pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Shutterstock & Model Release Dates  (Read 3762 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: December 29, 2009, 00:10 »
0
I just received this rejection for an image uploaded to Shutterstock:

"please include a date on model release of photo shoot"

Since when is this required for Shutterstock?  Anyone else seeing this problem?



« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2009, 02:44 »
0
The date on the release was always required, in general any signed document should have a date.

What Shutterstock does NOT require (yet) is to sign a new release for each session with the same model.

« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2009, 03:23 »
0
What Shutterstock does NOT require (yet) is to sign a new release for each session with the same model.
SS also doesn't require (yet) birth date of model and a visual reference. A date, location and witness was always required.

« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2009, 12:18 »
0
Actually, the release I used was dated.  The signature on the release was dated.  The reviewer apparently wanted the date of the shoot, not the date of the signature.  This is something new from Shutterstock

My new releases have that along with all the other nonsense that IS has decided to require but this model release was older.  I've used this model release for years with no problems.  Since the photos and the release are several months old I hope they don't suddenty change the rules.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
2814 Views
Last post March 02, 2010, 17:48
by PeterChigmaroff
8 Replies
3520 Views
Last post February 14, 2017, 02:58
by rickwang
2 Replies
1167 Views
Last post June 01, 2017, 16:36
by LouisPhotos
18 Replies
2746 Views
Last post April 26, 2018, 15:48
by ForrestBrown
11 Replies
2182 Views
Last post November 09, 2018, 11:40
by derek

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results