by vonkara
4 Replies
3783 Views
Last post December 21, 2007, 16:49
by yingyang0
Funny thing

Started by CofkoCof 123RF

1 Replies
4230 Views
Last post May 22, 2008, 10:35
by Pixart
0 Replies
1598 Views
Last post January 18, 2010, 15:26
by willie
4 Replies
3051 Views
Last post November 09, 2011, 01:58
by traveler1116

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors