Alright, I was going to let this thread fade out and refrain myself from posting because in the end it always turns out the same but your post pretty much nailed it JPSDK, at least someone is being honest here, not hiding behind his/her own success.
That is what I need to realise and act upon, agencies do not give a * about their photographers (excluding a selective group of course) but only their own staff and clients.
I pretty much knew this already but I always try to think positive and hope for changes.

Alright my rants are over, no more. Thanks all for your input, especially JPSDK.
Take care

@Lagereek

When are these ppl going to realize they have entered into a field normally associated with professionals and just accept it?

If this was true we wouldn't be having this conversation now would we. That's just the whole point of this thread, reviewers/agencies acting more professionally, doing what they are paid for but then to you that means only accepting your work, the rest is garbage 

Microstock = supermarket industry
Macrostock = professional industry 

When are you going to realise that?

Does anyone know if largecreek is a reviewer or a god?  How dare noobs enter into his kingdom!

These threads are pointless unless you post the rejected photos. How can we draw a conclusion about whether there is some great conspiracy with some hitherto unknown motives if we can't see what they are unfairly rejecting?

I have requested Tyler to lock this thread, sorry guys, thanks all for your input, even the good and the bad, much appreciated.

Take care all

I've had enough of fossils complaining about noobs complaining about reviewers. Complain away...it's good for your health and keeps you from being complacent�as long as you do something about it  

Proud to be a noobian, no matter how many years I have in graphic arts.

i thought we were having a serious discussion.
??

Honestly, I think your last post covered it and there's no where else to go without actual photos to look at.